Age-Stratified Conditioning Regimen Efficacy for MDS Haplo-HSCT

September 14, 2026 updated by: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People's Hospital

Prospective Cohort Study of Age-Stratified Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimens in Adult Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Receiving Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

This study plan aims to enroll adult patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are scheduled to receive T-cell-replete haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. After obtaining written informed consent, participants will receive either reduced-toxicity Bu/Flu/Cy/ATG conditioning regimen (for patients aged ≥55 years) or standard myeloablative modified Bu/Cy+ATG conditioning regimen (for patients aged <55 years) followed by unified post-transplant immunosuppression and supportive care. The objective is to prospectively characterize the 1-year transplant-related mortality and comprehensively evaluate hematopoietic engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, infection, relapse, survival outcomes and conditioning-related organ toxicity among all enrolled patients undergoing haploidentical transplantation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing Lu Daopei Hematology Hospital, Hebei Yanda Lu Daopei Hospital, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had low- and intermediate-risk MDS without ISD nor URD receiving haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having ISD or URD; patients having high-risk MDS; patients with active infection; patients with poor compliance; patients with organ failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Age-Stratified Conditioning Regimen
MDS patients without identical sibling donor or unrelated donor would receive haplo-HSCT. Participants will receive either reduced-toxicity Bu/Flu/Cy/ATG conditioning regimen (for patients aged ≥55 years) or standard myeloablative modified Bu/Cy+ATG conditioning regimen (for patients aged <55 years) followed by unified post-transplant immunosuppression and supportive care.
Drug: RTC conditioning regimen and Modified Bu/Cy conditioning regimen
RTC preconditioning regimen consisted of cytarabine (2g/m2/day, days -10 to -9), busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day on days -8 to -6), cyclophosphamide (1.0 g/m2/day, days -5 to -4), fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day, days -6 to -2), semustine (250 mg/m2, day-3), and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin, 2.5 mg/kg/d, days -5 to -2; Sanofi, France). Bu/Cy preconditioning regimen consisted of tandard institutional myeloablative busulfan + cyclophosphamide + rabbit ATG regimen per department routine dosing guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
transplant-related mortality (TRM)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for an expected average of 1 years
Death without disease progression or relapse
Participants will be followed for an expected average of 1 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematopoietic engraftment
Time Frame: Day 30 and Day 90 post-transplantation
Neutrophil engraftment is defined as the first day of sustained absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥0.5×10⁹/L for 3 consecutive days; platelet engraftment is defined as the first day of sustained platelet count (PLT) ≥20×10⁹/L without transfusion support for 7 consecutive days. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at Day 30 and platelet engraftment at Day 90 will be calculated.
Day 30 and Day 90 post-transplantation
Cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)
Time Frame: Day 100 and 3 years after transplantation
Cumulative incidence of Grade II-IV and Grade III-IV acute GVHD at Day 100, as well as chronic GVHD and moderate-severe chronic GVHD within 3 years after transplantation, graded per Seattle criteria.
Day 100 and 3 years after transplantation
Cumulative incidence of CMV and EBV reactivation
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as any detectable CMV or EBV viral load elevation requiring clinical intervention within 1 year after transplantation.
1 year after transplantation
Cumulative incidence of hematologic relapse
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as bone marrow blast recurrence or extramedullary disease relapse within 1 year after transplantation.
1 year after transplantation
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as the time from transplantation until hematologic relapse or death from any cause.
1 year after transplantation
Overall survival（OS）
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as the time from treatment until death from any cause or the last follow-up.
1 year after transplantation
Conditioning-related organ toxicities
Time Frame: From conditioning start to Day 30 post-transplantation
Incidence of grade 1-4 cardiac, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal and oral mucosal toxicities from conditioning initiation to Day +30 post-transplantation, with separate analysis of Grade 3-4 severe organ injury, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), and conditioning-related death, graded per WHO organ toxicity scale.
From conditioning start to Day 30 post-transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University People's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University Institute of Hematology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RTC Haplo-MDS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings