- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03435679
One-stage Versus Two-stage Revision of the Infected Knee Arthroplasty
One-stage Versus Two-stage Revision of the Infected Knee Arthroplasty. a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.
This study investigates functional outcome and safety after one-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty.
Half of participants are treated with a one-stage surgical procedure, while the other half is treated with a two-stage procedure.
The investigators hypothesize that the functional outcome and quality of life of the participants is superior after one-stage surgery compared to two-stage surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A two-stage approach is the standard surgical procedure in the treatment of the chronically infected knee arthroplasty, but promising results have been reported after a one-stage approach from single-centre studies.
The potential benefits for the patients treated with a one-stage approach are many as they only have to go through surgery and rehabilitation once with shorter total length of hospital stay. However, no randomized controlled trials comparing outcome after the procedures have been performed so far.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aalborg, Denmark
- Aalborg University Hospital
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Rigshospitalet
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Bispebjerg Hospital
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Gentofte Hospital
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Hvidovre Hospital
-
Horsens, Denmark
- Horsens Hospital
-
Næstved, Denmark
- Næstved Hospital
-
Odense, Denmark
- Odense Universitets Hospital
-
Vejle, Denmark
- Vejle Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical signs of periprosthetic knee infection
- > 6 weeks from previous knee arthoplasty procedure (primary or total revision procedure)
- Speak and understand Danish and have given informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Soft tissue problems requiring plastic surgery
- major bone loss requiring mega/tumor-prosthesis
- acute surgery due to sepsis
- malignant disease with less than 2 years life expectancy
- re-infection with previous two-stage procedure
- bilateral knee infection
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: one-stage
one-stage surgical treatment of the infected knee arthroplasty
|
one-stage surgery
|
|
Active Comparator: two-stage
two-stage surgical treatment of the infected knee arthroplasty with a interim period of 8-10 weeks between stages
|
two-stage surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oxford Knee Score (AUC)
Time Frame: preoperatively 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12 months postoperatively.
|
Area Under Curve for Oxford Knee Score
|
preoperatively 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12 months postoperatively.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oxford Knee Score (AUC)
Time Frame: preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
Area Under Curve for Oxford Knee Score
|
preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
Quality of life questionnaire
|
preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
Re-revision rate
Time Frame: 2 year postoperatively
|
re-revisions due to infection and other causes
|
2 year postoperatively
|
|
mortality
Time Frame: 90 days postoperatively and 1 and 2 year postoperatively
|
postoperative mortality
|
90 days postoperatively and 1 and 2 year postoperatively
|
|
readmission rate
Time Frame: 90 days postoperatively
|
postoperative readmission rate
|
90 days postoperatively
|
|
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively
|
Range of motion of the infected/operated knee
|
2 years postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Martin Lindberg-Larsen
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lindberg-Larsen M, Jorgensen CC, Bagger J, Schroder HM, Kehlet H. Revision of infected knee arthroplasties in Denmark. Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):333-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1148453. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
- Lindberg-Larsen M, Pitter FT, Voldstedlund M, Schroder HM, Bagger J. Microbiological diagnosis in revision of infected knee arthroplasties in Denmark. Infect Dis (Lond). 2017 Nov-Dec;49(11-12):824-830. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1350878. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
- Masters JP, Smith NA, Foguet P, Reed M, Parsons H, Sprowson AP. A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jul 29;14:222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-222.
- Haddad FS, Sukeik M, Alazzawi S. Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3721-8.
- Singer J, Merz A, Frommelt L, Fink B. High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1461-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2174-6. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
- Baker P, Petheram TG, Kurtz S, Konttinen YT, Gregg P, Deehan D. Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two-stage revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Dec;21(12):2713-20. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2090-7. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
- Massin P, Delory T, Lhotellier L, Pasquier G, Roche O, Cazenave A, Estellat C, Jenny JY. Infection recurrence factors in one- and two-stage total knee prosthesis exchanges. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3131-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3884-1. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
- Lindberg-Larsen M, Odgaard A, Fredborg C, Schroder HM; One-stage vs Two-stage Collaboration Group. One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 12;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04044-8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MLL_02_2018
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Periprosthetic Knee Infection
-
University Hospital, BonnRecruiting
-
University Hospital, BonnCompleted
-
Odense University HospitalActive, not recruitingPeriprosthetic Knee InfectionDenmark
-
University Hospital, GhentActive, not recruitingChronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection | Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection | Prosthetic Joint Failure of Unclear EtiologyBelgium
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityRecruiting
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityCompletedReinfection | Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) | Total Knee Arthroplasty | Revision | Aseptic LooseningChina
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Not yet recruitingPeriprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)United States
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingPeriprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)
-
University Hospital, BonnRecruiting
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteNot yet recruitingPeriprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint Implant Knee
Clinical Trials on one-stage
-
Sichuan Provincial People's HospitalNot yet recruitingMicrotia | Treatment Outcome | Outcome Assessment | Reconstruction | Surgery Related Complications Rate | RCTChina
-
Tze-Woei TanUniversity of Utah; Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation CenterTerminatedHemodialysis Access Failure | End Stage Renal Failure | Arterio-venous FistulaUnited States
-
Aarhus University HospitalDanish Cancer Society; The Korning foundation; Foundation of the Kjaersgaard... and other collaboratorsCompletedBreast Cancer | Mammaplasty | Breast Carcinoma in Situ | Acellular Dermis
-
Erzincan UniversityMode Medical Implant ManufacturerNot yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus | Dental Implant Surgical Techniques | Short Dental Implants
-
McMaster UniversityMcMaster Surgical AssociatesRecruitingCryptorchidismCanada
-
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation...Recruiting
-
NorthShore University HealthSystemTerminatedEsophageal CancerUnited States
-
University of AarhusCompletedInfection | Hip Joint ReplacementDenmark
-
Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine InstituteUniversity of Sao PauloCompletedDevelopmental Disabilities | Cleft Palate | Cleft Lip | Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate | Restricted Language Development
-
Gennaro SardellaUnknownNon ST Segment Elevation MI and Unstable AnginaItaly