Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) Study Using Alloplastic Biomaterial and a Resorbable Synthetic Membrane. A Digital Workflow (CBCT/Scanner) Evaluates Hard and Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes at 4 Months, Validating Support for the Gingival Phenotype and Buccal Bone Plate.
EVALUACIÓN MEDIANTE FLUJO DIGITAL DEL IMPACTO DE LAS TERAPIAS DE PRESERVACIÓN ALVEOLAR EN LA ESTABILIDAD DIMENSIONAL DE LOS TEJIDOS
The dimensional collapse of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction represents a critical challenge for implant rehabilitation. This research proposes an alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) protocol based on the combination of a slow-resorbing alloplastic synthetic biomaterial and a polymer-based resorbable synthetic membrane. Through a digital workflow integrating cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning (Carestream 3800), volumetric changes in hard and soft tissues will be monitored. The study will compare baseline conditions with outcomes at 4 months of healing, analyzing whether the use of the membrane ensures adequate support for the gingival phenotype and minimizes buccal bone plate resorption.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (>18 years of age) with full cognitive capacity to understand and sign the Informed Consent approved by the UCAM Ethics Committee (in accordance with the 2022-23 Regulation).
- Presence of at least one non-restorable mandibular premolar (first or second) or first mandibular molar with a clear indication for extraction and subsequent implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation.
- Buccal Bone Plate Integrity: Clinically intact buccal bone wall following baseline clinical examination and tomographic confirmation (T0 CBCT), presenting a continuous residual thickness of at least 1 mm, with no evidence of bone dehiscences or fenestrations prior to surgery (Type 1 sockets according to the Elian / Juodzbalys classification).
- Absence of Active Infectious Processes: Surgical site free of signs of acute or exacerbated chronic infection. This excludes the presence of active suppuration, productive fistulas, periodontal abscesses, or extensive osteolytic periapical lesions (>2 mm in radiographic diameter) that could alter tissue pH or destabilize the biomaterial.
- Adequate or stabilized general periodontal health, defined by a Full-Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) ≤ 20% and Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS) ≤ 20%.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with uncontrolled systemic medical conditions that compromise bone or mucosal healing (e.g., Diabetes Mellitus with HbA1c >7%, severe calcium metabolism disorders, severe hepatopathies, or nephropathies).
- Patients undergoing active treatment with drugs that alter bone remodeling, such as systemic bisphosphonates (oral or intravenous), denosumab, or prolonged systemic corticosteroid therapies.
- History of previous radiotherapy in the head and neck region, or active medical oncology.
- Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day) due to the demonstrated deleterious impact of nicotine on angiogenesis and gingival collagen maturation, or substance abuse.
- Pregnant or actively lactating women at the time of inclusion.
- Any defect, intraoperative fracture, or unforeseen lesion detected in the buccal bone plate during the surgical extraction maneuver that compromises the baseline condition of alveolar wall integrity.
- Patient inability to attend the rigorous follow-up appointments scheduled at 4 months, or severe claustrophobia preventing the acquisition of records via CBCT or intraoral scanning with the CS 3800.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental: Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) utilizing a Slow-Resorbing Synthetic Alloplast and a
Following atraumatic tooth extraction and rigorous socket debridement, the alveolar defect will be grafted with a slow-resorbing synthetic alloplastic bone substitute. A resorbable polymer-based synthetic barrier membrane will be adapted over the graft material. The surgical site will be managed via a [flapped / flapless] approach and stabilizing sutures will be placed to allow for [primary / secondary] intention healing. No loading or prosthetic provisionalization will be applied over the grafted socket during the 4-month healing period. |
This experimental intervention is distinguished by a fully synthetic, animal-free grafting protocol. Following a strictly flapless tooth extraction to preserve periosteal blood supply to the buccal bundle bone, the socket is grafted with a slow-resorbing synthetic alloplastic bone substitute, designed to act as a long-term space maintainer rather than a rapidly turning-over material. Crucially, the graft is covered by a polymer-based resorbable synthetic membrane, distinguishing it from standard protocols utilizing native or cross-linked collagen. The membrane is stabilized using non-resorbable cross-mattress sutures. To prevent distortion of the mucogingival junction, no periosteal releasing incisions are performed, and the site is left to heal by secondary intention with the membrane intentionally left exposed to the oral environment |
|
Other: No Intervention: Unassisted Spontaneous Healing (Natural Blood Clot)
Following atraumatic tooth extraction and rigorous socket debridement, the alveolar defect will be left to heal spontaneously without the application of any bone graft material or barrier membrane. A natural blood clot will be allowed to form and stabilize within the socket. The surgical site will be managed strictly via a flapless approach, with stabilizing sutures placed only if necessary to secure the coagulum and achieve hemostasis. The socket will undergo unassisted secondary intention healing during the 4-month observation period prior to implant placement evaluation. |
This control intervention is strictly distinguished by the complete absence of any ridge preservation biomaterials. It represents the baseline dimensional collapse of the alveolar ridge. Following a minimally invasive, flapless tooth extraction identical to the experimental arm, the socket is vigorously debrided but left unassisted to heal via a natural blood clot. To distinguish this true negative control from active comparators, no hemostatic agents (e.g., oxidized regenerated cellulose or gelatin sponges) are placed within the alveolus. Sutures are applied strictly to stabilize the existing gingival margins and secure the coagulum, allowing physiological secondary intention healing without any artificial space maintenance |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Volumetric Change of the Alveolar Ridge Contour
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0, immediately post-extraction) and at 4 months post-operative.
|
The primary outcome is the total volumetric alteration of the alveolar ridge, encompassing combined hard and soft tissue dimensional changes. This will be quantified in cubic millimeters (mm^3) through a digital superimposition protocol. Baseline (Day 0) intraoral surface scans (STL) and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) DICOM files will be spatially aligned with 4-month (T1) postoperative STL and CBCT datasets using specialized image analysis software. A standardized Region of Interest (ROI) will be established using stable anatomical landmarks (e.g., adjacent teeth, hard palate) to calculate the absolute volume loss or gain |
Baseline (Day 0, immediately post-extraction) and at 4 months post-operative.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CE062612
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.