Dual Trigger VS HCG Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation in Normal Responders (DT-HCG-IVF)
Dual Trigger VS HCG Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation in Normal Responders a Randomized Controlled Trial
To compare the embryological and reproductive outcomes of dual trigger versus conventional hCG trigger for final oocyte maturation in normal responder patients undergoing ICSI cycles.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
To compare the embryological and reproductive outcomes of dual trigger versus conventional hCG trigger for final oocyte maturation in normal responder patients undergoing ICSI cycles.
- Dual Trigger Group: Participants will receive a GnRH agonist combined with hCG.
- hCG Trigger Group: Participants will receive hCG alone.
primary Outcomes
The following primary outcomes will be assessed:
• Number of mature (MII) oocytes (assessment at denudation). Secondary Outcomes
The following secondary outcomes will be assessed:
- Number of retrieved oocytes.
- Fertilization rate.
- Number and quality of embryos.
- Implantation rate.
- Clinical pregnancy rate.
- Multiple pregnancy rate.
- Incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ahmed MM Gebreel, MSc
- Phone Number: +201092576506
- Email: agebreel@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Cairo Governorate
-
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
- Recruiting
- ART Unit, International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research, Al-Azhar University
-
Contact:
- Administration Office
- Phone Number: +201066634172
- Email: iicpsr_azhar2@hotmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ahmed MM Gebreel, MSc.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ehab HM Hasanin, Prof.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Mohamed S. Abdelall, Prof.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 20-40 years.
- Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m².
- Undergoing ICSI treatment using a GnRH antagonist protocol.
- Normal ovarian reserve and expected normal ovarian response.
- AMH between 1.2 - 3.5 ng/ml
- AFC 7-15 follicle.
- First or second ICSI cycle.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor ovarian response (Bologna/POSEIDON criteria)
- High ovarian response with a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) AMH > 3.5 ng/ml or AFC > 15 follicle.
- Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
- Serum E2 level > 3500 pg/ml at day of triggering.
- Endocrine disorders including diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, or Cushing syndrome.
- Congenital uterine abnormalities.
- Severe systemic diseases affecting fertility outcomes.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Dual Trigger
Dual Trigger Group: Participants will receive a GnRH agonist combined with hCG |
Dual Trigger Group: Participants will receive a GnRH agonist combined with hCG for normal responders patients doing ICSI.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: HCG Trigger
HCGTrigger Group: Participants will receive hCG alone. |
hCG Trigger Group: Participants will receive hCG alone the standard for normal responders doing ICSI.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oocytes Maturation
Time Frame: From oocyte retrieval until completion of oocyte assessment, approximately 0-2 hours after retrieval.
|
Percentage of retrieved oocytes that are at the metaphase II (MII) stage. |
From oocyte retrieval until completion of oocyte assessment, approximately 0-2 hours after retrieval.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of MII oocytes
Time Frame: At oocyte retrieval (Day 0), approximately 0-2 hours after oocyte pick up.
|
Number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved |
At oocyte retrieval (Day 0), approximately 0-2 hours after oocyte pick up.
|
|
Number of oocytes retrieved
Time Frame: Day of oocyte retrieval (Day 0) after oocyte retrieval.
|
Total number of oocytes retrieved during oocyte retrieval. |
Day of oocyte retrieval (Day 0) after oocyte retrieval.
|
|
Fertilization rate
Time Frame: Approximately 16-18 hours after insemination/ICSI
|
Percentage of normally fertilized mature oocytes (2PN) |
Approximately 16-18 hours after insemination/ICSI
|
|
Embryo utilization rate
Time Frame: Day 3-5 after oocyte retrieval
|
Percentage of normally fertilized oocytes resulting in embryos suitable for transfer or cryopreservation |
Day 3-5 after oocyte retrieval
|
|
Clinical pregnancy rate
Time Frame: Approximately 5-7 weeks after embryo transfer
|
Percentage of embryo transfer cycles resulting in an intrauterine gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity |
Approximately 5-7 weeks after embryo transfer
|
|
Incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)
Time Frame: From the day of trigger administration until 14 days after oocyte retrieval
|
Proportion of participants developing OHSS following controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval, classified according to predefined diagnostic/severity criteria. |
From the day of trigger administration until 14 days after oocyte retrieval
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Ehab HM Hasanin, Professor, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Al-Azhar University.
- Study Director: Mohamed S. Abdelall, Professor, International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Zhou X, Guo P, Chen X, Ye D, Liu Y, Chen S. Comparison of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus hCG alone trigger of oocyte maturation for normal ovarian responders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;141(3):327-331. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12457. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
- Chung RK, Mancuso AC, Summers KM, Sparks AE, Duran HE, Mejia RB. Dual trigger protocol is an effective in vitro fertilization strategy in both normal and high responders without compromising pregnancy outcomes in fresh cycles. F S Rep. 2021 May 27;2(3):314-319. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.05.008. eCollection 2021 Sep.
- Gao F, Wang Y, Fu M, Zhang Q, Ren Y, Shen H, Han H. Effect of a "Dual Trigger" Using a GnRH Agonist and hCG on the Cumulative Live-Birth Rate for Normal Responders in GnRH-Antagonist Cycles. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 25;8:683210. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.683210. eCollection 2021.
- Albeitawi S, Marar EA, Reshoud FA, Hamadneh J, Hamza R, Alhasan G, Omeish H, Vigano P. Dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves oocyte yield in normal responders on GnRH-antagonist cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Jan 17;26(1):28-32. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210039.
- Yan MH, Cao JX, Hou JW, Jiang WJ, Wang DD, Sun ZG, Song JY. GnRH Agonist and hCG (Dual Trigger) Versus hCG Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation in Expected Normal Responders With a High Immature Oocyte Rate: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Superiority, Parallel Group, Controlled Trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 28;13:831859. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.831859. eCollection 2022.
- Andersen CY, Kelsey T, Mamsen LS, Vuong LN. Shortcomings of an unphysiological triggering of oocyte maturation using human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril. 2020 Aug;114(2):200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.022. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
- Eftekhar M, Mojtahedi MF, Miraj S, Omid M. Final follicular maturation by administration of GnRH agonist plus HCG versus HCG in normal responders in ART cycles: An RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017 Jul;15(7):429-434.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Infertility
- Long Qt Syndrome 3
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Pituitary Hormone-Releasing Hormones
- Hypothalamic Hormones
- Peptide Hormones
- Neuropeptides
- Peptides
- Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
- Oligopeptides
- Nerve Tissue Proteins
- Proteins
- Gonadotropins
- Placental Hormones
- Pregnancy Proteins
- Triptorelin Pamoate
- Chorionic Gonadotropin
- Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Obs-Gyn-1000/2026/07/0020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
raw data and master sheet can be shared
IPD Sharing Time Frame
After completion of study will be available for one year
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
request by email agebreel@hotmail.com
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.