Oral Sialic Acid Product Beauty Efficacy Test

June 8, 2026 updated by: Wuhan CASOV Green Biotech Co., Ltd

Assessment and Comparison on 3 Groups of 25 Human Beings of the Effect on the Cutaneous State, the Dermis Echogenicity, the Moisturizing Effect, the Depigmenting Effect, the Effect on the Biomechanical Properties and the Effect on Wrinkles, Color and Homogeneity and Pigmentary Spots of Cosmetic Product N°1 vs Cosmetic Product N°2 vs Placebo After Oral Intake in Conditions of Normal Use During 28, 56 and 84 Days: Self-assessment of the Cosmetic Qualities and Efficacy

Evaluate and compare the effects on female facial skin of oral placebo (Product A), N-acetylneuraminic acid (Product B), and ACAI-PLUS (Product C) after 28, 56, and 84 days under normal usage conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430071
        • COSderma China Laboratory (Wuhan, China)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Chinese Asian women aged 40-65, with facial skin issues such as pigmentation spots, lack of elasticity, and wrinkles

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Skin type origin: Asian in China
  • Age: from 40 to 65 years old
  • Gender: female
  • Specific criteria:

    • All skin type on the face Dry, dry combination, normal

    1. presenting with a lack of elasticity to the face, inclusion grade

      ≤ 6 according 10 points scale

    2. presenting with a lack of density to the face, inclusion grade ≤ 6 according 10 points scale
    3. presenting with wrinkles on crow's feet area, grade ≥ 2 according to Skin ageing atlas Vol.2 (p.41)
    4. presenting with pigmentary spots with at least one with diameter ≥ 3mm
  • Usual or occasional user of food supplements
  • Able to give her informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

The non-inclusion general criteria were the following ones:

  • allergies or reactivity to cosmetic products,
  • for the subjects undergoing hormonal treatment; change of treatment within 3 months preceding the inclusion visit,
  • expectation of change in the current hormonal treatment during the study,
  • anti-allergic, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, dermatological treatment or corticosteroid therapy within 2 weeks before the inclusion visit,
  • having a chronic pathology,
  • performing or prevision to perform another test during the study or during the exclusion period,
  • employee of the COSderma laboratory,
  • pregnant or breast-feeding woman,
  • woman not taking precaution to prevent pregnancy.

The non-inclusion specific criteria were the following ones:

  • application of care products to the face within 48 hours preceding the inclusion visit,
  • application of make-up products to the face the day of the inclusion visit,
  • face wash with any other means than clear water (no soap or cleanser) on the day of the inclusion visit,
  • application of self-tanning products to the face within 4 weeks preceding the inclusion visit,
  • Oral intake of food supplement within 1 month preceding the inclusion visit,
  • cutaneous marks on the face which could interfere with the skin's clinical signs assessment (pigmentation issues, scar tissues, over-developed hairiness, too many ephelides and naevi, sunburns...),
  • solar exposition (natural sun or UVA or heliotherapy treatment) within 4 weeks preceding the inclusion visit and expectation of solar exposition (natural or UVA) during the study,
  • Vitamin A acid treatment or its derivatives within 3 months preceding the pre-inclusion visit,
  • Retinoid based oral treatment within 6 months before the pre-inclusion visit, or local treatment within 2 months prior to this visit,
  • Carotene based treatment within 4 weeks preceding the inclusion visit,
  • expectation or having undergone aesthetic or dermatological surgery on the face.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group A
placebo
Oral placebo once daily for 84 consecutive days
Group B
N-acetylneuraminic acid
Oral N-acetylneuraminic acid, once daily, for 84 consecutive days
Group C
ACAI-PLUS
Oral ACAI-PLUS, once a day, for 84 consecutive days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin clinical scores
Time Frame: Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Dermatologists use a 10-point scale (0-9) and Volume 2 of the Atlas of Skin Aging for visual/tactile assessment. (includes elasticity, firmness, crow's feet, under-eye wrinkles, facial sagging, skin tone radiance, moisturization)
Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-assessment by subjects
Time Frame: Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Subjects self-rated using a 10-point scale (0-9). (includes skin beauty, visibility of wrinkles, skin tone evenness, radiance, firmness)
Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Dermal echo parameters
Time Frame: Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Using Dermcup® high-frequency B-mode ultrasound scanning (25 MHz probe) to obtain dermal echo parameters
Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Color and clarity of spots
Time Frame: Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Dermatologists use Pantone color cards to score the color and clarity of spots
Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Wrinkles, skin tone uniformity, and spots
Time Frame: Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
COSderma Photobench photography + Newtone software analysis to obtain information on wrinkles, skin tone uniformity, and spots
Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Stratum corneum moisture index
Time Frame: Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Corneometer® CM825 capacitance measurement method to obtain Stratum corneum moisture index
Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Biomechanical properties of the skin
Time Frame: Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
DTM310 Diastron® torque meter obtains information on skin biomechanical properties
Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Freckle removal effect
Time Frame: Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Siascope V® spectrophotometric intradermal analysis obtains information on freckle removal effects
Day0、Day28、Day56、Day84
Self-assessment of cosmetic quality and efficacy
Time Frame: Day28、Day56、Day84
By distributing 12 questionnaires to the subjects, self-assessment information on the quality and effectiveness of cosmetics was obtained. A four-point Likert scale was used (Agree, Somewhat Agree, Somewhat Disagree, Disagree), and the questionnaire content included: 1. Skin feels better; 2. Skin becomes fairer; 3. Pigmentation on the skin lightens or decreases; 4. Skin becomes radiant; 5. Skin becomes more elastic; 6. Skin is firmer than before; 7. Skin wrinkles and fine lines improve; 8. Skin becomes moisturized/hydrated; 9. Skin's oil-water balance is better; 10. Skin looks rejuvenated, full of energy; 11. Sleep improves after consumption; 12. Memory improves after consumption.
Day28、Day56、Day84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SECCR/2022-132-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Behavior

Clinical Trials on Oral placebo

Search Similar Trials