A Study in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma for IBI3003

May 28, 2026 updated by: Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.

A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing IBI3003 Versus Treatment Per Investigator's Choice in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well IBI3003 works when compared with the investigator's choice regimen (DPd or PVd)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is an open, multicenter, randomized controlled phase III clinical trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of IBI3003 compared to the investigator's choice regimen (DPd or PVd) in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have previously received 1-4 lines of therapy and have been exposed to three classes of drugs (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies). The plan is to enroll approximately 255 participants, who will be randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group in a 2:1 ratio. Approximately 170 participants in the experimental group will receive IBI3003 treatment, while about 85 participants in the control group will receive the investigator's choice of treatment (DPd or PVd). Participants in the experimental group can discontinue medication for observation after meeting the criteria for stopping treatment. During the discontinuation period, if they meet the re-treatment criteria, following discussion between the investigator and the sponsor, and based on the participant's preference, IBI3003 re-treatment may be given until the criteria for terminating treatment are met.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
255

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 132101

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria：

  1. Age ≥18 years.
  2. Documented initial diagnosis of multiple myeloma according to IMWG diagnostic criteria.

  3. At least one of the following measurable disease indicators:

    • Serum M-protein ≥ 5 g/L（For IgA and IgD subtypes, it is recommended to use quantitative immunoglobulin measurements instead of M protein）
    • Urine M-protein ≥200 mg/24h
    • Serum free light chain (FLC) test: affected FLC level ≥100 mg/L and abnormal serum FLC ratio (<0.26 or >1.65)
  4. Life expectancy ≥3 months.
  5. Fertile females and sexually active fertile males must agree to use highly effective contraception (failure rate <1% per year) during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of the investigational drug. For participants in the clinical trial, contraceptive measures must comply with local regulations regarding the use of contraceptive methods. Females and males must agree not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes) or sperm during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of the investigational drug.
  6. Willing and able to comply with the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria：

  1. Previous treatment with any BCMA-targeted therapy and any GPRC5D-targeted therapy. Patients who have received either BCMA-targeted or GPRC5D-targeted therapy are allowed to participate in the study.
  2. Known active CNS involvement or exhibits clinical signs of meningeal involvement of multiple myeloma.
  3. Spinal cord compression that leads to limited self-care ability occurs within six months prior to informed consent or is expected to occur in the near future.
  4. Have history of primary immunodeficiency.
  5. Have history of organ transplantation.
  6. Have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation within 6 months before the first administration of the study drug, or have received autologous stem cell transplantation within 3 months before the first administration of the study drug.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: the investigator's choice regimen (DPd or PVd)
participants will receive DPd or PVd until death, disease progression, initiation of new anti-tumor therapy, withdrawal of informed consent to participate in the study, or other reasons for discontinuation of study treatment, whichever occurs first.
Drug: Pomalidomide Capsules
  1. The DPd treatment regimen, one cycle every 28 days: Pomalidomide 4mg/d orally, on days 1-21;
  2. The PVd treatment regimen, one cycle every 21 days: Pomalidomide 4 mg/d orally, on days 1-14 of each treatment cycle;
Other Names:
  • P
Drug: Bortezomib for Injection
The PVd treatment regimen, with one cycle every 21 days: Bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of cycles 1-8, and on days 1 and 8 from cycle 9 onwards.
Other Names:
  • V
Drug: Daratumumab Injection (Subcutaneous Injection)
The DPd treatment regimen, one cycle every 28 days: on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1 and 2; on days 1 and 15 from cycles 3-6; and on day 1 from cycle 7 onwards.
Other Names:
  • D
Experimental: IBI3003
participants will receive IBI3003 until death, disease progression, initiation of new anti-tumor therapy, withdrawal of informed consent to participate in the study, or other reasons for discontinuation of study treatment, whichever occurs first.
Drug: IBI3003
According to body weight
Other Names:
  • trispecific antibody

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFS assessed by independent review committee
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to either PD or death, whichever comes first. Disease progression will be determined according to the IMWG response criteria
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFS assessed by investigator
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to either PD or death, whichever comes first. Disease progression will be determined according to the IMWG response criteria
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Negativity rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Defined as the proportion of participants achieving MRD-negative status
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Sustained MRD negativity rate
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Defined as the proportion of participants achieving MRD-negative status and maintaining it for at least 1 year
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
6-month MRD negativity rate.
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
The proportion of participants achieving a response of CR or better and MRD-negative status at 6 months post-randomization
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
12-month MRD negativity rate
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
The proportion of participants achieving a response of CR or better and MRD-negative status at 12 months post-randomization
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Objective response rate
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve PR or better prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy in accordance with the IMWG criteria
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Complete response or better rate
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Complete response or better rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR or better prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy in accordance with the IMWG criteria
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Very good partial response or better rate
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Very good partial response or better rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve very good partial response or better prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy in accordance with the IMWG criteria
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Duration of response
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
DoR is defined as the time interval between the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease according to the IMWG response criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Time to response
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first tumor response assessment of PR or better among participants with a best overall response of PR or better
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Time to best response
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented Best Overall Response (BOR) among participants with a best overall response of PR or better
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Time to next treatment
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Defined as the time from initiation of study drug treatment to initiation of next-line therapy
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Overall survival
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death due to any cause
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Number of Participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse events (TEAE) by Severity
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Severity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. Grading of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) according to the ASTCT consensus
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Number of Participants with Treatment-related Adverse Event (TRAE) by Severity
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Severity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. Grading of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) according to the ASTCT consensus
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Number of Participants with Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) by Severity
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Severity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. Grading of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) according to the ASTCT consensus
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Defined as the percentage of participants with SAE
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in symptoms, functioning, and HRQoL as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 score will be reported
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores
Time Frame: up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug
Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in symptoms, functioning, and HRQoL as assessed by MySIm-Q score will be reported
up to 24 months after the last enrolled participant receives the first dose of study drug

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CIBI3003A301

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Pomalidomide Capsules

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings