Evaluating the YATAC Programme (YATAC)

July 9, 2026 updated by: University of Aarhus

The Young Adult Taking Action Program: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Cancer Rehabilitation for Young Adults

Young adults aged 18-39 years with cancer often experience physical, psychological, and social challenges that affect their participation in everyday life and their health-related quality of life. Existing cancer rehabilitation services are rarely tailored to the specific needs of this age group. The Young Adults Taking Action (YATAC) programme was developed together with young adults with cancer, healthcare professionals, and researchers to provide age-specific rehabilitation that supports young adults in managing cancer-related challenges and returning to everyday life.

The aim of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a larger trial of the YATAC programme in a municipal rehabilitation setting. The study will examine recruitment, retention, acceptability of randomization, data completeness, assessment burden, and adverse events. In addition, the study will provide preliminary estimates of the programme's effects on health-related quality of life and self-efficacy.

Fifty young adults aged 18-39 years who are undergoing or have completed curative-intent treatment will be recruited through municipal cancer rehabilitation services in Aarhus Municipality, Denmark. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the 16-week YATAC programme or usual cancer rehabilitation services. The YATAC programme includes an individual needs assessment and goal setting, followed by group-based and individual sessions addressing physical activity, fatigue, sleep and cognitive challenges, mental health, sexuality and relationships, family and friends, nutrition, and education or work. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 4, 6, and 12 months after enrolment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Details will be included a protocol paper which will be submitted to an open-access journal.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Marc Sampedro Pilegaard, PhD
  • Phone Number: 004520722972
  • Email: masamp@rm.dk

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Recruiting
        • Folkesundhed (Public Health), the Municipality of Aarhus
        • Contact:
          • Tenna Askjær, Physioterapist and MSc
          • Phone Number: 004541859049
          • Email: tea@aarhus.dk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18 and 39 years of age
  • Are currently undergoing or have completed curative-intent cancer treatment within the past five years
  • Can understand and communicate in Danish and provide informed consent independently
  • Have been referred to municipal cancer rehabilitation services in the Municipality of Aarhus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with cancer before the age of 18
  • Previously or currently receive rehabilitation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard rehabilitation
Behavioral: Standard rehabilitation
Participants assigned to the control group will receive the standard cancer rehabilitation programme offered through Folkesundhed Aarhus. This includes physical exercise.
Experimental: YATAC programme
Behavioral: YATAC programme

The YATAC 2.0 intervention will consist of a 16-week multidimensional rehabilitation programme including a mandatory needs assessment and goal-setting component, which will determine the primarily group-based components in which the young adults will participate. These components will include: 1) Physical activity, 2) Fatigue, sleep, and cognitive challenges, 3) Mental health, 4) Sexuality and relationships, 5) Family and friends, 6) Nutrition, and 7) Education and work.

Each participant will be assigned a designated contact person, either a nurse or physiotherapist, who will follow the young adult throughout the programme. The contact person will conduct the needs assessments and goal-setting consultations and contribute to selected group sessions. In addition, one of the contact persons will be present during group-based sessions alongside the primary facilitator to promote continuity, coordination, and a sense of safety throughout the rehabilitation trajectory.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Baseline
1) Recruitment rate: Number of participants included within the planned recruitment period (July 2026-June 2027). Data will be collected using screening and recruitment logs completed by a responsible contact professional from the Municipality of Aarhus.
Baseline
Acceptability of randomisation
Time Frame: Baseline
2) Acceptability of randomisation: Proportion of randomised participants who accept allocation and commence their assigned study arm. A contact professional from the Municipality of Aarhus will complete data recruitment and allocation records.
Baseline
Attrition rate
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after baseline
3) Attrition rate: Proportion of participants who withdraw during the intervention period. Data about attrition will be collected using withdrawal registrations and participant records.
Up to 12 months after baseline
Adverse events
Time Frame: Four months after baseline
4) Adverse events: Frequency, type, and severity of intervention-related adverse events. and serious adverse events. Participants will be asked to self-report intervention-related adverse events and serious adverse events.
Four months after baseline
Completeness of data
Time Frame: Four months after baseline
5) Completeness of data collection: Completion of primary patient-reported outcome at primary endpoint. Questionnaire completion logs will be used.
Four months after baseline
Assessment burden
Time Frame: * Baseline * Four months after baseline * Six months after baseline * 12 months after baseline
6) Assessment burden: Participant-reported burden and acceptability of assessments. Short evaluation survey completed after assessments using 5-point Likert.
* Baseline * Four months after baseline * Six months after baseline * 12 months after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: * Baseline * Four months after baseline * Six months after baseline * 12 months after baseline

Improvements of the YATAC programme will be evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific and internationally validated instrument consisting of 30 items across 15 domains, including five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single symptom items, and a global health status/quality of life scale. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale according to the EORTC scoring manual. Higher scores on functional and global health status scales indicate better functioning and HRQoL, whereas higher symptom scores indicate greater symptom burden.

The primary endpoint of the intervention will be global health status/quality of life four months after baseline.

The remaining outcomes from the EORTC QLQ-C30 include: physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning; fatigue; pain; dyspnoea; and insomnia.
* Baseline * Four months after baseline * Six months after baseline * 12 months after baseline
AYA-specific quality of life
Time Frame: * Baseline * Four months after baseline * Six months after baseline * 12 months after baseline

Improvements of the YATAC programme will also be evaluated using the AYA-specific quality of life questionnaire, which is a supplementary module in the EORTC QLQ-AYA30 developed for adolescents and young adults with cancer aged 14-39 years. The questionnaire includes five multi-item scales assessing: 1) Activity limitations, 2) Worry about cancer and the future, 3) Self-esteem, 4) Relationships, and 5) Positive changes. In addition, nine single items address domains such as work/education, romantic and sexual life, relocation, caregiving responsibilities, and diet restrictions. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores reflect greater symptom burden, except for positive changes, where higher scores indicate better functioning

The outcomes from EORTC QLQ-A include: Activity limitations, worry about cancer and the future, self-esteem, relationships, positive changes, and work/education, romantic and sexual life, relocation.
* Baseline * Four months after baseline * Six months after baseline * 12 months after baseline
Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: * Baseline * Four months after baseline * Six months after baseline * 12 months after baseline
Improvements of the YATAC programme will also be evaluated using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-item Scale (SES6G) consisting of six items rated on a 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("not at all confident") to 10 ("totally confident"). The mean score across items represents the overall self-efficacy score, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in managing health-related challenges.
* Baseline * Four months after baseline * Six months after baseline * 12 months after baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Embedded qualitative study
Time Frame: Up to four months baseline
An embedded qualitative study will be conducted alongside the pilot RCT to explore barriers and facilitators related to recruitment, participation, retention, and acceptability of participation in rehabilitation intervention trials among young adults with cancer.
Up to four months baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Aarhus

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Southern Denmark
Gødstrup Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marc Sampedro Pilegaard, PhD, Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gødstrup Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 3, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Young Adult Taking ACtion
  • R379-A22563 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Danish Cancer Society)
  • 23-20-0478 (Other Grant/Funding Number: The Aase and Ejnar Danielsen Foundation)
  • R95-A4572 (Other Grant/Funding Number: The Central Region of Denmark)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Details will be published in an open-access journal.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

A protocol paper will be submitted in August 2026.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open access.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings