Transition From Sevoflurane to Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients (TSTP)

June 8, 2026 updated by: Manuel Cuevas, Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín

Observational Analysis of the Transition From Inhalational Anesthesia to Total Intravenous Anesthesia Guided by Bispectral Index and the Eleveld Model in Pediatric Patients

his prospective, observational, exploratory, and multicenter study aims to describe the evolution of propofol effect-site concentration administered via target-controlled infusion (TCI) based on the Eleveld model-with adjustments for opioid co-administration-guided by the bispectral index (BIS) during the transition from inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in pediatric patients.The study population will include 50 pediatric patients, aged 2 to 12 years, scheduled for elective low- or medium-complexity surgeries. Induction will be performed with sevoflurane, followed by intravenous access placement and transition to TIVA using propofol and remifentanil via TCI. As part of the neuromonitoring, the bispectral index, spectral edge frequency (SEF), and median frequency (MF) will be recorded. Additionally, hemodynamic parameters will be recorded on a minute-by-minute basis.The primary objective is to describe BIS-guided adjustments of propofol during the anesthetic transition. Secondary objectives include describing interindividual variability in propofol titration, time to reach a BIS of 40-60, burst suppression patterns, SEF, MF, drug consumption, hemodynamic stability, and clinical adverse events. Statistical analysis will be primarily descriptive, examining correlations between BIS, propofol, and the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Argentina
    • C.a.b.a.
      • C.a.b.a., C.a.b.a., Argentina, 1270
        • Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gonzalo Alberto Tejeda, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nicolas Alejandro Rizza, MD
      • C.a.b.a., C.a.b.a., Argentina, 1881
        • Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francisco Bornet, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric patients aged 2 to 12 years scheduled for elective low- or intermediate-risk surgery at Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín and Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Recruitment will aim for balanced representation across three age strata (2 to <4 years, 4 to <8 years, and 8 to 12 years), although age stratification is not an inclusion criterion. Patients will be enrolled by consecutive non-probability sampling over an estimated 4-month period, with a target sample size of 50 participants.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 2 to 12 years
  • Scheduled for elective low- or intermediate-risk surgery according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) surgical risk stratification (e.g., tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, postioplasty, orchidectomy, orchidopexy, inguinal herniorrhaphy)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I or II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of parents/legal guardians to sign informed consent, or refusal of the child to provide assent when applicable
  • Cardiovascular or neurological disease that may interfere with anesthesia or with the pharmacokinetic model
  • History of allergy or adverse reaction to inhalational or intravenous anesthetic agents used in the protocol
  • Airway malformations or conditions that complicate standard intubation or airway management
  • Psychological or neurological conditions requiring sedative or hypnotic premedication prior to the anesthetic procedure
  • Treatment with drugs that may alter the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the anesthetic agents
  • Difficult peripheral venous access

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Pediatric patients undergoing sevoflurane to TIVA transition
Pediatric patients aged 2-12 years scheduled for elective low or intermediate risk surgery, undergoing standard sevoflurane mask induction followed by transition to total intravenous anesthesia with propofol via target-controlled infusion (Eleveld model) and remifentanil, guided by Bispectral Index monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Temporal evolution of propofol effect-site concentration under Eleveld-model TCI during anesthetic transition
Time Frame: From start of propofol infusion (T0, when sevoflurane MAC = 1.0 for age), until sevoflurane MAC = 0, or a maximum of 15 minutes, whichever occurs first.
Pattern of propofol effect-site concentration (Ce) adjustments (mcg/mL) over time during the transition from sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia to TIVA. Propofol is administered via target-controlled infusion using the Eleveld pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model with adjustment for opioid co-administration. Ce values are titrated under BIS-guided monitoring to maintain BIS between 40 and 60, as a function of decreasing sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration.
From start of propofol infusion (T0, when sevoflurane MAC = 1.0 for age), until sevoflurane MAC = 0, or a maximum of 15 minutes, whichever occurs first.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interindividual variability in propofol titration
Time Frame: Throughout the transition period (up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion)
Distribution of propofol effect-site concentration values required to maintain target BIS, expressed as mean, SD, median, and IQR across patients.
Throughout the transition period (up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion)
Time to reach target BIS range (40-60)
Time Frame: Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion.
Time elapsed from start of propofol infusion until BIS first reaches 40-60 (minutes).
Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion.
Time outside target BIS range
Time Frame: Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion
Cumulative time with BIS <40 and BIS >60 during transition (minutes).
Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion
Duration of cortical suppression episodes
Time Frame: Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion
Total time with EEG suppression detected by BIS monitor (minutes).
Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion
Spectral edge frequency (SEF) and median frequency (MF) over time
Time Frame: Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion
Time course of SEF and MF (Hz) recorded minute by minute from processed EEG.
Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion
Incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion
Frequency of hypotension (≥20% drop in MAP from baseline), hypertension (≥20% rise in MAP from baseline), bradycardia (HR below age-adjusted normal range), and tachycardia (HR above age-adjusted normal range).
Up to 15 minutes from start of propofol infusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Medtronic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Manuel Cuevas, MD, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 26, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 28, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PED-TIVA-TRANS
  • TSTP01 (Other Identifier: Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

A formal individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan has not yet been established. The current informed consent and assent forms approved by the Ethics Committees do not specifically authorize sharing of individual-level data with third parties; only aggregated, anonymized results are planned for dissemination through scientific publications and conference presentations. A decision regarding IPD sharing may be reconsidered after study completion, subject to ethics committee approval, additional consent provisions if required, and a formal data sharing agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings