Crisugabalin in NMOSD Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Exploratory Trial (TERMINATOR)

July 9, 2026 updated by: Tang-Du Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Crisugabalin in Treating Neuropathic Pain Related to Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Exploratory Trial

This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory investigation conducted in China.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Crisugabalin, a China-developed novel third-generation calcium channel modulator, for neuropathic pain in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive Crisugabalin or placebo for 2 weeks , followed by an 8-week open-label extension period .The main questions of this study aim to answer are:

Does Crisugabalin lower pain scores after 2 weeks and 10 weeks? What medical problems do participants have when taking crisugabalin? This trial is to compare Crisugabalin to a placebo for the first 2 weeks to see if it reduces pain.

Participants will:

Take Crisugabalin or a placebo twice daily for 2 weeks (double-blind) Then take Crisugabalin for 8 more weeks (open-label) Visit the clinic at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 Complete questionnaires about pain, sleep, spasms, anxiety, and depression Last updated on December 2, 2025

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Chaoyang
      • Beijing, Chaoyang, China
        • the First Hospital of Tsinghua University
        • Contact:
    • Chongqing Municipality
      • Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Inner Mongolia
      • Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
        • Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Jinlin
      • Changchun, Jinlin, China
        • The First Hospital of Jilin University
        • Contact:
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China
        • The First Hospital of China Medical University
        • Contact:
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
        • Tangdu Hospotal
        • Contact:
          • Jun Guo
          • Phone Number: 86-29-8477 8844
    • Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
      • Ürümqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
        • Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

**Inclusion Criteria:**

Subjects who meet all of the following criteria will be enrolled in this study:

  1. Able to understand and voluntarily sign the written informed consent form;
  2. Male or female aged between 18 years (inclusive) and 75 years;
  3. Diagnosed with aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) according to the International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND, 2015) criteria;
  4. Patients with comorbid neuropathic pain, DN4 ≥ 4; no change in medication dosage within the past month;
  5. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain score ≥ 4 at screening;
  6. First-time use of Crisugabalin Capsules.

**Exclusion Criteria:**

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will not be enrolled in this study:

  1. Presence of peripheral neuropathy or pain unrelated to NMOSD that, in the investigator's judgment, may confound the assessment;
  2. Known history of allergy to the investigational drug components, or to other drugs with similar chemical structures, or to any excipients;
  3. Prior use of pregabalin ≥ 300 mg/day, gabapentin ≥ 1200 mg/day, or mirogabalin ≥ 30 mg/day with lack of clinical efficacy as judged by the investigator;
  4. Severe liver or kidney function abnormalities, meeting any of the following clinical laboratory findings:

1) Liver function: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN); 2) Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (calculated using the simplified MDRD formula); 5. Women who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study period, or currently breastfeeding; subjects who are unwilling to use reliable contraceptive measures (including condoms, spermicides, intrauterine devices, etc.) from the time of signing the ICF until 28 days after the last dose of the investigational drug; 6. Current use of IL-6 receptor blockers (e.g., tocilizumab, satralizumab); 7. History of suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation; 8. Participation in any other clinical study within 30 days prior to screening; 9. The investigator determines that there are other situations in which participation in the study is inappropriate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Crisugabalin group
Si meining
Drug: Crisugabalin
Crisugabalin 20-40mg bid
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
Si meining
Drug: Placebo+Crisugabalin
Placebo+Crisugabalin
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment

Patients rate their average pain intensity over the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale (0-10), with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain.

  • Min / Max: 0 / 10
  • Severity relationship:** Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Pain levels are categorized as: Mild (1-3), Moderate (4-6), Severe (7-10)
Change from baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) response rate
Time Frame: Change from baseline between Crisugabalin and placebo during the 2-week and 10 -week treatment period.
Proportion of subjects with ≥30% and ≥50% reduction in NRS from baseline between Crisugabalin and placebo during the 2-week and 10 -week treatment period
Change from baseline between Crisugabalin and placebo during the 2-week and 10 -week treatment period.
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment

The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) comprises three main components for pain assessment:

  1. Pain Rating Index (PRI): This includes 11 sensory descriptors and 4 affective descriptors. Each item is rated on a 4-point intensity scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The PRI yields a total score ranging from 0 to 45 (sensory subscale: 0-33; affective subscale: 0-12).
  2. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): A 10-cm unmarked horizontal line anchored by 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Patients mark a cross on the line to indicate their average pain level over the past 24 hours. The score is determined by measuring the distance from the 0 end to the mark (in cm), or by reading directly from a scale on the reverse side.
  3. Present Pain Intensity (PPI): A 6-point scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 5 = excruciating pain. Patients select the level that best matches their subjective pain experience at the present moment.

Score Ranges:

PRI: 0 - 45 VAS: 0 - 10 PPI: 0 - 5
Change from baseline in the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation:Patients rate how much pain interfered with sleep over the past 24 hours on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = pain does not interfere with sleep and 10 = completely unable to sleep.
  • Min / Max:0 / 10
  • Severity relationship:** Higher scores indicate greater sleep disruption due to pain.
Change from baseline in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation: Two parts - spasm frequency (0-4, where higher = more frequent) and, if present, severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). If frequency = 0, severity is not assessed.
  • Min / Max:Frequency: 0-4; Severity (if spasms present): 1-3
  • Severity relationship: Higher frequency and severity scores indicate more problematic muscle spasms.
Change from baseline in the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation:A clinician-rated scale with 14 items, each scored 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. Total score reflects anxiety severity.
  • Min / Max: 0 / 56
  • Severity relationship: Higher total scores indicate more severe anxiety.
Change from baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation: Clinician-rated scale for depressive symptoms. Most items scored 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe. A few items use a 0-2 scale (0 = absent, 1 = mild-moderate, 2 = severe).
  • Min / Max:0 / 74 (approximate for 24 items)
  • Severity relationship: Higher total scores indicate more severe depression.
Change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score after 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Incidence of adverse reactions
Time Frame: Change from baseline during 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and the incidence of TEAEs during the study period for Crisugabalin and placebo.
Change from baseline during 2 and 10 weeks of treatment
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score after 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation: A 7-point scale assessing overall improvement since treatment began.
  • 1 = Very much improved
  • 2 = Much improved
  • 3 = Minimally improved
  • 4 = No change
  • 5 = Minimally worse
  • 6 = Much worse
  • 7 = Very much worse
  • Min / Max: 1 / 7
  • Severity relationship: Lower scores indicate greater improvement; higher scores indicate worsening.
Change from baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score after 10 weeks of treatment
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level（EQ-5D-5L） score
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level（EQ-5D-5L） score after 10 weeks of treatment
  • Interpretation: Measures health-related quality of life across 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each rated 1 = no problems to 5 = extreme problems. A VAS from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health) is also included.
  • Min / Max: Dimension scores: 1-5 per dimension; VAS: 0-100
  • Severity relationship:Higher dimension scores indicate worse function/more problems; higher VAS score indicates better overall health.
Change from baseline in the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level（EQ-5D-5L） score after 10 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tang-Du Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jun Guo, Tang-Du Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 202603-06

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings