Glucagon-like Peptide 2 (GLP-2) in Undernourished Women Improving From Histology-Confirmed Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED) (GAME)

April 12, 2026 updated by: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether teduglutide, a medicine that helps the intestine heal, can improve environmental enteric dysfunction in undernourished women aged 18 to 35 years living in urban slums of Dhaka.

Environmental enteric dysfunction is a long-lasting condition of the small intestine. It causes inflammation and poor absorption of nutrients. Many people with this condition do not have clear symptoms, but it can make undernutrition worse. At present, there is no proven treatment for this condition.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • Does taking teduglutide for 30 days improve damage to the small intestine, as seen on intestinal biopsy?
  • Does teduglutide improve blood and stool markers related to gut inflammation and nutrient absorption?

Participants will:

  • Receive nutritional support at the start of the study
  • Undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to confirm environmental enteric dysfunction
  • Receive a daily injection of teduglutide under the skin for 30 days
  • Undergo repeat endoscopy and laboratory tests after treatment to assess changes in gut health The results of this study will help researchers understand whether teduglutide may be a useful treatment for environmental enteric dysfunction in undernourished adult women and will guide future, larger studies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background:

Burden: Recent studies indicated an association between undernutrition and Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED) with more than 90% of undernourished women in Dhaka slum having histo-pathological evidence of EED.

Knowledge gap: Currently, there is no available treatment for this condition. Teduglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analog, has been shown to improve damaged intestinal mucosa, improve villi height, absorptive capacity, and reduce mucosal inflammation. A recent study among children in Zambia and Zimbabwe with malnutrition enteropathy demonstrated significant improvement of EED features with no adverse effect following teduglutide treatment.

Relevance: Given the fundamental structural and functional alterations of the intestine due to EED, GLP-2 analogues such as teduglutide could significantly revolutionize treatment strategies. However, teduglutide has not yet been trialed in adults with EED.

Hypothesis: Daily treatment Glucagon-like Peptide 2 (GLP-2) Analog teduglutide for thirty days will improve histologic and biomarkers features of EED in undernourished women with biopsy-proven EED.

Objectives: To examine the efficacy of daily sub-cutaneous glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) analog teduglutide treatment for 30 days in undernourished women with histology-confirmed EED on improving histology features of EED (a continuous score on villus height, crypt depth, and immune infiltration) (Primary objective) and biomarkers of inflammation, intestinal permeability, enterocyte mass, and absorption (secondary objectives).

Methods: This is a community-based, single-arm, open-label, pilot intervention study. Undernourished women aged 18-35 years with a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 16 to 18.5 kg/m² will be enrolled from Bauniabadh and adjacent slum areas in Mirpur, Dhaka. Initially, participants will participate in a 60-day on-site nutrition intervention consisting of one egg (boiled or fried), 150 mL milk, two chapati/flat bread/bread with vegetable/lentil soup, and one tablet containing the 15-component UNIMMAP MMS (FullCare, SMC, Dhaka). Participants who do not respond adequately to this intervention (BMI < 18.5 and at least 10% improvement of baseline BMI) and who will not have any secondary causes of malnutrition will undergo an upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy and histologic evaluation for EED. Participants with histology-confirmed EED, who will provide consent will receive daily sub-cutaneous teduglutide (0.05 mg/kg/day) treatment for 30 days. A second UGI endoscopy will be done after the endoscopy and the biomarkers will assessed at different time points.

Sample Size: 55 participants will receive teduglutide treatment and at least 30 undernourished women with histology-confirmed EED will complete the study. To identify women with EED with a rationale to perform UGI endoscopies, and expected drop outs, we will enroll 500 low-BMI women for nutrition intervention. An additional 30 normal-BMI (20-24.9 kg/m² will be enrolled for aminoacid absorption studies.

Primary end point: A continuous measure, based on the presence of established histopathologic indicators of EED, including immune cell infiltration, reduced villus height, and increased crypt depth. Each feature present will contribute one point to the composite score, resulting in a total EED score ranging from 0 to 7 for participants undergoing EGD. A higher score indicates the presence of more severe EED.

Secondary end point: Histological recovery from EED, as indicated by reduced infiltration of immune cells, increased villus height, and reduced crypt depth. Recovery from EED will be assessed using a four-level ordinal outcome scale, ("no EED," "mild EED," "moderate EED," and "severe EED") at baseline and after treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
55

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Bangladeshi women, aged 18-35 years

  • BMI between 16 kg/m2 to 18.5 kg/m2
  • No antibiotics for 1 month
  • Willing to sign the consent form
  • Willing to receive food and multiple micronutrient supplementation for 2 months
  • Willing to receive daily one-month sub-cutaneous GLP 2 analog, Teduglutide treatment
  • Willing to undergo endoscopy and biopsy, twice, before and after intervention, if failed to respond to nutrition intervention and who did not have other chronic or acute diseases that may cause malnutrition
  • Willing to provide biological samples during the study period of 4 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe anemia (<8 g/dl), known case of TB, and other chronic diseases, including diabetes mellitus or any congenital disorder or deformity
  • Pregnancy, lactation, drug abuse, known psychiatric disorders
  • High clinical suspicion of cancer or other chronic or acute diseases that may cause malnutrition.
  • Known allergy to any components of nutrition intervention or any GI polyp
  • Ongoing episode of diarrhea, history of persistent diarrhea in the past month or history of acute diarrhea in the past 7 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Teduglutide Treatment Arm
Sub-cutaneous Teduglutide treatment (0.05 mg/kg/day)
Drug: Teduglutide 0.05 dose
  • 30 days of daily sub-cutaneous Teduglutide treatment (0.05 mg/kg/day) (N= 55)
  • Monitoring schedule during and after teduglutide treatment
  • Surveillance visits with a physician: monitoring of adverse events: day 1, day 7, day 15 and day 30
  • Biological sample collection for biomarkers: mid-line (day 15), end-line (day-30 or Day 31), and day 90 post-intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite EED (Environmental Enteric Dysfunction) Histopathologic Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 days after teduglutide treatment
The primary outcome is the EED score, a continuous measure derived from histomorphological features of the intestinal mucosa obtained through upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) with mucosal biopsy. The score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating more severe intestinal damage. The score will be calculated before treatment and after 30 days of daily subcutaneous teduglutide administration to assess changes in intestinal histology.
Baseline and 30 days after teduglutide treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PR-25002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

It is undecided whether individual participant data (IPD) will be shared because the study is a small pilot trial, and plans for data sharing will be determined after study completion, considering participant privacy and consent.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Environmental Enteric Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Teduglutide 0.05 dose

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings