Influencing Next-Generation Oncologic Outcomes Through Rapid Integration of Functional Precision Medicine (NOORI): A Feasibility Study of SmartMatch in Rare Gynecologic Cancers

August 5, 2026 updated by: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
This study is being done to determine how easy it is to use standard of care (SOC) surgical resections or biopsy for SmartMatch analysis to determine treatment options in advanced gynecological malignancies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

OUTLINE: This is an observational study.

Patients undergo tissue sample collection obtained from standard of care surgical resection or biopsy for SmartMatch laboratory analysis and have their medical records reviewed on study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Kalyan Banda, MD
  • Phone Number: 206-606-2222
  • Email: bkalyan@uw.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Recruiting
        • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kalyan Banda, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with metastatic or unresectable rare gynecologic cancers who are undergoing SOC procedures that yield fresh tumor tissue suitable for SmartMatch functional precision medicine profiling

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Histologically confirmed rare gynecologic malignancy, including but not limited to those listed
  • Metastatic or unresectable disease, OR disease for which additional systemic therapy is indicated
  • Fresh tumor tissue available from a SOC surgical procedure or biopsy that in the judgment of the treating team will yield adequate viable tumor for SmartMatch analysis
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Adequate organ function to receive systemic therapy as determined by the treating oncologist (protocol does not specify thresholds because therapy is not mandated)
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign informed consent
  • Willingness to allow data abstraction from the electronic health record for study endpoints

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of tumor tissue suitable for SmartMatch analysis
  • Purely borderline tumors or benign ovarian/uterine neoplasms
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the treating oncologist or PI, would interfere with receiving systemic therapy
  • Inability to provide informed consent or comply with study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Observational - SmartMatch laboratory analysis
Patients undergo tissue sample collection obtained from standard of care surgical resection or biopsy for SmartMatch laboratory analysis and have their medical records reviewed on study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants for whom SmartMatch generates at least one actionable treatment recommendation that is presented at the PMTB within 4 weeks (≤ 28 days) of fresh tissue acquisition
Time Frame: From enrollment up to 36 months

An actionable recommendation is defined as:

  1. FDA-approved therapy for any indication or available clinical trial;
  2. Predicted to have activity by SmartMatch functional precision medicine (FPM) and/or genomics;
  3. Endorsed by PMTB as clinically reasonable.
From enrollment up to 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation Feasibility: Proportion of PMTB-recommended therapies successfully obtained
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Up to 36 months
Implementation Feasibility: Time from PMTB recommendation to first dose of matched therapy
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Up to 36 months
Implementation Feasibility: Time from live tissue collection to SmartMatch report
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Up to 36 months
Implementation Feasibility: Reasons for access failure/delay (insurance denial, clinical decline, etc.)
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Will document reasons for failure or delay (insurance denial, lack of trial access, toxicity concerns, clinical deterioration, patient preference)
Up to 36 months
Proportion of patients achieving growth modulation index (GMI) ≥ 1.3
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Up to 36 months
Proportion of patients achieving progression-free survival on matched therapy (PFSmatched)
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Up to 36 months
Proportion of patients achieving progression-free survival on the prior line of therapy (PFSpast)
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Up to 36 months
Proportion of patients achieving GMI = PFSmatched / PFSpast
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Up to 36 months
Proportion of patients who begin identified treatment pathways following Precision Medicine Tumor Board (PMTB) review
Time Frame: Up to 36 months

Proportion of patients falling into each pathway:

  • Genomic-matched therapy implemented
  • Functional/organoid-matched therapy implemented
  • Physician's choice therapy (no matched therapy recommended, not obtainable, or declined)
Up to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kalyan Banda, MD, Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RG1126428
  • NCI-2026-05123 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • FHIRB0021265 (Other Identifier: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings