Study of Proteomic Factors in Patients With Severe Dry Eye Syndrome Treated With Autologous Serum Eye Drops. (Prot-CSA)

June 2, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Study of Proteomic Factors in Patients With Severe Dry Eye Syndrome Treated With Autologous Serum Eye Drops. Single-center Study.

Dry eye syndrome is a multifactorial pathology of the ocular surface. Epidemiological studies report a prevalence of 15% in adults aged between 50 and 95. Depending on the severity of the disease, different treatment strategies may be proposed. The use of autologous serum eye drops (AS) represents an interesting therapeutic alternative for the most severe forms of the disease, due to the serum's composition, which is similar to that of tears. The mechanism of action of AS is still controversial, but is probably multifactorial and seems to be based on growth factors, vitamin factors and anti-inflammatory factors. The clinical response of patients could be dependent on the protein composition of the eye drops. The investigators are aiming to highlight a difference in serum protein composition that could explain the differences in clinical response between patients treated with autologous serum eye drops and to identify the proteins that would be involved in a clinical response or non-response.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marie-Caroline TRONE, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Emera CHHUY, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elodie JACQUEROUX, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Freddy MOUNSEF, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Raphaël AUGER, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18 years
  • Patients with severe dry eye with an Oxford score > 1
  • Patients with dry eye syndrome refractory to conventional treatments: tear substitutes, immunosuppressive eye drops or corticosteroids.
  • AS-naïve patients followed by an ophthalmologist at Saint-Etienne University Hospital
  • Patients affiliated to or entitled under a social security scheme
  • Patients who have received informed information about the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe ocular dryness due to a genetic disease
  • Patients not under the care of an ophthalmologist at Saint-Etienne University Hospital.
  • Patients not eligible for treatment with AS (pregnant women, anaemia, current infection, progressive disease, serological results contraindicating blood sampling).
  • Patients under protective measures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: All patients newly treated with autologous serum eye drops
To identify proteins potentially associated with clinical improvement in severe dry eye syndrome, as determined by the Oxford score.
Other: Autologous serum eye drops
The proteins contained in the autologous serum eye drops will be screened and the proteins judged to be the most relevant will be quantified.
Other: Collecting data from the medical record

We will collect the following medical data :

  • Oxford score
  • OSDI score
  • Causes of dry eye syndrome
  • drug treatment history

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To identify and assess the relative abundance of proteins present in autologous serum-based eye drops in responders and non-responders after 6 months of treatment.
Time Frame: Month 6
Proteomic profiles will be determined by a non-targeted analysis of autologous serum eye drops using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry. This technique makes it possible to identify as many proteins as possible in a sample, without a pre-established list of proteins to look for. The quantity of a protein is expressed as a variation in abundance, or expression level, between two different states (e.g. responder/non-responder, etc.), enabling us to define an abundance ratio between our two groups of patients. Patients with a clinical response at 6 months, defined as an improvement in Oxford score of greater than or equal to 1 point, will be considered responders.
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in dry eye symptoms after 6 months of treatment with autologous serum eye drops.
Time Frame: From baseline to Month 6
This improvement will be defined by a change in the OSDI score of 11 points. The OSDI score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe ocular surface disease symptoms and a worse outcome. A change of 11 points corresponds to the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID).
From baseline to Month 6
Change in relative protein abundance in autologous serum eye drops.
Time Frame: Month 6
Change in relative protein abundance in autologous serum eye drops measured by mass spectrometry in non-responding patients.
Month 6
Measurement of concentrations of selected proteins in autologous serum eye drops.
Time Frame: Month 6
Protein concentrations will be quantitatively measured using protein-specific ELISA assays for each analyte.
Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Elodie JACQUEROUX, MD, CHU de Saint-Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 24CH169
  • ANSM (Other Identifier: 2025-A00293-46)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Autologous serum eye drops

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings