Hotspot Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Traditional Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

July 17, 2026 updated by: Roswell Park Cancer Institute

(PRESTO) A Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Hotspots in Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This clinical trial compares stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) with hot spots to standard of care SBRT for the treatment of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. SBRT with hot spots intentionally makes sure the tumor gets a higher radiation dose during treatment. This potentially may result in better control of the tumor, but also more side effects. SBRT with or without hot spots may be more effective in treating patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, compared to standard of care SBRT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Evaluate the impact of incorporating high isodoses termed "hot spots" in radiation therapy planning on local control.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate the impact of "hot spots" in radiation therapy planning on progression-free survival (PFS).

II. Evaluate the impact of "hot spots" in radiation therapy planning on overall survival (OS).

III. Evaluate the impact of tumor size on local control and if hotspot grouping impacts local control in a size-dependent manner.

IV. To prospectively evaluate the PFS in early stage-non small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) patients undergoing SABR who are already taking a beta-blocker as well as a potential interaction between beta-blocker usage and the perceived stress scale.

V. Will evaluate for any potential interactions between quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer [EORTC QLQ-LC13]) and hotspot grouping.

VI. Evaluate the impact of "hot spots" in radiation therapy planning on toxicity by total number of grade 3+ adverse effects.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:

I. Change in immune cell marker levels at week 12 post-SBRT (± 1 week) versus baseline, such as mediators of tumor antigen presentation, costimulatory molecules, immune effector cell populations, including CD4+ and CD+8 T-cells, T regulatory cells (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+), natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs).

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive standard of care (SOC) SBRT for 1-5 fractions over 1-11 days, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan with or without positron emission tomography (PET) scan and blood sample collection throughout the study. Patients may undergo lymph node sampling throughout the study.

ARM II: Patients receive hot spot SBRT for 1-5 fractions over 1-11 days, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan with or without PET scan and blood sample collection throughout the study. Patients may undergo lymph node sampling throughout the study.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year and then every 3-6 months up to month 36.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Farrugia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 2
  • Diagnosed with T1-3N0 biopsy-proven NSCLC of the lung. Multiple primary lung tumors are allowed; however, each lesion requires histologic confirmation
  • Metachronous lung tumors as defined as a new lung lesion in the setting of a historically treated lung cancer are allowed under certain conditions. The previous lung cancer must have been treated greater than 6 months prior to protocol therapy and this cancer must be considered controlled
  • Eligible for SABR
  • Participants of child-bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraceptive methods (e.g., hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately
  • Participant must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of a prior lung cancer will be excluded only if the previous treatment is within 6 months of the protocol therapy
  • Mixed small cell and non-small cell lung cancer
  • History of allogeneic organ transplantation
  • History of primary immunodeficiency
  • Patients must not have undergone prior radiation to overlapping regions of the chest that, in the opinion of the treatment physician, will interfere with protocol treatment
  • Active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the last 2 years. Replacement therapy (e.g., thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency) is not considered a form of systemic treatment and is allowed
  • Known EGFR or ALK mutation
  • Past medical history of interstitial lung disease (ILD), drug-induced ILD, radiation pneumonitis which required steroid treatment, or any evidence of clinically active ILD
  • Pregnant or nursing female participant
  • Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Aim II (hot spot SBRT)
Patients receive hot spot SBRT for 1-5 fractions over 1-11 days, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan with or without PET scan and blood sample collection throughout the study. Patients may undergo lymph node sampling throughout the study.
Procedure: Biospecimen Collection
Undergo blood sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
  • Sample Collection
Other: Survey Administration
Ancillary studies
Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography
Undergo PET scan
Other Names:
  • Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography
  • PET
  • PET Scan
  • Positron Emission Tomography Scan
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • PT
  • Positron emission tomography (procedure)
Procedure: Computed Tomography
Undergo CT scan
Other Names:
  • CT
  • CAT
  • CAT Scan
  • Computed Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Tomography
  • CT Scan
  • tomography
  • Computerized axial tomography (procedure)
  • Computerized Tomography (CT) scan
  • Diagnostic CAT Scan
  • Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type
Procedure: Lymph Node Biopsy
Undergo lymph node sampling
Other Names:
  • Biopsy of Lymph Node
Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Receive SOC SBRT
Other Names:
  • SBRT
  • SABR
  • Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Receive hot spot SBRT
Other Names:
  • SBRT
  • SABR
  • Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Experimental: Arm I (SOC SBRT)
Patients receive SOC SBRT for 1-5 fractions over 1-11 days, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan with or without PET scan and blood sample collection throughout the study. Patients may undergo lymph node sampling throughout the study.
Procedure: Biospecimen Collection
Undergo blood sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
  • Sample Collection
Other: Survey Administration
Ancillary studies
Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography
Undergo PET scan
Other Names:
  • Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography
  • PET
  • PET Scan
  • Positron Emission Tomography Scan
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • PT
  • Positron emission tomography (procedure)
Procedure: Computed Tomography
Undergo CT scan
Other Names:
  • CT
  • CAT
  • CAT Scan
  • Computed Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Tomography
  • CT Scan
  • tomography
  • Computerized axial tomography (procedure)
  • Computerized Tomography (CT) scan
  • Diagnostic CAT Scan
  • Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type
Procedure: Lymph Node Biopsy
Undergo lymph node sampling
Other Names:
  • Biopsy of Lymph Node
Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Receive SOC SBRT
Other Names:
  • SBRT
  • SABR
  • Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Receive hot spot SBRT
Other Names:
  • SBRT
  • SABR
  • Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to progression (local control)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Defined as no failure within the radiotherapy planning target volume (PTV), based on the international consensus on assessing local failure after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) will be utilized. The 2-year local control rates will be summarized by treatment arms using 90% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals. The local control rates between arms will be compared using one-sided Cochrane-Mantel-Haenszel test (alpha=0.1), stratified by performance status, surgery candidacy, and beta-blocker usage.
Up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From the start of treatment to first documented disease progression, or death due to any cause, up to 3 years
Will be summarized by treatment arms using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator.
From the start of treatment to first documented disease progression, or death due to any cause, up to 3 years
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: From the start of treatment to patient death due to any cause, up to 3 years
Will be summarized by treatment arms using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator. One-sided log-rank test stratified by tumor size, performance status, and surgery candidacy will be used to compare the OS between treatment arms (alpha=0.1).
From the start of treatment to patient death due to any cause, up to 3 years
Time to progression (local control) in a size-dependent manner
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Defined as no failure within the radiotherapy PTV, based on the international consensus on assessing local failure after SBRT will be utilized.
Up to 3 years
PFS for patients who are already taking a beta blocker
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Perception of Stress using Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Will be measured by The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) which assesses the perception of stress. The scale is constituted by 10 items that are self-rated by the subject on a 0-4 Likert scale. The scale minimum total score is 0, the maximum is 40. Higher total scores indicate a worse outcome
Up to 3 years
Change in Quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Assessed via European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Lung Cancer.
Up to 3 years
Incidence of grade 3+ adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Toxicities and adverse events (as per Common Terminology for Adverse Events version 5.0) will be summarized by the treatment arms, type, incidence, severity, seriousness, and relatedness. The rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs will be summarized as proportions with 90% Clopper Pearson confidence intervals.
Up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Farrugia, Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 25, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • I-4050824 (Other Identifier: Roswell Park Cancer Institute)
  • NCI-2026-04889 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage II Lung Cancer AJCC v8

Clinical Trials on Biospecimen Collection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings