Study Evaluating the Predictive Value of the Terminal Latency Index (TLI) for Treatment Response in Patients With Anti-MAG Neuropathy (PREDIMAG)

August 26, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

A Monocentric Retrospective Study Evaluating the Predictive Value of the Terminal Latency Index (TLI) for Treatment Response in Patients With Anti-MAG Neuropathy

"Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy is a rare dysimmune peripheral neuropathy, most commonly associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy. Its course is generally slow but may lead to significant functional disability. Despite therapeutic advances, including rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), immunochemotherapy, and more recently Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), treatment response remains highly variable between patients. The Terminal Latency Index (TLI), an electrophysiological parameter reflecting distal demyelination, is a recognized diagnostic marker of anti-MAG neuropathy. However, its potential role as a predictive biomarker of treatment response remains insufficiently studied. Identifying a simple, reproducible, and readily available biomarker that could predict treatment response would be of major clinical importance for personalized patient management and optimization of therapeutic strategies. This monocentric retrospective study will analyze clinical, biological, and electrophysiological data from patients with anti-MAG neuropathy followed at Nice University Hospital (CHU de Nice) to assess the predictive value of baseline TLI for clinical response 12 months after treatment initiation."

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
    • Alpes Maritimes
      • Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France, 06000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

"Adult patients with documented anti-MAG activity-associated neuropathy, followed at the Reference Center for Rare Diseases of the Peripheral Nervous System at Nice University Hospital (CHU de Nice) between January 2005 and July 2025. Planned number of participants: 100 patients."

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented anti-MAG IgM polyneuropathy: positive anti-MAG antibodies, associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and a compatible clinical phenotype.
  • Complete and interpretable baseline ENMG assessment: an initial electroneuromyography (ENMG) examination allowing reliable calculation of the TLI in at least two motor nerves among the right median, ulnar, and common fibular nerves.
  • The examination must include the distal motor latency, proximal motor conduction velocity, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP).
  • Treatment with at least one established therapeutic strategy: treatment initiated at the center, including intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), rituximab, immunochemotherapy, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), and/or symptomatic treatment.
  • Available functional clinical assessment: a documented INCAT disability score at two predefined time points: baseline (before treatment initiation) and 12 months (±2 months) after treatment initiation.
  • Consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral neuropathy associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy, with strictly negative anti-MAG antibody testing or no available anti-MAG antibody measurement.
  • Incomplete or uninterpretable ENMG data preventing accurate calculation of the TLI for the nerves of interest (median and ulnar nerves).
  • Absence of a formally documented INCAT score at baseline or within the 12-month assessment window.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy
This monocentric retrospective observational study will include 100 patients with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy followed at Nice University Hospital (CHU de Nice). No additional intervention or modification of routine clinical care will be performed. Clinical, biological, therapeutic, and electrophysiological data will be retrospectively collected from medical records and available archives. Routinely performed electroneuromyography (ENMG) data will be analyzed, with particular emphasis on the Terminal Latency Index (TLI), calculated from available electrophysiological parameters according to the standard formula. The predictive value of baseline TLI for clinical response to treatment at 12 months will be assessed. Treatments received as part of routine care, including rituximab, IVIg, immunochemotherapy, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), will be recorded. No treatment will be assigned or modified by the study. Data will be pseudonymized and ent
Diagnostic test: Electroneuromyography (ENMG) and Terminal Latency Index (TLI) Assessment
This monocentric retrospective observational study will include 100 patients with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy followed at Nice University Hospital (CHU de Nice). No additional intervention or modification of routine clinical care will be performed. Clinical, biological, therapeutic, and electrophysiological data will be retrospectively collected from medical records and available archives. Routinely performed electroneuromyography (ENMG) data will be analyzed, with particular emphasis on the Terminal Latency Index (TLI), calculated from available electrophysiological parameters according to the standard formula. The predictive value of baseline TLI for clinical response to treatment at 12 months will be assessed. Treatments received as part of routine care, including rituximab, IVIg, immunochemotherapy, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), will be recorded. No treatment will be assigned or modified by the study. Data will be pseudonymized and ente

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Favorable Clinical Response at 12 Months (≥1-Point Decrease in INCAT Score)
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment initiation
Clinical response at 12 months, defined as a reduction of at least 1 point in the INCAT disability score from baseline. This outcome will be used to assess the predictive value of the baseline Terminal Latency Index (TLI) for treatment response in patients with anti-MAG neuropathy.
12 months after treatment initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive performance of TLI according to treatment strategy
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment initiation.
Assessment of the predictive performance of baseline TLI for clinical response at 12 months, stratified according to the treatment strategy received.
12 months after treatment initiation.
Correlation between TLI, anti-MAG antibody titer, and INCAT score evolution
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months after treatment initiation
Assessment of the association between baseline TLI, quantitative anti-MAG antibody titer, and change in the INCAT disability score from baseline to 12 months.
Baseline to 12 months after treatment initiation
Optimal TLI threshold for predicting treatment response
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months after treatment initiation
Determination of the optimal baseline TLI threshold for predicting clinical response at 12 months using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Youden index
Baseline to 12 months after treatment initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mecheli Cavalli

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 31, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 26Neuro05

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings