Closed-loop Response to Unannounced Mixed and Carbohydrates-rich Breakfasts (CRUMB)
The CRUMB Study: Closed-loop Response to Unannounced Mixed and Carbohydrates-rich Breakfasts. A Randomized Controlled Crossover Pilot-study in a Cohort of Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.
The development of advanced hybrid closed-loop (a-HCL) systems represents a significant step toward in improving glucose control and reducing user-dependent variability, especially In pediatric patients. Systems can automatically deliver correction boluses and modulate insulin delivery based on CGM feedback, thereby compensating for some of the consequences of human error. Current evidence suggests that a-HCL systems can tolerate unannounced carbohydrate loads up to approximately 20 g without compromising time in range (TIR) or safety. However, the metabolic response to larger or compositionally complex meals remains variable and highly dependent on the specific algorithm governing insulin delivery.
Currently a variety of AID are commercially available: all of them present similarities and differences. The Medtronic MiniMed™ 780G uses a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithm, a mathematical model that adjusts in real time insulin delivery rate based on 3 elements obtained from CGM reading values: the difference between the actual value and the chosen glucose target (proportional action), past values (integral action) and the glucose's rate of change (derivative action), In contrast, the Tandem t:slim X2™ with Control-IQ employs a model predictive control (MPC) algorithm, which aims, through a complex mathematical model, to predict glucose trends up to half-an-hour in the future, takin, also, in consideration actual and past glucose values. Despite sharing the same objective, said algorithms have different approaches, the former one being "reactive" and the latter "predictive". Therefore, their difference could result in different performances while facing mixed-nutrient meal or unannounced meals, defined as the consumptions of a meal with any prior insulin administration.
Pediatric patients represent certainly a unique subgroup in which therapeutic adherence is a relevant issue, due to cognitive, developmental and behavioral factors. Understanding how different AID algorithms respond to unannounced meals in this age group is therefore crucial for optimizing safety and personalization of diabetes management.
This study was designed to evaluate the strengths and limitations of two a-HCL systems, the Medtronic 780G (PID algorithm) and the Tandem t:slim X2 (MPC algorithm), in managing unannounced meals with different macronutrient compositions in children and adolescents with T1D. We also aim to better understand physiological and technological unannounced meal implications as to provide additional insight useful for the development of new fully closed loop algorithms, capable of minimizing glucose excursions and patient's burden.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sicily
-
Catania, Sicily, Italy, 95123
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - San Marco" - Catania
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 11 and 18 years;
- Type 1 diabetes diagnosed for at least 12 months;
- Use of an A-HCL device for at least 3 months;
- Proficiency in carbohydrate counting.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of malabsorption disorders;
- Presence of chronic diabetes complications.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Announced meal (AM)
Participants followed their usual therapy while consuming both the "CHO meal" and the "mixed meal" three times each.
In this phase, the carbohydrate content of each meal was announced to the insulin pump, and pre-meal boluses were delivered as per standard practice.
|
|
|
Experimental: Unannounced meal (UM)
Participants consumed the same meals, an equal number of times, without announcing their carbohydrate intake to the device.
Consequently, no user-initiated boluses were administered during this period, and all insulin delivery adjustments were determined exclusively by the algorithm.
|
Participants consumed both the "CHO meal" and the "mixed meal" three times each, without announcing their carbohydrate intake to the device.
Consequently, no user-initiated boluses were administered during this period, and all insulin delivery adjustments were determined exclusively by the algorithm.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in blood glucose concentration from pre-meal to two hours post-meal (2h-ΔBG), as measured by CGM in mg/dl
Time Frame: from pre-meal to two hours post-meal
|
Change in blood glucose concentration from pre-meal to two hours post-meal (2h-ΔBG), as measured by CGM
|
from pre-meal to two hours post-meal
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Pre- and post-meal four-hour glucose difference (4h-ΔBG), as measured by CGM in mg/dl
Time Frame: from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
|
Peak CGM value in mg/dl
Time Frame: from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
|
Time to peak CGM value
Time Frame: from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
|
Percentage of spent time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL), as measured by CGM
Time Frame: from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
|
Percentage of spent time in tight range (TITR, 70-140 mg/dL), as measured by CGM
Time Frame: from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
|
Percentage of spent time below range (TBR, < 70 mg/dL), as measured by CGM
Time Frame: from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
|
Percentage of spent time above range (TAR, > 180 mg/dL), as measured by CGM
Time Frame: from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
|
Percentage of spent time in second-level TAR (> 250 mg/dL), as measured by CGM
Time Frame: from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
from pre-meal to four hour postprandial
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CRUMB Study
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
-
NCT06783309RecruitingType 1 Diabetes | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | T1DM | T1D | Type 1 Diabetes in Adolescence | Type 1 Diabetes in Children | Type 1 Diabetes Patients | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitis | T1DM - Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes (Juvenile Onset)
-
NCT07427134RecruitingType 1 Diabetes Mellitus | T1DM | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) | T1DM - Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
-
NCT06676566Enrolling by invitationType 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Stage 2 Type 1 Diabetes | Stage 1 Type 1 Diabetes | Stage 3 Type 1 Diabetes
-
NCT07336459Active, not recruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus 1
-
NCT03211858CompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
-
NCT07610213Not yet recruitingType 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Autoimmune Diabetes | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM)
-
NCT07493122Not yet recruitingType 1 Diabetes | Diabetes Type 1 | Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
-
NCT05168657CompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1 | Type 1 Diabetes | Diabetes type1 | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Autoimmune Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent | Juvenile-Onset Diabetes | Diabetes, Autoimmune | Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus 1 | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent, 1
-
NCT01781975CompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Diabetes Mellitus, Type I | Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus 1 | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent, 1 | IDDM
-
NCT00229658CompletedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Clinical Trials on Unannounced meal
-
NCT03305718CompletedBiomarkers of Food Intake in Healthy Subjects
-
NCT06822062RecruitingIron Deficiency (Without Anemia)
-
NCT02200796CompletedObesity | Overweight
-
NCT06582381RecruitingGlucose Metabolism | Amino Acid Metabolism
-
NCT04061369TerminatedObesity | Overweight | Body Weight
-
NCT02479048Completed
-
NCT07392905RecruitingObesity | Feeding Behavior | Metabolomics | Brain Function | Macronutrients
-
NCT06949683CompletedBlood Pressure | Glucose Response