"Debridement PhagE AnTibiotics for PJI" (DePHEAT-PJI)

July 6, 2026 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

A Randomized Feasibility Clinical Trial of Phage Therapy in Periprosthetic Joint Infections Treated With Debridement Antibiotic Implant Retention (DAIR) Procedure.

Total joint replacement (TJR) has revolutionized care provided for patients suffering from disabling joint pain. Unfortunately, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and the leading cause of failure after TJR. Current standard treatment for PJI requires multiple surgical revisions of the infected prosthesis in combination with a prolonged course of systemic antibiotic therapy. Debridement Antibiotic and Implant Retention (DAIR) procedure is one of the surgical options that is routinely used to manage PJI, due to its lower risk of morbidity and surgical cost. DAIR is often used for patients who present with an acute PJI or who cannot tolerate a complex implant revision. However, the overall success rate for DAIR is ranging between 60-70%. DAIR failures are often attributed to the residual infection and biofilm burden left behind on the retained implant surface, which cannot be targeted effectively with post-operative systemic antibiotics. Therefore, research has been ongoing to identify non-surgical multidrug resistance (MDR) treatment adjuncts that can synergize the therapeutic effects of antibiotics in PJI care.

Numerous preclinical bone and joint infection models have clearly demonstrated such therapeutic benefits using bacteriophages (phages). Phages target bacterial cells and breakdown biofilm that it forms on the implant surface. Each bacterial strain tends to have a particular phage that is susceptible to that bacterial strain. Due to this phage specificity and the fact that bacteria can still develop resistance against a single phage, the concept of using a phage cocktail (mixture of 2 or more phage candidates) has been the preferred treatment approach for applying phage therapy. Using a phage cocktail provides a broader spectrum of bacterial strain coverage and makes it harder for the bacteria to develop resistance. Published literature has considered phage therapy to be safe for direct administration at the infection site with minimal adverse events provided that the phage preparation administered meets Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP).

The DePHEAT PJI trail, is a prospective, single center, 1:1 non-blinded feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to assess the safety and the effectiveness of the experimental phage therapy cocktails for patients with hip or knee PJI caused by either Staphylococcus (S.) aureus or Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa and comparing it to standardized therapy.

The investigator hypothesizes that this pilot RCT will help evaluate the practicality and potential risks associated with adding phage therapy to the conventional standard of care treatment plan. This will initiate the development of a necessary infrastructure for future phage trials and programs that expand our understanding on the benefits of using phage therapy for acute PJI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Total joint replacement (TJR) has revolutionized care provided for patients suffering from disabling joint pain. Unfortunately, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and the leading cause of failure after TJR. While the current cost in Canada per hip or knee TJR averages $7k CAD, the cost to treat a PJI complication after a hip or knee TJR is five times that amount. In addition, data collected by national and international joint replacement registries demonstrate that the health and economic burden of PJI is a mounting crisis due to the exponential increase in demand for TJR. Current standard treatment for PJI requires multiple surgical revisions of the infected prosthesis in combination with a prolonged course of systemic antibiotic therapy. This standard treatment approach has a failure rate of 20-30%. Unfortunately, this treatment failure is often associated with high rates of psychological distress, limb amputations and death. Debridement Antibiotic and Implant Retention (DAIR) procedure is one of the surgical options that is routinely used to manage PJI, due to its lower risk of morbidity and surgical cost. DAIR is often used for patients who present with an acute PJI or who cannot tolerate a complex implant revision. However, the overall success rate for DAIR is at the lower end of the spectrum, ranging between 60-70%. DAIR failures are often attributed to the residual infection and biofilm burden left behind on the retained implant surface, which cannot be targeted effectively with post-operative systemic antibiotics. Therefore, research has been ongoing to identify non-surgical multidrug resistance (MDR) treatment adjuncts that can synergize the therapeutic effects of antibiotics in PJI care.

Numerous preclinical bone and joint infection models have clearly demonstrated such therapeutic benefits using bacteriophages (phages). Phages target bacterial cells and breakdown biofilm that it forms on the implant surface. Each bacterial strain tends to have a particular phage that is susceptible to that bacterial strain. Due to this phage specificity and the fact that bacteria can still develop resistance against a single phage, the concept of using a phage cocktail (mixture of 2 or more phage candidates) has been the preferred treatment approach for applying phage therapy. Using a phage cocktail provides a broader spectrum of bacterial strain coverage and makes it harder for the bacteria to develop resistance. Over the past decade, there has been a rise in international interest and effort to translate the antimicrobial therapeutic potential of phages towards this challenging group of patients suffering from bone and joint infections. Published literature has considered phage therapy to be safe for direct administration at the infection site with minimal adverse events provided that the phage preparation administered meets Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP).

The overarching purpose of this trial is to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of phage therapy in patients with hip or knee PJI. The investigators hypothesize that this pilot RCT will help evaluate the practicality and potential risks associated with adding phage therapy to the conventional standard of care treatment plan. This will initiate the development of a necessary infrastructure for future phage trials and programs that expand our understanding on the benefits of using phage therapy for acute PJI.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
      • Ottawa, Canada
        • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are 18 years or older
  • Patients have been diagnosed with bacterial PJI caused by a single organism (either S. aureus or P. aeruginosa) confirmed through synovial fluid cultures.
  • Patients are undergoing DAIR surgical procedure for hip or knee PJI
  • Patients are clinically stable and independently mobile
  • Patients are willing and able to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have cultured multiple bacteria, and it is difficult for physicians to determine which bacteria is causing the disease
  • Patients develop a life-threatening condition or a condition that leads to deterioration of the patient's medical condition and that is unrelated to the known PJI as cerebrovascular accident, angina, cancer.
  • Patient's clinical condition is no longer stable and deteriorating, for example, if the patient develops sepsis secondary to PJI prior to the commencement of the phage therapy.
  • Patients who have only been through a hemiarthroplasty or uni-compartmental arthroplasty with infected implant component
  • Patients receiving any immunomodulating or immunosuppressive therapy medications for malignancy or autoimmune disease (with exception to inflammatory arthritis), chronic glucocorticoid use (≥ 20mg of prednisolone daily for at least 1 month with another cause of immunosuppression), and history of solid organ and/or bone marrow transplantation.
  • Presence of concurrent active viral infection, or history of uncontrolled HIV (CD4 count <200 cells/uL).
  • Patient is pregnant or breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Standard of care (DAIR + Antibiotics)
Patients will receive the standard of care for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection which is DAIR ( Debridement Antibiotic and Implant Retention) and antibiotic according to the bacterial culture.
Experimental: Bacteriophage treatment + DAIR + Antibiotics
In addition to the standard of care procedure (DAIR and antibiotics), patients in the experimental arm will receive 3 doses of intra-articular phage therapy. The first dose will be given intra-operatively after the DAIR and then will be done at day 14 and day 21 postoperatively. The second and third intra-articular injections will be done under image guidance.
Biological: The investigational product specifically targeting P. aeruginosa (DP-QB-PSA-005) and that targeting S. aureus (DP-QB-STA-005), each formed of a mixture of 5 bacteriophages.
For participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive a total of 3 local administrations (intra-articular) of the appropriate phage cocktail to the infected joint. The first dose will be administered intraoperatively during the DAIR procedure after closing the joint capsule. The second dose will be administered on post-operative days (POD) 14 and the third dose will be administered POD 21. The second and third doses will be administered by interventional radiology using image guidance (fluoroscopy) as per standard drug administration.
Other Names:
  • Bacteriophage therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of treatment emergent adverse event
Time Frame: up to 12 months

focuses on documenting any adverse events (both transient and persistent) or reactions associated with phage therapy.

  • Monitoring for signs and symptoms of allergic reactions after each phage administration, which could be manifested as fever, rash, flushing, hypotension
  • Monitoring for any signs and symptoms of emerging new infections
  • Monitoring for emergence of resistance to phage therapy or to antibiotics
up to 12 months
Evaluation of the feasibility of the trial design
Time Frame: up to 3 months

To assess the practical aspect of administering phage therapy in a hospital setting. This trial will define the achievability of performing a future larger scale trial. This trial will be evaluating the following:

  • logistical challenges related to transportation, storage and handling of phage therapy
  • operational challenges including technical and time feasibility factors
  • patient recruitment and acceptance to participating in such a trial
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of clinical response effectiveness to phage therapy
Time Frame: up to 12 months

Clinical effectiveness would be assessed through

  • Functional and mobility assessments during the study period using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) and clinical examination of participants range of motion compared to the baseline.
  • The absence of the need for re-interventions and repetitive debridement
up to 12 months
Assessment of Microbiological effectiveness of phage therapy
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Microbiological effectiveness includes the absence of isolated bacterial culture after phage therapy treatment.
up to 12 months
Assessment of biochemical effectiveness of the phage therapy
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Monitoring of the serum inflammatory markers compared to the baseline
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Hesham Abdelbary, MD MSc FRCSC, The Ottawa Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DePHEAT PJI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Information about study participants will be kept confidential and managed according to the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996. All personal health information will be kept confidential, unless release is required by law. Representatives of government regulators such as Health Canada, representatives of The Ottawa Hospital Research Ethics Board (OHSN-REB) as well as the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute may review the original, relevant medical records under the supervision of the QI and the study team for monitoring and auditing purposes

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periprosthetic Infection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings