Simulation Training for Adolescent Leukemia Care in Nursing Students

June 16, 2026 updated by: Atılım University

The Effect of Scenario-Based Simulation Training for Adolescent Leukemia Care on Nursing Students' Perceived Stress, Knowledge, and Learning Satisfaction: A Mixed-Methods Study

This study aims to evaluate the effects of scenario-based simulation training for adolescent leukemia care on nursing students' perceived stress, knowledge level, and learning satisfaction. Nursing students often encounter challenges when managing complex clinical situations involving pediatric oncology patients. Simulation-based education may help students develop clinical skills and confidence in a safe learning environment.

The study investigates whether participation in an adolescent leukemia simulation scenario improves students' knowledge related to extravasation management, affects their perceived stress levels, and enhances their learning satisfaction. In addition, students' experiences and perceptions regarding the simulation training will be explored through qualitative interviews.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Simulation-based education is increasingly used in nursing programs to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. Pediatric oncology care requires specialized knowledge and clinical decision-making skills, particularly in managing complications such as chemotherapy extravasation. However, nursing students often have limited opportunities to encounter such situations during clinical placements.

This mixed-methods study will evaluate the effectiveness of an adolescent leukemia scenario-based simulation training program among third-year nursing students. The quantitative component will employ a single-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. Participants will complete baseline assessments before the simulation intervention and follow-up assessments immediately after the simulation and debriefing sessions.

The simulation scenario focuses on the recognition and management of chemotherapy extravasation in an adolescent patient with leukemia. The intervention will be conducted in a simulation laboratory using a structured process including prebriefing, simulation implementation, and debriefing based on the Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) framework.

Quantitative outcomes will include perceived stress, knowledge regarding extravasation management, and learning satisfaction. Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured focus group interviews conducted after the simulation experience. The qualitative findings will provide a deeper understanding of participants' experiences, perceptions, clinical reasoning processes, and learning outcomes.

Data will be analyzed using appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical methods for the quantitative component and thematic analysis for the qualitative component. Findings from both components will be integrated to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the educational effectiveness of adolescent leukemia scenario-based simulation training in undergraduate nursing education.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06830
        • Atılım University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Third-year nursing students enrolled at Atılım University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing
  • Voluntary participation in the study
  • Not having previously taken the NURS302 - Child Health and Diseases course

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Withdrawal from the study at any stage
  • Incomplete completion of data collection forms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Simulation Training Group
Third-year nursing students who received scenario-based simulation training on extravasation management in an adolescent leukemia patient, followed by structured debriefing using the PEARLS model.
A simulation-based educational intervention consisting of prebriefing (3 min), environmental orientation (3 min), scenario-based simulation on extravasation management in an adolescent leukemia patient (10 min), and structured debriefing using the PEARLS model (30 min). Pre- and post-tests were administered to assess perceived stress, knowledge level, and student satisfaction.
Other Names:
  • Simulation-Based Learning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extravasation Knowledge Level
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-simulation) and immediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation, approximately 1 hour later)
Change in nursing students' knowledge about extravasation management, assessed using a 10-item multiple-choice knowledge test developed by the researchers. Each correct answer scores 1 point (total: 0-10). Higher scores indicate better knowledge.
Baseline (pre-simulation) and immediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation, approximately 1 hour later)
Perceived Stress Level
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-simulation) and immediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation, approximately 1 hour later)
Change in perceived stress measured with the Nursing Student Perceived Stress Scale (NSPSS; Karaca et al., 2015), a 29-item, 5-point Likert scale with 6 subscales. Total scores range from 0 to 116; higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Baseline (pre-simulation) and immediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation, approximately 1 hour later)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning
Time Frame: Immediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation only, approximately 1 hour after baseline)
Student satisfaction assessed using the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (NLN; Turkish adaptation by Karaçay & Kaya, 2017), a 13-item, 5-point Likert scale with 2 subscales. Scores range from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction and self-confidence.
Immediately after simulation and debriefing (post-simulation only, approximately 1 hour after baseline)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Students' Simulation Experiences (Qualitative)
Time Frame: Immediately after debriefing session (approximately 1-1.5 hours after baseline)
Themes derived from semi-structured focus group interviews conducted after simulation, exploring students' experiences regarding stress, clinical decision-making, teamwork, and learning processes. Analyzed using thematic analysis with MAXQDA.
Immediately after debriefing session (approximately 1-1.5 hours after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Didem Yüksel, PhD, Atilim University School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 16, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 16, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-59394181-100-137320

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Scenario-Based Simulation Training

Search Similar Trials