Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement

January 26, 2026 updated by: Misr International University

Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement in Mandibular Posterior Augmented Ridge. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Statement of problem: The stability of peri-implant bone is a crucial factor for the long-term success of dental implants, where crestal bone plays a significant role in both the primary as well as the long- term implant stability. A bone loss of 1.5 mm during the first year of loading has been acceptable according to the early standards. However, more bone stability can be expected with the development in implant designs and surfaces over the past decades.

Aim of the study: the aim of this study is to radiographically assess the crestal bone changes following delayed implant placement in mandibular previously augmented posterior sites, comparing cases with equicrestal implant placement with subcrestal implant placement

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Statement of problem: The stability of peri-implant bone is a crucial factor for the long-term success of dental implants, where crestal bone plays a significant role in both the primary as well as the long- term implant stability. A bone loss of 1.5 mm during the first year of loading has been acceptable according to the early standards. However, more bone stability can be expected with the development in implant designs and surfaces over the past decades.

Aim of the study: the aim of this study is to radiographically assess the crestal bone changes following delayed implant placement in mandibular previously augmented posterior sites, comparing cases with equicrestal implant placement with subcrestal implant placement.

Materials and methods: This prospective, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial will have 36 participants who need implant placement at the posterior mandibular area where they previously received horizontal bone augmentation. They will be randomly allocated into 2 groups, where group A (test) will receive dental implant placed subcrestally and group B (control) will receive implant placed equicrestally. Crestal bone loss will be assessed by periapical radiographs at implant placement (T0), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T6), 12 months (T12) and 18 months (T18) following implant placement. Keratinized tissue width, and soft tissue thickness will be measured clinically by periodontal probe at the same time points. Buccal bone changes will be evaluated at 18 months compared with the preoperative cone beam computed tomography by fusion module. Patient satisfaction will be recorded at the end of the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 21 years.
  • Patients having augmented (by 50/50 particulate xenograft and autogenous bone) edentulous posterior site with vertical bone height of > 10 mm in the mandible with a width of ridge ≥ 7 mm

    • Adequate Inter-arch space for implant placement
    • Favorable occlusion (no traumatic occlusion).
  • Good oral hygiene.•Accepts 18 months follow-up period (cooperative patient)
  • The patient provides informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with inadequate bone volume and/ or quality
  • Patients with remaining roots or with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest.
  • Patients having systemic conditions that interfere with normal wound healing
  • Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits .
  • Smoker patients.
  • Pregnant women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Subcrestal implant placement
Delayed implant placement 2 mm subcrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.
Delayed implant placement 2 mm subcrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.
Active Comparator: Crestal implant placement
Delayed implant placement equicrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.
Delayed implant placement equicrestally in missing mandibular posterior site.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Crestal bone changes
Time Frame: at baseline,3, 6 ,12 and 18 months
Periapical digital radiographs to determine the amount of crestal bone lose in mm
at baseline,3, 6 ,12 and 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Keratinized tissue width
Time Frame: at baseline, 3,6,12 and 18 months
Keratinized tissue width using periodontal probe in mm
at baseline, 3,6,12 and 18 months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: at baseline, 6 ,12 and 18 months
Questionnaire
at baseline, 6 ,12 and 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: hani el nahas professor, Professor, Misr International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Implant Therapy

Clinical Trials on Subcrestal implant placement

Subscribe