Optimizing Smart Technology for Addiction Recovery (STAR)
Optimizing Algorithmic Feedback About Lapse Risk for Trust, Engagement, and Clinical Outcomes for Alcohol Use Disorder
The goal of this study is to develop a machine-learning guided recovery messaging system. The main question it aims to answer is can messages be used to:
- help people to improve their health
- make changes in people's lives to address alcohol and substance use
Participants will:
- complete surveys
- use a recovery-support digital therapeutic system
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Susan Wanta
- Phone Number: 608-262-0387
- Email: schneck2@wisc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Thea Blum
- Phone Number: 608-262-1362
- Email: tblm4@wisc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53706
- Recruiting
- University Of Wisconsin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- meet criteria for alcohol use disorder with at least moderate severity (>= 4 DSM-5 criteria)
- in initial remission with most recent use of alcohol between 1 week and 3 months in the past
- able to read English
- have a smartphone and cellular plan that supports STAR use (Apple iOS or Android)
Exclusion Criteria:
- medical or psychiatric co-morbidities that preclude use of a smartphone
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: STAR
Participants will use the STAR automated recover support system for 4 months
|
Automated recovery support messaging system for participants with alcohol use disorder (AUD), paired with a machine learning guided relapse risk prediction model.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant engagement with the STAR system
Time Frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
|
Measured as days of engagement with the recovery system.
|
data collected at 2 and 4 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of heavy drinking days in the previous 28 days
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
Data collected via Timeline Followback (TLFB) conducted by interview at 0, 2, and 4 months.
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) lapse reports will be used to supplement the TLFB.
These are daily surveys where the participant answers the question "have you had a drink you have not yet reported?"
(Yes/No).
If yes they are asked to indicate the date of their drinking and how many drinks they consumed that day (less than 1, 1-2, 3, 4, 5-6, 7-8, over 8).
Four or more drinks are considered heavy drinking days for women and greater than 4 drinks are considered heavy drinking days for men.
|
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
|
Number of drinking days in the previous 28 days
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
Data collected via Timeline Followback (TLFB) conducted by interview at 0, 2, and 4 months.
EMA lapse reports will be used to supplement the TLFB.
These are daily surveys where the participant answers the question "have you had a drink you have not yet reported?"
(Yes/No).
If yes, they are asked to indicate the date of their drinking.
|
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
|
Flourishing Scale Score
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
10 items rated on 0-10 Likert scale where lower scores represent worse functioning and higher scores represent better functioning.
Total possible range of scores is from 0-100.
|
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
7 items rated on 0-3 Likert scale where lower scores represent better functioning and higher scores represent worse functioning.
Total possible range of scores is from 0-21.
|
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
|
Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC) Score: Total Score
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
1-4 Likert scale.
Some items are reverse coded but higher total scores represent better functioning and lower total scores represent worse functioning.
Scored as total score 4-56.
|
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
|
Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC) Score: Each Domain
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
1-4 Likert scale.
Some items are reverse coded but higher total scores represent better functioning and lower total scores represent worse functioning.
Scored in 4 domains (social, physical, human, and cultural), each from 1-14.
|
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PQH-9) Score
Time Frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
9 items rated on 1-4 Likert scale.
Total possible range of scores from 0-27 where lower scores represent better functioning and higher scores represent worse functioning.
|
data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
|
|
Digital Working Alliance Inventory (D-WAI)
Time Frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
|
Six items rated on 1-7 Likert scale.
Scored in 3 domains (Goals, Tasks, Bonds, each with 2 items) with possible scores from 2 to 14 where higher scores represent greater alliance with the STAR system in that domain.
|
data collected at 2 and 4 months
|
|
Message Usefulness
Time Frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
|
Seven items rated on 1-7 Likert scale.
Total possible scores from 7 to 49 where higher scores represent greater valuation of STAR message usefulness.
|
data collected at 2 and 4 months
|
|
Trust of the System
Time Frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
|
Ten items rated on 1-7 Likert scale.
Total possible scores from 10 to 70 where higher scores represent greater trust in the STAR system.
|
data collected at 2 and 4 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John Curtin, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-0869
- A487400 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- 1R01AA031762-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- Protocol Version 4/22/2026 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.