Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy With Focused Object-Directed Attention System
Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy With Focused Object-Directed Attention for Neuro-Rehabilitation
In this study, we hypothesized that Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy with Focused Object-Directed Attention (VRMTFOA) would yield superior therapeutic effects compared to conventional Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy (VRMT) in individuals with unilateral stroke.
The aim of this study is to compare the immediate effects of a single session of VRMT, VRMTFOA, and VRMTFOA with auditory feedback on upper extremity function and brain activity in stroke patients.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Hsiu-Yun Hsu, Ph.D
- Phone Number: 2669 886-6-2353535
- Email: hyhsu@mail.ncku.edu.tw
Study Locations
-
-
Taiwan
-
Tainan, Taiwan, Taiwan, 704
- National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke with unilateral side involved; A score of Mini-mental state examination greater than 24 for proving higher mental function; Time of onset > 6 months before treatment begins; and Premorbid right-handedness.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe vision impairment; Major cognitive-perceptual deficit; Other brain disease.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy Group
30 minutes of Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy combined with 20 minutes of conventional task-oriented therapy.
|
Motor training targeted to goals that are relevant to the functional needs of the patient
|
|
Experimental: Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy with Focused Object-Directed Attention (VRMTFOA)
30 minutes of Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy with Focused Object-Directed Attention combined with 20 minutes of conventional task-oriented therapy.
|
Motor training targeted to goals that are relevant to the functional needs of the patient
|
|
Active Comparator: VRMTFOA with auditory feedback
30 minutes of VRMTFOA with auditory feedback combined with 20 minutes of conventional task-oriented therapy.
|
Motor training targeted to goals that are relevant to the functional needs of the patient
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the result of Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) for motor function of upper extremity test
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
Each item is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (2 points for the detail being performed completely, 1 point for the detail being performed partially, and 0 for the detail not being performed).
The maximum motor performance score is 66 points for the upper extremity.
|
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the result of Box and blocks test
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
The score is the number of blocks carried from one box to the other in one minute.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
|
Change in the result of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
The Semmes-Weinstein monofilamenttest examines the cutaneous pressure threshold, range from 1.65-6.65.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
|
Change in the result of Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
Semi-structured interview examine how much and how well the subject uses their more-affected arm for 30 ADLs.
Score range from 0-5.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
|
Change in the result of Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
Muscle tone is defined by assess muscle tone by evaluating resistance to passive stretch, reflecting the level of spasticity, with scores ranging from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigidity in flexion or extension).
|
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
|
|
Surface electromyography (sEMG)
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks
|
Change in the root mean square (RMS) of the EMG signal was computed to quantify the change of muscle activation.
|
baseline, 9 weeks
|
|
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
Assess overall clinical change, rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
|
9 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- A-ER-114-469
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
NCT07208422RecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After Stroke
-
NCT07224178RecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, Embolic
-
NCT07433972Not yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Survivors
-
NCT07236216RecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke Patient
-
NCT04956185RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic
-
NCT05046106Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
NCT07199322Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke Ischemic
-
NCT07353203CompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Exoskeleton
-
NCT06127602RecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, Cerebrovascular
-
NCT05815368RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic
Clinical Trials on task-oriented training
-
NCT06877819Completed
-
NCT05771805Completed
-
NCT06625294Enrolling by invitation
-
NCT07494357Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06303050Completed
-
NCT07160114CompletedStroke | Chronic Stroke Patient
-
NCT01910454Completed
-
NCT05158543Completed
-
NCT06111924Recruiting