Symptom Trajectory Approaches to Research (STAR)

September 1, 2026 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Defining Symptom Trajectories to Inform Risk-Stratified Approaches to Symptom Management in Children With Advanced Cancer

The goal of this observational study is to understand how cancer makes children feel over time. The main things the researchers hope to learn are:

  • When and how often do children have different feelings or sickness;
  • Why do these feelings happen; and,
  • How these feelings change a child's overall health.

Participants will answer simple surveys about their health.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The use of conventional and novel therapeutics to treat children with advanced cancer leads to burdensome physical and psychological symptoms. Advanced cancer is metastatic upon initial diagnosis, relapsed, progressed, or refractory to treatment, resulting in an uncertain and prolonged disease course. Symptom burden and associated suffering are amplified for these children due to disease burden, intense therapy, and often lengthy treatment. Symptom patterns (trajectories) have been identified in children diagnosed with early-stage cancer, but research characterizing symptom patterns over time in the understudied patient population of children with advanced cancer is sparse.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
228

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • New York -Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • OHSU Doernbecher Children's Hospital
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • American Family Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Potential participants will be identified through the pediatric hematology/oncology research team and/or clinicians.

Description

Inclusion Criteria - Children:

  • Aged 8-18 years
  • Diagnosis of advanced cancer of any type made by the hematology, oncology, or cellular therapy team
  • Undergoing cancer treatment or comfort care
  • Be English or Spanish literate

Inclusion Criteria - Caregivers:

  • Aged >18
  • Caregiver of a child diagnosed with advanced cancer
  • English or Spanish literate
  • Identified as being substantially involved in caring for the child

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition that would prevent participants from completing surveys

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Children with advanced cancer
Other: Health surveys
Participants will complete several surveys about their quality of life and health.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Ped-PRO-CTCAE)
Time Frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 4 months
Ped-PRO-CTCAE evaluates pediatric cancer symptoms using patient or caregiver reports scored on a 0-to-3 scale across attributes like frequency, severity, and interference. 38 items are scored 0-3, where 0 = never (or equivalent) and 3 = all the time (or equivalent). Scores range from 0 to 114, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. This score will be used to measure the trajectory of symptoms over time.
Baseline, bi-weekly for 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PROMIS Pediatric Global Health 7
Time Frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 4 months
PROMIS Pediatric Global Health 7 is a 7-item survey used to measure overall physical, mental, and social health in children and adolescents. It is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = poor and 5 = excellent. Scores range from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating better global health.
Baseline, bi-weekly for 4 months
Change in PROMIS Pediatric Mobility - Short Form 7a
Time Frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 4 months
PROMIS Pediatric Mobility is a 7-item questionnaire that evaluates self-perceived physical mobility and functioning in children and adolescents. It uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Without no trouble" to "Not able to do". Raw scores range from 7 to 35. Raw scores are translated into normalized T-scores with a US population-level mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. A T-score of 50 represents average mobility for the general population. Scores above 50 mean better-than-average mobility, while scores below 50 indicate greater impairment.
Baseline, bi-weekly for 4 months
Change in PROMIS Pediatric Physical Stress Experiences - Short Form 8a
Time Frame: Baseline, bi-weekly for 4 months
PROMIS Physical Stress Experiences is an 8-item questionnaire designed to measure physical symptoms of stress in children and adolescents. It is scored by summing the raw item responses (ranging from 8 to 40) and converting that total into a standardized T-score. The raw score maps to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10 for the general population. Higher T-scores reflect a greater level of physical stress.
Baseline, bi-weekly for 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Columbia University
Oregon Health and Science University
Nationwide Children's Hospital
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
OHSU Doernbecher Children's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kathleen (Kitty) Montgomery, PhD, RN, PCNS-BC, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Principal Investigator: Kristine Kwekkeboom, PhD, RN, FAAN, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Principal Investigator: Roger Brown, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2026-0259
  • UWMSN | Nursing | Administrati (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • 1R01CA307143 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • Protocol Version 2/11/26 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings