Comparison of Interrupted Suturing Versus Continuous Suturing in Laparotomy Wound Closed.
Comparison of Outcome of Emergency Laparotomy Wound Closed by Interrupted Suturing Versus Continuous Suturing.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 46000
- Benazir Bhutto Hospital/Rawalpindi Medical University and Allied Hospitals
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of either gender
- Aged 18-60 years
- Undergoing emergency laparotomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unfit for surgery
- History of diabetes
- Immuno-compromised
- Pregnant/lactating mothers
- Malignancy
- Very low or very high body mass index (< 15kg/m2 or > 30kg/m2)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group-A
Patients went through interrupted closure with Smead Jones technique using prolene 1.
|
Patients went through interrupted closure with Smead Jones technique using prolene 1.
|
|
Experimental: Group-B
Patients went through continuous closure with prolene 1.
|
Patients went through continuous closure with prolene 1.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Wound dehiscence
Time Frame: 10 days
|
The frequency of patients who experienced spontaneous opening of the midline laparotomy sutures within 10 days of surgery was noted.
|
10 days
|
|
Wound infection
Time Frame: 10 days
|
The frequency of patients who showed the presence of pus or any discharge at the surgical wound site, which was accompanied by pain, fever, raised white blood cell count (> 11000), swelling, and erythema, was noted.
|
10 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Farhan Ahmed, Benazir Bhutto Hospital/Rawalpindi Medical University and Allied Hospitals, Rawalpindi
- Study Director: Usman Qureshi, FCPS, Holy Family Hospital/Rawalpindi Medical University and Allied Hospitals, Rawalpindi
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Dr-Farhan-Rawalpindi
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.