Learning to THRIVE (L2T) Program Pilot (L2T)

August 27, 2026 updated by: Elizabeth Moore, University of Indianapolis
This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and potential effects of Learning to THRIVE (L2T), a six-week online educational self-management program for adults who self-identified as women or female and had interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). L2T combined self-paced online educational materials with a weekly live virtual group session. The primary feasibility objectives were recruitment, engagement, and retention. Exploratory outcomes included IC/BPS symptom and problem severity, pain intensity, pain-related interference and distress, and self-efficacy for chronic disease management. Qualitative data were collected to understand participants' experiences with the program.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

L2T used a flipped-classroom format over six weeks. Participants reviewed asynchronous e-learning materials each week and then attended a 60-90 minute live virtual group session facilitated by the research team to discuss and apply the lesson content. The program was informed by the THRIVE model, chronic pain science, adult learning, and instructional design principles. Quantitative assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 6 weeks after the intervention. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended survey questions, weekly lesson feedback, recordings of synchronous sessions, and post-intervention semi-structured interviews. This ClinicalTrials.gov record was entered retrospectively after study completion and was reconstructed from contemporaneous IRB-approved study materials.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46227
        • University of Indianapolis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identifies as a woman or female
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Self-reported healthcare provider-confirmed diagnosis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS)
  • Pelvic pain, pressure, or discomfort for at least 6 months, of at least moderate severity (greater than 3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale), causing weekly life interference and limiting life or work-related activities, general activity level, and/or enjoyment of life during the prior 3 months
  • Reliable access to a computer and Internet connection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to speak/read English
  • Neurological condition (for example, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, paraplegia) or other condition affecting the bladder
  • History or presence of cystitis caused by tuberculosis, radiation, or chemotherapy
  • Diagnosed and treated for a pelvic-related malignancy (colon, bladder, ovarian, endometrial, uterine, cervical, vaginal, or rectal cancer)
  • Physical or psychological comorbidity that would adversely affect ability to participate
  • Currently pregnant
  • Gross cognitive impairment, deafness, blindness, or severe vision/hearing problems that could not be accommodated
  • Current psychotherapy directed specifically toward relief of urological symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Learning to THRIVE Program
Participants received the six-week Learning to THRIVE online educational self-management program.
Behavioral: Learning to THRIVE (L2T) Program
A six-week online self-management program using a flipped-classroom format. Each week, participants reviewed asynchronous e-learning materials and attended one 60-90 minute live virtual group meeting facilitated by the research team. Content addressed goal setting and safe-group expectations; chronic pain and factors influencing pain; self-care, habits, and self-efficacy; relationships, communication, and sexual health; informed healthcare decision-making and evaluation of health claims; and reflection with long-term action planning.
Other Names:
  • Learning to THRIVE
  • L2T

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Enrolled During the Recruitment Period
Time Frame: During the recruitment period, approximately 3 weeks
Number of participants who provided informed consent and enrolled during the planned recruitment period. The protocol planned to recruit 16 participants.
During the recruitment period, approximately 3 weeks
Participant-Reported Time Spent Reviewing Weekly Asynchronous Lessons
Time Frame: Weekly during the 6-week intervention
Approximate time spent reviewing each weekly lesson, self-reported on the weekly lesson feedback form. Summarize using the metric used in the analysis (for example, median hours per week).
Weekly during the 6-week intervention
Number of Weekly Live Virtual Sessions Attended
Time Frame: During the 6-week intervention
Facilitator-recorded attendance across the six weekly synchronous virtual meetings. Each participant could attend 0 to 6 sessions; a percentage of sessions attended may also be derived.
During the 6-week intervention
Number of Enrolled Participants Retained Through the Final Follow-Up Assessment
Time Frame: From enrollment through 6 weeks after the 6-week intervention, approximately 12 weeks
Number and percentage of enrolled participants who remained in the study through the six-week post-intervention data-collection point. The protocol planned to recruit 16 participants and hoped to retain at least 12 through the intervention and post-intervention data-collection period.
From enrollment through 6 weeks after the 6-week intervention, approximately 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
O'Leary-Sant ICSI total score, range 0-20; higher scores indicate greater urinary/pain symptom severity.
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
O'Leary-Sant ICPI total score, range 0-16; higher scores indicate greater symptom-related problems.
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain Intensity Severity Category
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain intensity during the prior week assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 and categorized according to the protocol as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10).
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain Interference Severity Category
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain-related interference with activities during the prior week assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 and categorized as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10).
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain-Related Distress Severity Category
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Pain-related distress during the prior week assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 and categorized as none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10).
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Six-item SEMCD scale scored from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in managing chronic disease. The protocol included SEMCD as a quantitative outcome at all three assessments.
Baseline, immediately after the 6-week intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant Perceptions of Program Acceptability and Experience
Time Frame: Weekly during the 6-week intervention and within 1 month after intervention completion; open-ended survey data also collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention
Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions on the study surveys, weekly lesson feedback, recorded live group discussions, and semi-structured post-intervention interviews. Weekly feedback addressed key takeaways, useful content, areas needing greater clarity, and additional comments. Interviews explored expectations, program structure, content usefulness, facilitator/peer interaction, safety and comfort, application of learning, and whether participants would recommend the program. Data were prospectively planned for thematic analysis.
Weekly during the 6-week intervention and within 1 month after intervention completion; open-ended survey data also collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Indianapolis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 24, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 01889

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The informed consent permits possible future research use or sharing of de-identified study data, but a specific individual participant data sharing plan, access mechanism, and timetable have not yet been established.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings