To Compare the Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-operative Healing of the Implant
Assessment of Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-Operative Healing
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Sarah Startley, DMD
- Phone Number: 205-975-8711
- Email: ss1971@uab.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Maria Geisinger, DDS, MS
- Phone Number: 205-934-4984
- Email: miagdds@uab.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294-0007
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
-
Contact:
- Sarah Startley, DMD
- Phone Number: 205-975-8711
- Email: ss1971@uab.edu
-
Contact:
- Maria Geisinger, DDS, MS
- Phone Number: 205-934-4984
- Email: miagdds@uab.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Maria L Geisinger, DDS, MS
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English speaking
- At least 18 years old
- Must be a patient of the UAB Dental School
- Able to read and understand informed consent document
- Patients presenting with a single edentulous site planned for dental implant placement
- Presence of periodontally healthy, non-carious neighboring teeth and/or healthy restored dental implants on either side of edentulous site planned for dental implant placement.
- No anticipated need for surgical and/or endodontic care at teeth adjacent to the proposed surgical site during the study period.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-English speaking
- Less than 18 years old
- Smokers/tobacco users (>10 cigarettes/day)
- Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing
- Absence of adjacent teeth/implants on either side of the tooth to be extracted and/or edentulous sites where 2 or more adjacent implants are planned.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Pilot Drill Guide (PDG)
Matrix-based pilot drill guides fabricated using casts derived from digital wax ups of the proposed final restoration based upon initial implant planning and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol.
|
Matrix-based pilot drill guides fabricated using casts derived from digital wax ups of the proposed final restoration based upon initial implant planning and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol.
|
|
Experimental: Fully Guided (FG
3-D printed guides fabricated based upon digital wax ups and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol and guided implant placement kits
|
3-D printed guides fabricated based upon digital wax ups and will be placed using the standard manufacturer's protocol and guided implant placement kits.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant placement deviation from computerized planning
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Implant placement deviation from computerized planning at 12-month post-placement using CBCT overlay measurement techniques.
|
12 months
|
|
Radiographic marginal bone loss
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 months
|
Radiographic marginal bone loss as measured using digital measurement tools and calibrated parallel two-dimensional radiographic images from baseline dental implant placement to 12-months post-implant placement
|
From baseline to 12 months
|
|
Patient centered outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Patient centered outcomes including pain, bleeding, swelling, change in daily activities at 7, 14, and 30 days postoperatively, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) This measurement ranges from 0-10 (0 being better and 10 being worse).
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maria L Geisinger, DDS, MS, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-300016397
- UAB Periodontology (Other Identifier: University of Alabama at Birmingham)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.