Physical Activity in Persons With Parkinson's Disease (ActivPARK)

May 13, 2026 updated by: Erika Franzén, Karolinska Institutet

Physical Activity in Persons With Parkinson's Disease - a Longitudinal Cohort Study

This project aims to identify why some people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) become less physically active, and which factors support or hinder activity. Understanding these factors is essential for developing person centred interventions and effective support that can be implemented in routine healthcare. A national, multicentre longitudinal cohort study will be conducted including approx 450 PwPD from five Swedish regions (including the internal pilot NCT06901869). Physical activity will be measured objectively with activity monitors, combined with clinical assessments and digital questionnaires over four years. The primary outcome is physical activity level (accelerometer measured decline), and exposure variables include physical, cognitive, disease specific, social, environmental, motivational, and personal factors. Data collection involves clinical tests, questionnaires, accelerometer data, and patient reported experiences.

This is a continuation of an internal pilot study NCT06901869. The study will enable early identification of those at risk for declining activity and guide development of person centred, evidence based interventions. Long term, it aims to integrate activity monitoring and risk factor screening into routine care to improve health and quality of life for PwPD.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Compliance Office Karolinska Insitutet
  • Phone Number: +46852480000
  • Email: compliance@ki.se

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

People with Parkinson's disease with mild to severe severity (Hoehn & Yahr 1-4) of all ages

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • Hoehn & Yahr 1 to 4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hoehn & Yahr 5 (i.e. wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided)
  • Unable to perform critical physical activity and clinical assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
People with Parkinson´'s disease
No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity - low and moderate intensity
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
The primary outcome is changes over time in PA (i.e. low + moderate-vigorous intensity PA in time spent per day) measured with accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, US) during 7 days in people with Parkinson's disease everyday life.
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity - total vector magnitude
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
The secondary outcomes are change over time in total vector magnitude measured with accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, US) during 7 days in people with Parkinson's disease everyday life.
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Physical activity - low intensity
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
The secondary outcomes are change in time spent in low intensity physical activity per day measured with accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, US) during 7 days in people with Parkinson's disease everyday life.
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Physical activity - moderate high intensity
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
The secondary outcomes are change in time spent in moderate-vigorous physical activity per day measured with accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, US) during 7 days in people with Parkinson's disease everyday life.
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Physical activity- sedentary
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
The secondary outcomes are change in sedentary time per day measured with accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, US) during 7 days in people with Parkinson's disease everyday life.
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Physical activity - steps
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
The secondary outcomes are change in steps per day measured with accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, US) during 7 days in people with Parkinson's disease everyday life.
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive performance
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), 0-25, higher score = better
Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Disease severity, Parkinsons symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up

Disease severity measured with the Movement Disorders Society -Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) parts 1 to 4.

Higher scores = worse/more symptoms

Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Gait
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Gait speed in m/s measured with the 10 meter walking test or through gait analysis.
Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Balance performance
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Assessed with the Mini-BESTest. Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test a rating scale for dynamic balance incorporating 14 different balance and gait items that were assessed by a physical therapist on a scale from 0-2. 0-28 points with higher scores indicating better balance control
Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Assessed with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), 0-24 on the depression and anxiety part respectively. Lower score=better
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Motivation
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Assessed with the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ 4), a 28-item survey that measures exercise motivation. The questionnaire uses a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from one to seven. Maximum 196. Higher scores = higher motivation
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Assessed with the Self-efficacy and motivation for exercise/physical activity (ESES). 10 questions rated on a 4 point Likert scale. Maximun 40 points, higher scores= better self-efficacy
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Physical activity history and preferences,
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-made questions on physical activity history and preferences
Baseline
Self assessed cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Assessed with Executive function questionnaire (DEX), 20 items scored 1 to 4, max 80, more scores= worse
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Non-Motor Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMSQ), 30 questions with yes/no answer. More yes answers = more non-motor symptoms
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Walking ability- self rated
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
WALK-12G questionnaire, 0 and 42 points, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived walking difficulties (higher=worse)
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Freezing of gait - self-assessed
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Freezing of gait questionnaire (FOGQsa), 6 questions/items, scored 1 to 5 (higher=worse)
Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Balance confidence
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Activities specific balance confidence (ABC scale), 16 items which is scored 1 to 10 and then divided by 16. 0-100%, higher % = better
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Parkinson's Fatigue Scale (PFS-16), 16 items scored 1 to 5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree . more points/score= worse.
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Disability
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up
World health organization (WHO) disability assessment schedule (Whodas 2.0), 12 self-assessed questions (12 to 60) more points=worse
Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Sleep
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease - Sleep (SCOPA-SLEEP), 4 parts, A-2 questions, B-5 questions , C-1 question and D- 6 questions. Higher= worse
Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Self-rated pain
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Assessed with visual analog scale, VAS from 0 to 100
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ39). The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) assesses how often people with Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living (mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communications and bodily discomfort). The sum score is as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. Higher is better
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Wellbeing
Time Frame: Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
The WHO- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), 5 questions ranging from 0 to 5, 0-25, higher=better
Baseline and yearly follow-ups for 3 years
Nutrition
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Mini Nutritional Assessment, max 14. higher = better
Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Socioeconomic status
Time Frame: Baseline
Education and income level.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erika Franzén, Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4-438/2024
  • 2024-07526-01 (Other Identifier: Swedish Ethical Review Authority)
  • 06901869 (Other Identifier: Clinical Trials registration -pilot study)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to Swedish and EU personal data legislation but are available from the principal investigator on reasonable request. Any sharing of data will be regulated via a data transfer and user agreement with the recipient, provided that the recipient has an approved ethics application.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

We plan to share this when applicable on OSF or similar

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to Swedish and EU personal data legislation but are available from the principal investigator on reasonable request. Any sharing of data will be regulated via a data transfer and user agreement with the recipient.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Search Similar Trials