Comparison of Peer-Led Simulation Facilitation Methods on Nursing Students

December 6, 2023 updated by: Demet İnangil, PhD, Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University

University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing

There are limited studies in the literature on the peer-led facilitator involved in each stage of the simulation in simulation-based experience in nursing education. The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of having a competent senior nursing undergraduate student with simulation knowledge and experience as a facilitator at every stage of the simulation, on the effectiveness of the simulation (Simulation Effectiveness Tool), and on the participants' satisfaction and self-confidence in learning.

Method: This research is a prospective, randomized, crossover-designed experimental type of research. Structured Student Information Form, Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool, Student Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale will be used to collect data. The population of the research consists of all students enrolled in the first year of the Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing at the University of Health Sciences. Since voluntary participation in the research is based, students who want to participate will constitute the sample. Students will be divided into two groups of eight and will undergo two simulations for two consecutive days. Students in the first arm completed the simulation under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the first day, and under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the second day; Students in the second arm will receive simulation training under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the first day, and under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the second day.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The instructor who facilitates the simulation training has a "Simulation Applications" certificate. The peer facilitator is a 4th-grade student who has received 2-day simulation training and has at least 3 simulation experiences.

Students will be divided into two groups of eight and will undergo two simulations for two consecutive days. Students in the first arm completed the simulation under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the first day, and under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the second day; Students in the second arm will receive simulation training under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the first day, and under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the second day.

In this study, data will be collected through a 3-stage application process.

  1. Information

    • Respiratory Activity and Diabetes Management topics, which are in the Health Assessment course curriculum, will be explained to first-year students in the spring semester of the 2023-2024 Academic Year at the Faculty of Nursing, where the study will be carried out, by the instructor in charge of the course on the days and hours specified in the course program.
    • At the end of the course, explain to the students the purpose of the study, the method, and that the data will be used only for scientific purposes.
    • Students who volunteer to participate in the study are explained to the students who volunteer to participate in the study, and their verbal and written consent is obtained by explaining the duration, flow, and expectations of the application.
    • Informing students by deciding on the application day and time
    • Providing orientation to students by giving them information about the simulation environment and management in the application laboratory on the application day.
  2. Simulation Training

    • Sharing the patient's information for which a scenario text was created for the students before the application.
    • Explaining what the goals are expected from students.
    • Carrying out both simulation applications on separate days and in a way that students in both groups stay in the simulation environment for the same amount of time.
  3. Analysis

    • Holding a peer evaluation meeting after the simulation, where the groups experience the simulation.
    • Discuss students' thoughts about the process (their practices, decisions, and outcomes) regarding their simulation experience.
    • Discussing expected and achieved goals.
    • Following the analysis meeting, the Structured Student Information and Evaluation Form, Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool, Student Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale are administered to the students.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being 18 years or older,
  • Having taken the Health Assessment course,
  • Experienced education with simulation for the first time,
  • Being willing and able to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete filling of Data Collection Forms,
  • Not attending the simulation training on the day and time.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: First Arm
Students in the first arm received simulation training under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the first day, and under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the second day.
Scenario-based simulation prepared for Respiratory Activity and Diabetes Management topics in the course curriculum
Experimental: Second Arm
Students in the second arm received simulation training under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the first day and under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the second day.
Scenario-based simulation prepared for Respiratory Activity and Diabetes Management topics in the course curriculum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Simulation Effectiveness
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 months
Output regarding students' perceptions of the effectiveness of learning in a simulation environment. It will be measured with the Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool. The measurement tool has 19 items and four subscales. Sub-dimensions of the measuring tool; These are prebriefing, learning, confidence and debriefing. The preliminary information sub-dimension consists of two items, the learning sub-dimension consists of six items, the trust sub-dimension consists of six items, and the analysis sub-dimension consists of five items.
Through study completion, an average of 1 months
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 months
Outcome regarding students' attitudes and beliefs about simulation. It will be measured by the Student Satisfaction and Learning Self-Confidence Scale. The scale, which is widely used to measure students' attitudes and beliefs about simulation, was published by the National League for Nurses (NLN) (Franklin, Burns and Lee 2014). It consists of two subscales: "satisfaction with learning" and "self-confidence" and a total of 13 items. In the satisfaction with learning sub-dimension; Five items measuring satisfaction with the teaching method, variety of learning materials, facilitation, motivation and overall suitability of the simulation are included in the self-confidence subscale; There are eight sub-items in content adequacy: self-confidence, content necessity, skill development, available resources and information on how to get help to solve clinical problems in the simulation.
Through study completion, an average of 1 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023/16-25

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nurse's Role

Clinical Trials on Scenario-based simulation

3
Subscribe