Allogeneic Versus Autologous Serum Eye Drops (AVAnS)

April 3, 2019 updated by: Sanquin Research & Blood Bank Divisions

Allogeneic Versus Autologous Serum Eye Drops: a Double-blind Randomized Cross Over Trial

Serum eye drops (SEDs) are used to treat patients with extreme dry eyes and other corneal defects. Serum is used in severe ophthalmic cases where conventional eye drops (artificial tears) have insufficient effect. The use of SEDs in dry eye patients usually has a rapid effect. Most patients claim the effect to be instantaneous, and all symptoms improve within 48 hours.

There is evidence suggesting that substances in serum may help in the healing of epithelial defects, such as epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, fibronectin, and/or vitamin A. However, the precise serum factor responsible for alleviating the patient's complaints is currently not known. Commonly, autologous SEDs are used, but they are replaced more and more by allogeneic SEDs prepared from donor serum.

Allogeneic SED are derived from healthy voluntary, non-remunerated male donors with blood group AB. The use of allogeneic SED could provide blood bank controlled quality, a safer product in larger quantities that is quickly available for each patient.

No double-blind randomized trials are known to exist to detect a difference in result between the effect of allogeneic SED or autologous SED. This pilot study is intended to obtain insight in the ability of autologous and allogeneic SEDs to improve patient dry eye sensation. Our hypothesis is that autologous SEDs (in a 1:1 dilution with saline) result in an improvement of the patient dry eye sensation, while allogeneic SEDs (in a 1:1 dilution with saline) do not.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Serum eye drops (SEDs) are used to treat patients with dry eyes and other diseases, like corneal defects. SEDs are used in ophthalmic cases where conventional eye drops have insufficient effect. The use of SEDs in dry eye patients usually has a rapid effect. Most patients claim the effect to be instantaneous and all symptoms improve by 48 hours [1].

There is evidence suggesting that serum may enhance corneal epithelial healing [2]. Some biologically active substances are thought to contribute to the positive effects, like epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, fibronectin, and vitamin A.

Autologous SEDs are used internationally on a regular basis, and allogeneic SEDs are becoming increasingly popular. In the Netherlands, only autologous SEDs are in use.

Obtaining autologous SED is an organizational burden. Patient-related problems are old age, travelling, or travelling with low vision and sometimes immobility due to other diseases. Sometimes venipuncture is impossible due to poor access. Medical conditions such as inability to donate large amounts of whole blood due to previous cerebrovascular accidents or cardiovascular disease, anemia, or use of certain medication may prevent collection of blood for SEDs. Patients affected with hematological diseases, bacterial, viral or fungal infections are also unsuitable for production of autologous SEDs. In 2.3% of donors for preparing autologous SEDs, a systemic infection can be detected [3]. In the UK, use of autologous SED is restricted largely due to cost [4]. Logistically, it is a problem that it takes time as well as joint effort of several departments in the hospital to prepare the SEDs, causing considerable waiting time for the patient. Further, the use of allogeneic drops allows immediate access to SEDs in case time is limited to prevent corneal scars, ulcers, infiltrates or even transplants, epithelial defects or low vision due to epithelial surface disease.

Allogeneic SEDs are derived from healthy donors and are produced by a blood bank facility. Blood banks are experienced and equipped to produce blood products in a good manufacturing practice (GMP) environment. They can perform quality control, and are able to produce larger quantities that are quickly available. For our study, donors with blood group AB will be selected to ensure ABO compatibility. Donors are further selected to be males that never had a blood transfusion to minimize anti-HLA titers.

No prospective double blind randomized cross-over trials are known to exist to detect a difference in result between the effect of allogeneic SED or autologous SED for ocular surface disease. This pilot study is intended to obtain insight in the ability of autologous and allogeneic SEDs to improve patient dry eye sensation. Our hypothesis is that autologous SEDs (in a 1:1 dilution with saline) result in an improvement of the patient dry eye sensation, while allogeneic SEDs (in a 1:1 dilution with saline) do not.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chronic dry eye syndrome
  • age 18 or higher
  • expected to benefit from SEDs
  • can donate sufficient blood to prepare autologous SEDs
  • meet the donor guidelines of Sanquin (except for age, donation frequency and hemoglobin concentration)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • has corneal lesions more than punctates
  • has a history of unstable Herpes simplex virus (HSV) keratitis or is treated for HSV keratitis
  • currently already uses SEDs
  • pregnancy, lactating, or intending the become pregnant in the next 3 months
  • unable or unwilling to give informed consent
  • active (systemic) microbial infection
  • immuno-deficiency
  • poor venous access

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Subjects assigned to this arm will receive autologous serum eye drops first, followed by a washout period and then allogeneic serum eye drops.
Autologous serum eye drop doses will be 6 times daily in each eye
Allogeneic serum eye drop doses will be 6 times daily in each eye
Experimental: Group B
Subjects assigned to this arm will receive allogeneic serum eye drops first, followed by a washout period and then autologous serum eye drops.
Autologous serum eye drop doses will be 6 times daily in each eye
Allogeneic serum eye drop doses will be 6 times daily in each eye

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: One month after starting with serum eye drops
Normalized OSDI score
One month after starting with serum eye drops

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tear production (Schirmer's test)
Time Frame: One month after starting with serum eye drops
Millimeter
One month after starting with serum eye drops
Tear break up time
Time Frame: One month after starting with serum eye drops
Number of seconds before a dry spot appears in the tear film
One month after starting with serum eye drops
Corneal punctates
Time Frame: One month after starting with serum eye drops
Number
One month after starting with serum eye drops

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Pieter F van der Meer, PhD, Senior Scientist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Autologous serum eye drops

3
Subscribe