Flap Vs Flapless Technique for Delayed Implant Placement in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone

June 12, 2026 updated by: Mina raafat, Suez Canal University

Assessment of Flap Versus Flapless Technique for Delayed Implant Placement in The Maxillary Esthetic Zone

This randomized comparative clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and esthetic outcomes of flap versus flapless techniques for delayed dental implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Sixteen patients requiring implant placement in the maxillary anterior or premolar region will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group I will undergo implant placement using the conventional flap technique, while Group II will receive implant placement using the flapless technique. Clinical outcomes including postoperative pain, edema, surgical insertion time, and implant stability will be assessed. Radiographic evaluation will include peri-implant bone quantity, bone quality, and crestal bone loss. Follow-up examinations will be performed immediately after surgery and at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ismailia, Egypt
        • Suez Canal University, Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged from 30 to 50 years old.
  • Adults of both genders.
  • Patients who are free from any systemic disease (ASA I).
  • Patients with teeth loss at upper anterior and premolar regions more than 1-year.
  • Presence of sufficient apical and peripheral bone to achieve primary implant stability (minimum 3-5 mm of bone beyond the socket apex and overall socket length ≥ 10 mm).
  • Patients with bone quality classified as D3, as assessed by pre-operative CBCT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and lactating women.
  • Heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes/day)
  • Patients with bad oral habits such as bruxism.
  • Patients with poor oral hygiene.
  • Patients with gingival diseases.
  • Patients with periodontal diseases (with severe vertical or horizontal bone loss).
  • Teeth with periapical or lateral infection or lesions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Flap Technique
Delayed implant placement using a conventional full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap approach.
Implant placement following crestal incision and mucoperiosteal flap elevation to expose the alveolar ridge.
Experimental: Flapless Technique
Delayed implant placement using a flapless surgical approach.
Implant placement performed without flap elevation using a minimally invasive flapless approach.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)
Time Frame: Immediately after implant placement and 6 months postoperatively.
Implant stability measured using the Osstell resonance frequency analysis device.
Immediately after implant placement and 6 months postoperatively.
Marginal Crestal Bone Loss
Time Frame: Immediately postoperative, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Radiographic assessment of peri-implant crestal bone level changes using standardized digital periapical radiographs.
Immediately postoperative, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Relative bone density
Time Frame: Immediately postoperative, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Radiographic assessment of peri-implant bone density using standardized digital periapical radiographs.
Immediately postoperative, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: Postoperative days 1, 3, and 7.
Pain intensity measured using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Postoperative days 1, 3, and 7.
Postoperative Edema
Time Frame: Postoperative days 1,3 and 7.
Facial swelling assessed using 4-grade visual edema scale.
Postoperative days 1,3 and 7.
Surgical Insertion Time
Time Frame: During surgery.
Duration of implant placement surgery measured using a stopwatch.
During surgery.
Postoperative Comfort
Time Frame: 1 day postoperatively
Patient-reported postoperative comfort assessed using a validated 5-point Likert scale questionnaire.
1 day postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mohamed Said Hamed, Professor of Oral and Maxillof, Suez Canal University
  • Study Director: Ahmed Abdelmohsen Younis, Associate Professor of Oral an, Suez Canal University
  • Principal Investigator: Mina Raafat, B.S.D, Suez Canal University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 970/2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Partial Edentulism

Clinical Trials on Flap Implant Placement

Search Similar Trials