Targeting Sleep and Slow-Wave Activity to Enhance Cognition in MCI (TASSLE)

October 28, 2026 updated by: Hyun "Monica" Kim, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Study Description As most clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been unsuccessful to date, it has become increasingly crucial to focus on treating earlier stages of the disease. Compelling evidence indicates that sleep disruption is associated with accumulation of Alzheimer's biomarkers, including amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau pathology. Slow-wave activity (SWA) during sleep is particularly important for the clearance of Aβ and sleep-dependent memory consolidation, and sleep disturbance could reduce the amount of time spent in slow-wave sleep. Together, these findings suggest that treating sleep disruption in older adults may help reduce the level of adverse brain aging.

The goal of this study is to better understand the effect of sleep interventions on improving sleep and building cognitive resilience in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and to assess the feasibility of relevant study protocols. Fifty older adults (ages 60-85) with aMCI and sleep disturbance (Insomnia Severity Index score of 8 or greater) will be randomized 1:1 to one of two treatment arms: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia only (CBT-I + Sham), or CBT-I combined with acoustic slow-wave activity enhancement (CBT-I + SWAE). CBT-I is a psychotherapy intervention designed to address maladaptive cognitive and behavioral patterns associated with sleep and bedtime. SWAE is administered through non-invasive earbuds (Smartbuds, NextSense Inc.) that detect and amplify endogenous slow-wave activity using acoustic pulses during sleep.

Each participant will complete 3 visits over approximately 6 months: a baseline visit, a post-treatment visit (approximately 12 weeks after baseline), and a 6-month follow-up visit. Group differences will be compared on changes in cognitive performance and plasma biomarkers of AD (phosphorylated tau [pTau-217]) across these time points. The study will also explore potential mechanisms behind the relationship between sleep and cognition/biomarkers by investigating a range of objectively measured sleep metrics (e.g., sleep architecture, sleep duration, arousals) along with depressive symptoms.

Hypotheses:

CBT-I will be associated with more favorable outcomes (i.e., less decline or greater improvement) in frontal network functioning (sustained attention/target detection, executive functions), while SWAE will be associated with better outcomes in measures of episodic memory (word-list learning and story recall). Improvements in total sleep time and insomnia symptoms at 8 weeks are hypothesized to mediate the relationship between CBT-I and performance on attention and executive functions over 6 months, while improvements in slow-wave non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep at 12 weeks are hypothesized to mediate the relationship between SWAE and episodic memory measures. Additionally, CBT-I is hypothesized to be associated with increased scores on the Visuospatial Abilities, Planning, Organization, and Divided Attention subscales of the Everyday Cognition (ECog) questionnaire after 6 months, while SWAE is hypothesized to be associated with a significant increase in the Everyday Memory subscale.

Objectives:

Aim 1: To determine if CBT-I and SWAE have different neuropsychological outcomes in aMCI.

Aim 2: To examine the impact of sleep treatments on cognitively mediated everyday functioning.

Exploratory Aim: To assess whether CBT-I and/or SWAE are associated with changes in plasma pTau and whether pTau moderates the association between sleep and cognition.

Results from this study will determine whether sleep interventions can build brain and cognitive resilience in the context of aging, and will inform the design of a future, larger-scale R01 study rigorously examining the association between targeted sleep modifications and markers of AD pathophysiology as a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking, ages 60-85 years Telephone MMSE (T-MMSE) score of 22 or greater at screening Diagnosis of amnestic MCI, per Logical Memory (LM) delayed recall and QDRS criteria (education-adjusted LM cutoffs; QDRS total ≥1.5 with memory subscore ≥0.5) Presence of sleep disturbance, defined as Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score ≥8 at baseline Capacity to provide informed consent Access to a stable internet connection Availability of a family member or other informant in regular contact with the participant, willing to serve as an informant (telephone informant acceptable)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of stroke or excessive cardiovascular disease risk Neurologic disease, including movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, or traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness >15 minutes Untreated diabetes Active cancer treatment Telephone MMSE score below 22, or Logical Memory score above education-adjusted cutoffs (indicating no cognitive impairment) Sleep disorders other than insomnia (moderate-to-severe sleep apnea, REM behavior disorder, restless legs syndrome, circadian rhythm disorder); mild sleep apnea is not exclusionary Current DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, substance/alcohol use disorder, or bipolar disorder Use of sleep aids (prescription or OTC) within the past 14 days Use of antidepressants with significant anticholinergic properties (e.g., amitriptyline, doxepin, mirtazapine - full list in protocol) Use of benzodiazepines (e.g., diazepam, lorazepam, alprazolam - full list in protocol) Moderate-to-severe depression (Geriatric Depression Scale >8) Inability to provide an informant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sham Comparator: Sham Condition

This sham condition includes the device being worn without any active pink noise engagement
Device: Control Intervention

Sham condition (device worn without active enhancement)
Active Comparator: Slow Wave Enhancement

Slow wave enhancement via NextSense SmartBuds
Device: active intervention

slow wave sleep enhancement vi NextSense Smart buds

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Attention/Executive Function Composite Score
Time Frame: 8 weeks and 6 months

Composite of performance on the No Practice Effect (NPE) test battery measures of frontal network functioning, including N-back (target detection/working memory), Letter-Number Span (executive function), Symbol Coding (processing speed), and Verbal Fluency. Change reflects Hypothesis 1a (CBT-I predicted to show greater improvement on this domain).
8 weeks and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Everyday Cognition (ECog) Subscale Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months

Informant-rated change on ECog subscales, including Everyday Memory, Visuospatial Abilities, Planning, Organization, and Divided Attention, assessing cognitively mediated everyday functioning (Aim 2/Hypothesis 2).
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
New York State Psychiatric Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Alzheimer's Association

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NYSPI2026-213
  • 26AARGA-1567554 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Alzheimer's Association)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings