Aggression in Military Personnel (MERA)
Reducing Aggression in Military Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial
We propose to study if Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) is helpful in reducing anger and aggression in active duty service members by comparing it to self monitoring of one's anger and aggression. The proposed study has two treatment groups. The first group will receive MERA and then monitor their anger and aggression for 3 more weeks. The second group will be asked to monitor their anger and aggression for 3 weeks prior to receiving MERA. All service members will receive MERA and will be asked to self-monitor, but the order in which they are asked to complete these tasks will be randomized.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Shannon R Miles, PhD
- Phone Number: 106728 8139-972-2000
- Email: shannon.miles@va.gov
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Michelle Gaudet
- Phone Number: 813-485-2968
- Email: Michelle.Gaudet@va.gov
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Active duty service member 18 years or older.
- Currently meets criteria for full or subthreshold PTSD, determined by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5-R (CAPS-5-R; Jackson et al., 2024) endorsing trauma exposure and a score of > 3 on at least 1 Cluster B, 1 Cluster C, 1 Cluster D, and 1 Cluster E symptom. Symptoms must be present for at least 1 month with clinically significant distress and/or functional impairment (items 23-25 with scores of > 2).
- Engaged in at least 3 self-reported aggressive acts (e.g., yelling, throwing objects, hitting objects/people) in the last month, measured by the 20-item Overt Aggression Scale (OAS; Yudofsky et al., 1986).
- Impulsive aggression is primary form of aggression, determined by the Impulsive Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS; Standford et al., 2001).
- Clinically significant anger determined by scores of >12 on the Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR-5; Forbes et al., 2014) scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Currently suicidal or homicidal ideation severe enough to warrant immediate attention (as determined by the Depressive Symptoms Index - Suicidality Subscale and the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview short form) and corroborated by a clinical risk assessment by a credentialed provider.
-
Unable to complete self-report measures based on clinical judgement.
-
Current manic episode as indicated on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ; Hirschfeld et al., 2000) or experiencing psychotic symptoms as indicated on the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16; Ising et al., 2012) requiring immediate stabilization or hospitalization (as determined by clinical assessment and judgment).
-
Had a psychotropic medication change within 4 weeks prior to the baseline assessment. Service members receiving general mental health services or engaging in usual care will be allowed to participate.
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) X Self-Monitoring
MERA followed by Self-Monitoring. |
Three session treatment that teaches the adaptive value of emotions and emotion regulation skills. Three weeks of tracking anger and aggression and weekly check-ins with study team to assess for risk level. |
|
Active Comparator: Self-Monitoring X Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA)
Self-monitoring followed by MERA. |
Three session treatment that teaches the adaptive value of emotions and emotion regulation skills. Three weeks of tracking anger and aggression and weekly check-ins with study team to assess for risk level. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overt Aggression Scale - Modified (OAS-M)
Time Frame: Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.
|
Overt Aggression Scale (OAS; Yudofsky et al., 1986) is a 16-item self-report measure that assesses frequency of verbal and physical aggression against self, other, and objects. Investigators added 3 items to assess aggression while driving and in virtual communication (e.g. aggression while texting or emailing) and gave a blank for other aggressive behavior. Investigators adapted the instructions to rate aggression over the past week. There are 20 items on the OAS-M. Pilot data demonstrated that this adapted measure is sensitive to detect changes in aggression frequency during the 3 weeks of MERA (Miles, Kent, et al., 2020). Self-reported aggressive acts will be summed to create an OAS total frequency count of aggressive acts at each assessment, with greater scores indicating more acts of aggression in the past week. |
Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.
|
|
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2: State Anger (STAXI-2 S-Anger) Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.
|
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 Subscale-Anger (STAXI-2 S-Anger; Spielberger, 2010) is a 15-item subscale from the STAXI-2 that measures anger. Investigators adapted the instructions to measure anger in the past week. Items in this subscale ask participants to indicate how much they are experiencing certain feelings and desires on a four-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Scores are summed to assess the overall intensity of anger felt in the past week. The total score range is 15-60, with greater scores indicating higher levels of anger. |
Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shannon Miles, PhD, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Yudofsky SC, Silver JM, Jackson W, Endicott J, Williams D. The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Jan;143(1):35-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.1.35.
- Spielberger CD. STAXI-2: State-trait anger expression inventory - 2. 1999. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
- Miles SR, Kent TA, Stanley M, Thompson KE, Sharp C, Niles BL, Young-McCaughan S, Mintz J, Roache JD, Litz BT, Hale WJ, Stanford MS, Keane TM, Peterson AL; Consortium to Alleviate PTSD. Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression: A Pilot Study of a Brief Treatment to Help Veterans Reduce Impulsive Aggression. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020 Nov;208(11):897-903. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001229.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders
- Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia
- Mental Disorders
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Stress Disorders, Traumatic
- Behavior
- Social Behavior
- Aggression
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
- Investigative Techniques
- Therapeutics
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques
- Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Diagnosis
- Blood Chemical Analysis
- Clinical Chemistry Tests
- Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine
- Monitoring, Physiologic
- Self-Testing
- Self Care
- Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRBnet #: 1937626
- HT94252510651 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of War)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Sharing of the data collected in the conduct of the proposed project will be deposited into the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) and the UT Health San Antonio Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved STRONG STAR Repository (HSC2010-475H) for future use.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
One year after the end of the study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Any future research using Repository data will require a research protocol for the proposed study reviewed and approved by an authorized official responsible for protecting human subjects of research. The data protections for privacy and confidentiality described in the consent form will apply to any future use of stored data.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.