Hippocampal Temporal Interference Stimulation for Memory and Dual-Task Postural Control in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

August 13, 2026 updated by: Jiaojiao Lü, PhD, Shanghai University of Sport

Effects and Underlying Mechanisms of Hippocampal-Targeted Temporal Interference Stimulation on Memory Function and Dual-Task Postural Control in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

This trial aims to investigate whether a single session of 40 Hz hippocampal temporal interference stimulation can improve memory function and dual-task postural control among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The primary research questions to be addressed are as follows:

  • Can 40 Hz hippocampal temporal interference stimulation boost memory test performance in older adults with MCI?
  • Can 40 Hz hippocampal temporal interference stimulation improve walking and balance ability under dual-task conditions in older adults with MCI? Researchers will compare active 40 Hz hippocampal temporal interference stimulation against sham stimulation to identify whether this intervention yields positive immediate effects on memory function and dual-task postural control.

Participants will be required to:

  • Attend three laboratory visits over approximately three weeks, and receive one session of active stimulation and one session of sham stimulation in random order, with an interval of at least seven days between the two stimulation visits;
  • Complete memory and motor function assessments before and after each stimulation session;
  • Undergo functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans to detect changes in brain activity.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jiaojiao Lü, PhD
  • Phone Number: +86 18516565889
  • Email: ljj27@163.com

Study Locations

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200438
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai University of Sport
        • Contact:
          • Ethics Committee of the Shanghai University of Sport
          • Phone Number: +86 21 65508179
          • Email: lunli@sus.edu.cn

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

  1. Aged 65 years or older;
  2. Presence of subjective memory complaints;
  3. Objective cognitive impairment: screened using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Bejingversion (MoCA-BJ). The MoCA-BJ total score is 30 points. For individuals with <12 years ofeducation, 1 point is added to the raw total score (corrected total score capped at 30 points); acorrected total score <26 points indicates risk of cognitive impairment;
  4. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5;
  5. Does not meet diagnostic criteria for dementia: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores>18 for illiterate individuals, 221 for those with primary school education, and >25 for those withjunior high school education or above;6. Retains independent activities of daily living (ADL) and is capable of cooperating with allassessments and interventions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TIs Arm
Participants receive a single 20-minute session of active 40 Hz temporal interference stimulation (TIS) targeting the left hippocampus. In this randomized crossover design, each participant also undergoes a sham session on a separate visit, with at least 7 days between sessions. Memory, dual-task postural control, and fMRI assessments are conducted before and after each session.
Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique. In this randomized crossover trial, each participant receives two sessions in random order: one active 40 Hz TIS session targeting the left hippocampus and one sham session, with at least 7 days between sessions. Each session lasts 20 minutes. Outcome measures include memory tests, dual-task postural control assessments, and fMRI scans, conducted before and immediately after each session.
Other Names:
  • TIs
Sham Comparator: sham group
Participants receive a single 20-minute session of sham TIS using identical electrode placement and setup, but without effective 40 Hz stimulation. In this randomized crossover design, each participant also undergoes an active TIS session on a separate visit, with at least 7 days between sessions. Memory, dual-task postural control, and fMRI assessments are conducted before and after each session.
Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique. In this randomized crossover trial, each participant receives two sessions in random order: one active 40 Hz TIS session targeting the left hippocampus and one sham session, with at least 7 days between sessions. Each session lasts 20 minutes. Outcome measures include memory tests, dual-task postural control assessments, and fMRI scans, conducted before and immediately after each session.
Other Names:
  • TIs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Pre-intervention in Object-Scene Associative Memory Retrieval Accuracy After Stimulation
Time Frame: Immediately before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period
Retrieval accuracy is assessed using a computerized object-scene associative memory task programmed in E-Prime 3.0. Accuracy is calculated as the number of correct match/non-match responses divided by the total number of valid retrieval trials and multiplied by 100. The reported outcome is the post-intervention value minus the pre-intervention value within each stimulation period. Higher percentages indicate better associative memory retrieval performance.
Immediately before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period
Change From Pre-intervention in Object-Scene Associative Memory Retrieval Reaction Time After Stimulation
Time Frame: Immediately before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period
Reaction time is recorded by E-Prime 3.0 during the retrieval phase of the computerized object-scene associative memory task. The measure is the mean reaction time across valid trials with correct responses. Trials with no response, reaction times shorter than 300 milliseconds, or reaction times more than 3 standard deviations above the participant-specific mean are excluded according to the prespecified data-cleaning procedure. The reported outcome is the post-intervention value minus the pre-intervention value within each stimulation period. Shorter reaction times indicate greater retrieval efficiency.
Immediately before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Pre-intervention in Left Hippocampal Task-Evoked BOLD Signal During Associative Memory Retrieval
Time Frame: Before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period, with post-intervention scanning initiated immediately after stimulation
Task-state functional magnetic resonance imaging is acquired while participants perform the object-scene associative memory task. The measure is the mean blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) percent signal change within a prespecified anatomically defined left hippocampal region of interest during correct associative memory retrieval relative to the task control condition. The reported outcome is the post-intervention value minus the pre-intervention value within each stimulation period. Positive values indicate increased retrieval-related activation of the left hippocampus.
Before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period, with post-intervention scanning initiated immediately after stimulation
Change From Pre-intervention in Dual-Task Cost of 3-Meter Timed Up and Go Completion Time After Stimulation
Time Frame: Immediately before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period
Participants perform the 3-meter Timed Up and Go test under single-task and dual-task conditions. During the dual-task condition, participants complete the test while continuously subtracting 3 from a randomly selected three-digit number. Total completion time is measured in seconds using the Mobility Lab wearable motion analysis system. Each condition is tested three times, and the mean completion time is used. Dual-task cost is calculated as: [(dual-task completion time - single-task completion time) / single-task completion time] × 100%. The reported outcome is the post-intervention value minus the pre-intervention value within each stimulation period. A higher dual-task cost indicates greater deterioration in mobility performance under cognitive load.
Immediately before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period
Change From Pre-intervention in Dual-Task Cost of 7-Meter Walking Speed After Stimulation
Time Frame: Immediately before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period
Participants complete the 7-meter walking test at their usual comfortable speed under single-task and dual-task conditions. During the dual-task condition, participants walk while continuously subtracting 3 from a randomly selected three-digit number. Walking speed is measured in meters per second using the Mobility Lab wearable motion analysis system. Each condition is tested three times, and the mean walking speed is used. Dual-task cost is calculated as: [(single-task walking speed - dual-task walking speed) / single-task walking speed] × 100%. The reported outcome is the post-intervention value minus the pre-intervention value within each stimulation period. A higher dual-task cost indicates a greater reduction in walking speed under cognitive load.
Immediately before and after each 20-minute stimulation session during each crossover period
Number of Participants With Any Stimulation-Associated Adverse Symptom
Time Frame: During and immediately after each 20-minute stimulation session in each crossover period
Safety is assessed using a standardized adverse-reaction questionnaire completed immediately after each stimulation session. Prespecified symptoms include tingling, itching, burning sensation, pain, skin redness, fatigue, visual sensations, difficulty concentrating, and mood changes. Each symptom is rated as none, mild, moderate, or severe, corresponding to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Other spontaneously reported symptoms are also recorded. For each stimulation condition, a participant is counted as having an adverse symptom if at least one prespecified or spontaneously reported symptom is present with a severity score of 1 or higher during or immediately after stimulation.
During and immediately after each 20-minute stimulation session in each crossover period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ID: 102772026RT090

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.