Evaluating the Impact of Vitamin D Supplementation on Healing Bed Sores in ICU.

September 6, 2026 updated by: Maha Salah
To study the value of vitamin D supplementation on healing bed sores in ICU patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Vitamin D deficiency is a prevalent and clinically significant factor associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients, including increased mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and delayed wound healing, particularly pressure ulcers. Given the established link between low vitamin D levels (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] < 20 ng/mL) and these complications, this study aims to investigate the impact of a high-dose vitamin D3 supplementation regimen (250,000 IU over five days) on facilitating Bed Sores healing in ICU patients. By elevating 25(OH)D concentrations to a therapeutic range (>30 ng/mL), we hypothesize that this intervention will contribute to enhanced patient outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Ain Shams University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

inclusion criteria:

1-Critically ill patients with bed sores Grade (1-2), (non-light) exudate admitted to ICUs.

2- Serum vitamin D <20 ng/mL. 3- Both genders. 4- Age: 18-60 years. 5- enteral access in place to enable delivery of vitamin D3 and are deemed to be able to tolerate enteral drug administration.

6- GCS > 9. 7- Serum Calcium (8-10 mg/dl). 8- Serum creatinine less than 1.4 mg/dL. exclusion criteria:

  1. Refusal of the legal guardian of the patient to participate in the study.
  2. Current pregnancy or lactating mother.
  3. Patients who are terminally ill and expected to die in less than 72 hours.
  4. Renal dysfunction (GFR < 30 mL/min) and the onset of dialysis during the study.
  5. Vitamin D supplementation in the last 15 days.
  6. Hypo/hyper-calcemia (adjusted calcium less than 8 mg/dL or above 10).
  7. History of disorders associated with hypercalcemia (history of cancer with history of hypercalcemia within the past 1 year, hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, nephrolithiasis).
  8. History of parathyroid dysfunction.
  9. Ongoing shock, [defined as unstable blood pressure despite vasopressor support and mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mm Hg on at least 3 consecutive readings within a 3-hour period prior to study entry].
  10. History of malabsorption syndromes; gastrointestinal intolerance (diarrhea, vomiting, or increased nasogastric aspirates).

11. History of adverse reaction to vitamin D supplementation. 12. known history of cirrhosis. 13. Patients taking any medications that have serious drug interactions with vitamin D like statins, orlistat, aluminum hydroxide (interfere with the absorption of vitamin D), digoxin (can enhance the effects of vitamin D on the heart leading to potential toxicity), and certain diuretics (can cause high calcium levels).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group A (Intervention group)
  • Patients will receive Enteral Vit-D 3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation.
  • One tablet of Biodal ® containing 50000 I.U. of vitamin d3 dissolved in 45 mL of milk daily for 5 consecutive days (total dose of 250,000 I.U.).
  • This group will be monitored during the study for Vitamin D toxicity symptoms & signs of including: vomiting (treated by giving anti emetic ondansetron IV), constipation (treated by giving lactulose syrup as laxative), irritability, Hypercalcemia and Renal impairment (treated by restricting vitamin D and calcium supplements, and fluid adjustment).
Drug: Enteral Vit-D 3 (cholecalciferol)
50000 I.U. of vitamin d3 dissolved in 45 mL of milk daily for 5 consecutive days (total dose of 250,000 I.U.)
No Intervention: Group B (Control Group)
No exogenous Vitamin D will be taken.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pressure Ulcer Healing From Baseline to Day 7, Assessed Using the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) Tool
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 after initiation of the study intervention.

Pressure ulcer healing will be assessed using the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH). The PUSH tool evaluates wound healing based on wound length × width (surface area), wound exudate amount, and tissue type. A total PUSH score is calculated, with lower scores indicating better healing. The change in PUSH score from baseline to Day 7 will be used to evaluate improvement in pressure-ulcer healing.

Calculation:

Change in PUSH score = PUSH score at Day 7 - PUSH score at baseline

A negative change indicates improvement/healing, whereas a positive change indicates deterioration.
Baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 after initiation of the study intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] Concentration From Baseline to Day 7
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 - approximately 7 days after initiation/administration of the study intervention.

The mean change in plasma 25(OH)D concentration from baseline (Day 0, before administration of the study intervention) to Day 7. The change is calculated as:

Change = 25(OH)D concentration at Day 7 - 25(OH)D concentration at baseline

The outcome is generally reported in ng/mL (or nmol/L). A positive change indicates an increase in vitamin D concentration, while a negative change indicates a decrease.
Baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 - approximately 7 days after initiation/administration of the study intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Maha Salah

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ain Shams University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 6, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FMASU MS 434/2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings