Neuromodulation During the Prodrome to Prevent Disabling Migraine Attacks in Youth

August 15, 2026 updated by: Serena Orr, MD, MSc, FRCPC, University of Calgary

Neuromodulation During the Prodrome to Prevent Disabling Migraine Attacks in Children and Adolescents - a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background & Rationale:

One in ten Canadian youth have migraine, a disabling neurological disease that is more common in females and characterized by moderate-severe disabling headaches. Migraine attacks occur in a cycle that begins with a prodromal phase, followed by aura, a pain phase (headache), and finally a postdrome phase when the pain is resolved but other symptoms persist. The prodrome is recognized by ~90% of all youth with migraine, occurs up to 24 hours before headache onset, and consists of a variety of symptoms including, but not limited to, food cravings, fatigue, yawning, mood changes, and sensory hypersensitivity (e.g., light sensitivity). Prodromal symptoms are disabling and frequently graded as moderate to severe. All acute migraine treatments for youth have been studied for use in the pain phase, with the greatest treatment success early in this phase. Unfortunately, only ~1/3 of youth achieve pain freedom within two hours. Recently, a groundbreaking trial found that treatment during the prodrome could prevent the pain phase, although prodromal treatment does not exist for youth.

In considering the most innovative, safe, and patient-centered prodromal intervention, remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is the obvious choice. The investigator's engagement with 175 youth with migraine and their caregivers shows that REN is preferred when pill-based interventions are ineffective or impractical. REN has none of the limitations of pill-based prodromal treatment. The REN device is wearable, battery-operated, worn on the upper arm, and controlled wirelessly by a smartphone application. REN electrically stimulates sensory nerves in the arm below their perceived pain thresholds, but above their depolarization thresholds, to induce a conditioned pain modulation response in the brain to modulate incoming migraine pain signals.

Clinical trial and observational studies in youth with migraine have shown REN's safety and efficacy for home-based treatment during the pain phase and led the FDA to clear its use in youth >8 years. In the adolescent trial, 71% of participants had pain relief at two hours, there were no serious adverse events (AE), and only one device-related AE (transient arm pain) occurred. Also, emerging data show that adults with migraine in the prodrome phase display pain facilitation due to a deficit in pain modulation. Thus, REN's mechanism of action is likely to be more effective during the prodrome vs. the pain phase as it can "turn on" deficient pain modulatory areas earlier when they are most impaired.

Research Question & Objectives:

The investigators aim to determine the feasibility of implementing REN treatment during the prodrome to prevent migraine pain in youth with migraine, and hypothesize that:

  1. trial design will be feasible
  2. REN will be feasible for prodromal treatment, with >80% of participants using their assigned device to treat a qualifying prodrome.

The following feasibility and acceptability outcomes will be measured:

  1. proportion of eligible youth that are enrolled into the screening period, subsequently randomized, and treat a qualifying prodrome with REN.
  2. recruitment rate, retention, and withdrawals.
  3. participant feedback.

All secondary outcomes will be reported descriptively, and adverse events will be recorded and reported.

Methods:

This study will be a pilot randomized, single centre, double-blind, parallel group, sham-controlled trial comparing active to sham REN for the prevention of headache within 24 hours of treating prodromal symptoms in youth with migraine. Participants will be recruited from headache and neurology clinics at the Alberta Children's Hospital.

Eligible and consenting participants will complete an intake visit and enter a 60-day screening period where they will complete electronic daily diaries to determine prodrome or headache occurrence and features. Participants with 3-28 qualifying prodromes during screening, where >75% are followed by a headache within 6 hours, will be randomized 1:1 to treat one qualifying prodrome with active or sham REN over a 60-day treatment period. Participants will be trained on device use and will be instructed to not use any co-interventions during the qualifying prodrome; if headache onsets after the prodrome, participants will be instructed to use their typical acute treatment. During the treated prodrome, a survey will determine the presence, type, and number of prodromal symptoms. Surveys at 2, 24, and 48 hours post-treatment will record the presence or absence of headache, its characteristics, and AEs.

The randomization sequence will be prepared by a biostatistician and will follow randomly ordered blocks of four and six, with variable block sizes. Only research pharmacists will have access to this sequence to prepare consecutively numbered blinded and matched study kits. These kits will contain a restricted mobile phone with only the REN software application pre-installed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • youth aged 8-<18 years with a diagnosis of migraine using gold standard International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria
  • self-reporting 2-14 headache days/month in the last 3 months
  • reporting prodromal symptoms that predict a headache within six hours >75% of the time.

To proceed past the 60-day screening period to randomization, participants will need to report 3-28 qualifying prodrome events with >75% of these events followed by a headache within 6 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the inability to read or understand English
  • a diagnosis of psychosis, schizophrenia, or moderate-severe autism, moderate-severe developmental delay or moderate-severe intellectual disability
  • implanted electrical device
  • uncontrolled epilepsy (i.e., >2 seizures in the past year)
  • abnormal skin on both upper arms
  • arm circumference <20 cm
  • severe cardiac or cerebrovascular disease
  • prior participation in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Active REN
45 minutes of a modulated symmetrical biphasic square electrical pulse, modulated frequency of 100-120 Hz, pulse width of 400 µs, maximum of 40 mA, which modulates the pain response in the brain using conditioned pain modulation to trigger an analgesic effect.
Device: Active Remote Electrical Neuromodulation

The REN device modulates the pain response in the brain using conditioned pain modulation to trigger an analgesic effect. This mechanism is achieved by electrically stimulating the C and Aδ nociceptive sensory nerves in the upper arm, just below the perceived pain threshold and above the depolarization threshold. Precise activation of these sensory nerves further triggers ascending pain pathways within the spinothalamic tract and brain stem. These pathways further activate descending pain inhibitory pathways within the brain stem to modulate incoming pain signals and produce an analgesic effect.

The active REN device involves 45 minutes of a modulated symmetrical biphasic square electrical pulse, modulated frequency of 100-120 Hz, pulse width of 400 µs, maximum of 40 mA, which modulates the pain response in the brain using conditioned pain modulation to trigger an analgesic effect.

Other Names:
  • REN
Sham Comparator: Sham REN
45 minutes of modulated symmetrical biphasic square electrical pulse, modulated frequency of ~0.083 Hz and a modulated pulse width of 40-550 µs. The sham device produces sensations comparable to the active device, appears identical to the active device, is also controlled wirelessly by a smartphone application, but uses lower stimulation parameters which were ineffective in adult trials.
Device: Sham Remote Electrical Neuromodulation
The sham REN device produces sensations comparable to the active REN device, appears identical to the active REN device, is also controlled wirelessly by a smartphone application, but uses lower stimulation parameters which were ineffective in adult trials. The sham REN device involves 45 minutes of modulated symmetrical biphasic square electrical pulse, modulated frequency of ~0.083 Hz and a modulated pulse width of 40-550 µs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - Proportion of Youth Enrolled Into Study
Time Frame: From enrollment to completion of the feedback form (between 60 and 120 days later).
Proportion of eligible youth enrolled into screening period (target=50%).
From enrollment to completion of the feedback form (between 60 and 120 days later).
Feasibility - Proportion of Participants Randomized to Study Treatment
Time Frame: From enrollment to completion of the feedback form (between 60 and 120 days later).
Proportion of youth enrolled into screening period subsequently randomized (target=33%).
From enrollment to completion of the feedback form (between 60 and 120 days later).
Feasibility - Proportion of Participants Using REN Treatment
Time Frame: From enrollment to completion of the feedback form (between 60 and 120 days later).
Proportion of randomized youth treating a qualifying prodrome event (target=80%).
From enrollment to completion of the feedback form (between 60 and 120 days later).
Study Acceptability Based on Participant Feedback
Time Frame: 60 to 120 days after successful enrollment.
Participant feedback will be assessed based on the completion of multiple choice and free text items in a feedback form. Multiple choice responses will be "Strongly Disagree", "Disagree", "Neutral", "Agree", and "Strongly Agree", with "Agree" and "Strongly Agree" suggesting the study is acceptable to participants. Multiple choices items will be from previously published work (PubMed ID: 27390769). Free text responses will be reviewed to determine overall positive or acceptable aspects of the study and negative or not acceptable aspects of the study.
60 to 120 days after successful enrollment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect Size Estimate
Time Frame: From enrollment to completion of the feedback form (between 60 and 120 days later).
The main outcome that we will obtain an effect size estimate for will be the proportion of participants with absence of moderate-severe headache within 24 hours of prodromal treatment. All secondary outcomes will be reported descriptively, with a focus on describing the prevalence and consistency of prodromal symptoms as reported for the adult trial. For headache, pain severity will be measured using the 11-point pain numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = the most intense pain imaginable (where a higher rating equals worse pain and worse outcomes). To align with International Headache Society and FDA guidelines for migraine trials, we will also use the 4-point pain severity scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe; higher ratings equal worse severity and outcomes), and participants will be asked about their most bothersome migraine associated symptom, and whether it is present or not.
From enrollment to completion of the feedback form (between 60 and 120 days later).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Calgary

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Serena L Orr, University Of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 31, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REB26-1157

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only aggregate data will be reported and there are currently no plans to share the individual participant data outside of the research team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings