Evaluating Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix for Prevention of Superficial Radial Nerve Morbidity Following Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest

July 7, 2026 updated by: John M Le, University of Alabama at Birmingham

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Evaluating Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix for Prevention of Superficial Radial Nerve Morbidity Following Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest

Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction is commonly used for head and neck defects but is associated with donor-site morbidity, including neuropathic pain and sensory disturbance. This randomized controlled pilot study evaluates whether placement of a soft tissue matrix over the superficial radial nerve at the donor site reduces neuropathic pain and improves sensory outcomes compared to standard closure alone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) harvest is associated with significant donor-site morbidity, including neuropathic pain, hypoesthesia, and functional impairment related to superficial radial nerve irritation and postoperative scar formation. Current donor-site management focuses on wound closure and healing but does not directly address nerve protection.

Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix is a human-derived biologic material designed for soft tissue reinforcement and protection. Its use as a barrier over surgically manipulated nerves is biologically plausible but has not been studied in this clinical context.

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled pilot trial designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of Avive+ placement over the superficial radial nerve during RFFF harvest. Subjects will be randomized to standard closure versus Avive+ placement plus standard closure. Outcomes will focus on neuropathic pain, sensory function, and wound complications.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: John M Le, MD, DDS
  • Phone Number: 205-975-6356
  • Email: jle@uabmc.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:
          • John M Le, MD, DDS
          • Phone Number: 205-975-6356

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Undergoing RFFF for head and neck reconstruction
  • Treated at University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Willing to comply with follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reconstruction using a non-RFFF free flap
  • Pre-existing ipsilateral radial nerve neuropathy
  • Prior ipsilateral forearm surgery affecting nerve anatomy
  • Active donor-site infection
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease
  • Inability to complete follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard Closure (Control)
  • Standard RFFF harvest
  • Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor-site closure
Procedure: Standard Closure (Control)
  • Standard RFFF harvest
  • Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor-site closure
Experimental: Avive+ Intervention
  • Standard RFFF harvest
  • Placement of Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix over the superficial radial nerve
  • STSG donor-site closure
Procedure: Avive+ Intervention
  • Standard RFFF harvest
  • Placement of Avive+ Soft Tissue Matrix over the superficial radial nerve
  • STSG donor-site closure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinically Significant Neuropathic Pain at 6 Months - DN4 score
Time Frame: 6 months
A DN4 questionnaire score of 4 or higher out of 10 indicates a high probability of neuropathic pain. This validated tool, which can be viewed in this DN4 Questionnaire consists of seven patient-interview questions and three clinician-examination items, with a total score distinguishing neuropathic from non-neuropathic pain. A score greater than or equal to 4 is considered positive for neuropathic pain
6 months
Clinically Significant Neuropathic Pain at 6 Months - Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is used to measure pain, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst pain imaginable"
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Pain Severity
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Commonly used in healthcare to measure pain, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst pain imaginable"
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Average Sensory Function with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
The Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test is a quick, non-invasive, and objective clinical exam used to evaluate nerve function by measuring skin sensitivity to light touch and pressure.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Average Sensory Function with Static 2-point discrimination
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Static 2-point discrimination (2PD) is a clinical test measuring the minimum distance at which a patient can perceive two simultaneous touch stimuli as distinct, rather than one, using a device like an aesthesiometer or disk-criminator.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Percentage of Skin Graft Loss
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Measured by percentage of 0-100% total graft loss.
up to 3 months
Number of Participants that develop Infection
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Measured by presence of cellulitis/purulence requiring antibiotics and/or surgical debridement with antibiotics.
Up to 3 months
Number of participants with Tendon Exposure
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Measured by number of participants with visual appearance of tendon exposure.
up to 3 months
Change in QuickDASH score
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months
The QuickDASH is an 11-item questionnaire assessing upper limb musculoskeletal disability, scoring from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe).
3, 6, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: John M Le, MD, DDS, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 7, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB-300016607
  • UAB (Other Identifier: UAB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings