Promoting Recovery by Overcoming Self-stigma in Mental Health Disorders With a Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy (NECT) Group Intervention

August 3, 2026 updated by: Louise Penzenstadler

Promoting Recovery by Overcoming Self-stigma in Mental Health Disorders With a Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy (NECT) Group Intervention - A Randomized Controlled Trial and Qualitative Study

This study will evaluate whether Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy (NECT) can promote recovery among adults living with severe mental health disorders, including substance use disorders. NECT is a structured group intervention that combines education about stigma, cognitive techniques to challenge internalized negative beliefs, and narrative exercises that help participants develop a broader identity beyond their diagnosis.

Approximately 106 adults receiving outpatient or day-hospital psychiatric care at Geneva University Hospitals will be randomly assigned to receive either usual care plus 12 weekly NECT sessions or usual care plus 12 comparison group sessions that do not specifically address self-stigma or recovery. The study will examine whether NECT improves recovery after the intervention and whether any benefits are maintained over time.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Self-stigma occurs when people internalize negative societal stereotypes about mental illness. It can contribute to shame, reduced self-esteem, hopelessness, social withdrawal, lower treatment engagement, and difficulties pursuing personal goals. Although recovery-oriented mental health care increasingly emphasizes empowerment, resilience, social inclusion, and quality of life, interventions specifically targeting self-stigma are not yet routinely available. This is particularly relevant for people with substance use disorders, who may experience strong moral judgment and stigmatizing attitudes.

Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy is a manualized, recovery-oriented group intervention developed to reduce self-stigma. The programme combines psychoeducation about stigma and common misconceptions, cognitive restructuring of negative beliefs about oneself, and narrative exercises in which participants reflect on and share personal experiences. Its purpose is to help participants develop a more integrated understanding of themselves that is not defined solely by mental illness. Previous studies have reported beneficial effects in people with psychotic disorders, but evidence remains limited for other psychiatric populations and for people with substance use disorders. The French-language programme has not yet been evaluated in routine clinical practice.

The study will use a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled design with an additional qualitative component. Approximately 106 adults with psychiatric disorders will be recruited from three specialized outpatient or day-hospital settings within the Department of Psychiatry at Geneva University Hospitals. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention or control condition. Randomization will be stratified by participating centre.

Participants assigned to the intervention condition will continue their usual psychiatric care and attend 12 weekly NECT group sessions. Participants assigned to the control condition will continue their usual care and attend 12 weekly group sessions that do not include specific psychotherapeutic or psychoeducational content addressing self-stigma or recovery. The comparison sessions may focus, for example, on participants' weekly activities.

NECT will be delivered in groups of approximately eight participants. Each 90-minute session will be facilitated by two trained co-facilitators, including a mental health professional and a peer practitioner. The programme includes an introductory session, psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, narrative enhancement, and a concluding session. Participants who miss a session may be offered an individual make-up session to review the content and reduce the risk of discontinuing the programme.

The main objective is to determine whether participation in NECT improves personal recovery compared with the control condition. The study will also examine whether any changes are maintained approximately six months after the intervention and whether NECT influences self-stigma, empowerment, quality of life, self-esteem, self-compassion, psychological flexibility, psychiatric symptoms, and substance use.

In addition to the quantitative evaluation, participants who receive NECT may take part in semi-structured interviews after the intervention. These interviews will explore how participants experienced the programme, what they found useful, and how changes in self-stigma may contribute to recovery. The qualitative findings will complement the quantitative results and help inform the possible future implementation of NECT in routine psychiatric and addiction services.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
106

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Canton of Geneva
      • Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 1205

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • DSM-5 psychiatric diagnosis within F10-F48, F60-F69, or F90, including substance use disorders
  • Receiving outpatient or day-hospital treatment
  • Diagnosed or in treatment for at least 12 months
  • Clinically stable for at least 3 months, with stable pharmacological treatment during this period
  • Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score below 6

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another program likely to affect social functioning or self-stigma, such as social cognitive remediation or social skills training
  • Acute psychiatric episode with a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score above 6
  • Medical emergency or immediate life-threatening situation at inclusion
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Comorbid intellectual disability
  • Receiving care under constraint or deprived of liberty by judicial order Insufficient ability to speak and read French

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: NECT
Treatment as usual plus 12 weekly 90-minute NECT group sessions combining psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, and narrative exercises to reduce self-stigma and support recovery.
Behavioral: Narrative Enhancement Cognitive Therapy
NECT is a manualized group intervention comprising 12 weekly 90-minute sessions delivered to groups of approximately eight participants. It combines psychoeducation about stigma and self-stigma, cognitive restructuring of internalized negative beliefs, and narrative exercises that help participants develop a more integrated identity beyond mental illness. Sessions are co-facilitated by a trained mental health professional and a peer practitioner. Individual make-up sessions may be offered for missed sessions.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Treatment as usual plus 12 weekly group sessions without specific psychotherapeutic or psychoeducational content targeting self-stigma or recovery
Behavioral: Control Group Sessions
Twelve weekly group sessions in which participants discuss topics such as their weekly activities, without specific psychotherapeutic or psychoeducational content targeting self-stigma or recovery. Treatment as usual continues throughout.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in personal recovery measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention, approximately 12 weeks.
Personal recovery will be assessed using the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS). The total score ranges up to 205, with higher scores indicating greater recovery. An increase of at least 14 points is considered clinically meaningful.
Baseline to post-intervention, approximately 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in personal recovery at follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Personal recovery measured with the Recovery Assessment Scale. The total score ranges up to 205, with higher scores indicating greater recovery. An increase of at least 14 points is considered clinically meaningful.
Baseline to approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Change in self-stigma
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Self-stigma measured with the 29-item Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale. Items are rated from 1 to 4 and combined into a mean total score ranging from 29 to 116. The stigma-resistance items are reverse-scored. Higher scores indicate greater internalized stigma and therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Change in empowerment
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Sense of empowerment measured with the 28-item Empowerment Scale. an overall mean score will be calculated, ranging from 28 to 112. Higher scores indicate greater perceived empowerment and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Subjective quality of life measured with the 26-item WHO Quality of Life-BREF. Scores will be calculated separately for the physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment domains and transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Change in self-compassion
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Self-compassion measured with the 26-item Self-Compassion Scale. The total score is ranging from 26 to 130. Higher scores indicate greater self-compassion and therefore a better outcome.
Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Change in psychological flexibility
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Psychological flexibility measured with the 10-item Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II. Items are rated from 1 to 7 and summed to produce a total score ranging from 10 to 70. Higher scores indicate greater psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance and therefore a worse outcome.
Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Change in psychiatric symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Psychiatric symptoms measured with the 23-item DSM-5 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure, Levels 1. It assesses 13 psychiatric symptom domains. Each item is rated from 0 to 4, and the highest item score within each domain is used as the domain score. Each domain score therefore ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate greater symptom frequency or severity and therefore a worse outcome. There is no single total score for this measure. The scores should be reported by domain.
Baseline, post-intervention, and approximately 6 months after the intervention.
Change in substance use
Time Frame: Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 12 weeks, and 6 months after the intervention.
Substance use will be assessed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Level 2-Substance Use. Each substance-specific item is rated from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no use and 4 indicates use nearly every day during the previous two weeks. Higher item scores indicate more frequent substance use and therefore a worse outcome. Individual substance items will be interpreted separately rather than as a single overall scale score.
Baseline, post-intervention at approximately 12 weeks, and 6 months after the intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Louise Penzenstadler

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • in preparation

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

A decision regarding the sharing of de-identified individual participant data has not yet been made. Data sharing will depend on applicable ethical and data-protection requirements, participant consent, and approval by the study investigators and relevant institutions.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings