Neurofeedback Training for Adolescents and Young Adults With Borderline Intellectual Functioning (NFB-BIF)

November 5, 2026 updated by: Yerin Hong, Seoul University of Buddhism

The Effects of Sequential Alpha-Low-Beta Neurofeedback on Mental Health, Social Skills, Attention and QEEG in Adolescents and Young Adults With Borderline Intellectual Functioning: A Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Pilot Trial

This randomized waitlist-controlled pilot trial examines whether sequential alpha (8-12 Hz) and low-beta (12-15 Hz) neurofeedback training improves mental health, social skills, attention, and quantitative EEG (QEEG) in adolescents and young adults with borderline intellectual functioning (slow learners). Thirteen participants aged 13 to 39 years were randomly assigned to a neurofeedback group (n = 7) or a waitlist control group (n = 6). The neurofeedback group completes 20 sessions (twice weekly, 50 minutes each) using a 2-channel prefrontal (Fp1, Fp2) headband device. Outcomes are assessed before and after the intervention period. The primary outcome is mean reaction time on the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT). Secondary outcomes include the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), the Korean Social Skills Rating System for college students (K-SSRS), PVT lapse rate, and 19-channel QEEG relative power.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background: Individuals with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) fall between intellectual disability and average intellectual functioning and often lack access to formal disability services. Their difficulties in mental health, social functioning, and attention can be understood as manifestations of a common vulnerability in self-regulation (emotional, behavioral, and cognitive), which is closely related to prefrontal cortex function. Because prefrontal maturation continues from adolescence into young adulthood, this transitional period may be particularly responsive to intervention. Neurofeedback is a non-invasive, non-pharmacological method that trains individuals to self-regulate their brain activity through real-time feedback.

Design: Randomized pretest-posttest control group design with an embedded qualitative component (embedded mixed methods design). After recruitment was completed, 13 eligible participants were assigned to the experimental or waitlist control group in a single batch by simple randomization using a computer-generated random sequence (Research Randomizer). Participants were not blinded. Post-test QEEG recordings were performed by a research assistant unaware of group allocation and by the principal investigator, who was not blinded.

Intervention: Each 50-minute session consists of 5 minutes of baseline stabilization with diaphragmatic breathing, 20 minutes of alpha (8-12 Hz) neurofeedback, a 5-minute rest, and 20 minutes of low-beta (12-15 Hz) neurofeedback, delivered with the NeuroBrain device (Neuro21, Korea), which records from Fp1 and Fp2. Auditory and visual feedback is provided when the target frequency reaches the threshold. Training is delivered twice weekly for 20 sessions (August 18 to October 31, 2026). The waitlist group maintains usual daily activities and is offered the same training after the study.

Measurements: 19-channel resting-state eyes-closed EEG (BrainMaster Discovery, linked-ear montage, impedance 5 kOhm or below) analyzed with NeuroGuide; BSI-18; K-SSRS (college version); 5-minute PVT implemented in PsychoPy; and a 5-item researcher-developed social validity questionnaire (experimental group, post-test only). Experimental group participants who give separate consent take part in an approximately 30-minute semi-structured interview after the post-test, analyzed by thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006).

Analysis: Because of the small sample, all inferential tests are non-parametric (two-sided alpha = .05). Within-group changes are tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and between-group differences in change scores (post minus pre) with the Mann-Whitney U test, reporting exact p values and effect size r (= Z / sqrt(N)). Associations among change scores are examined with Spearman correlation. Per-protocol analysis includes participants attending at least 16 of 20 sessions (80%). A sensitivity analysis repeats the analyses in participants aged 19 years or older. Because the initially planned sample (N = 44, G*Power) could not be reached, the study is conducted as a pilot study and effect sizes will inform future sample size estimation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • South Korea
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • Hong Yerin Brain Health Institute
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • Magok Cultural Center
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • Seoul University of Buddhism, Institute of Brain Science

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 39 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 13 to 39 years and, for those of school age, enrolled in middle school or above
  • Full-scale IQ of 71-84 on the K-WAIS-IV or K-WISC-V, or officially identified as a slow learner by a borderline intellectual functioning support organization (participants identified by a support organization without a diagnosis of intellectual disability may have an IQ below 71)
  • Able to communicate in Korean and complete self-report questionnaires
  • Vision and hearing sufficient for neurofeedback training
  • Voluntary written informed consent; for participants under 19 years, written consent from a legal guardian as well

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological disorders that may affect EEG measurement or interpretation (e.g., epilepsy, brain tumor, stroke)
  • Diagnosis of intellectual disability
  • Major mental health crisis within the past 6 months
  • Previous neurofeedback training
  • Use of implanted electronic medical devices (e.g., pacemaker, cochlear implant)

Psychiatric medication use is not an exclusion criterion; medication names and use are recorded and considered in interpretation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Neurofeedback

Sequential alpha-low-beta neurofeedback training, 20 sessions, twice weekly, 50 minutes per session.
Device: Sequential Alpha-Low-Beta Neurofeedback

Neurofeedback using a 2-channel prefrontal (Fp1, Fp2) headband device (NeuroBrain, Neuro21, Korea). Each 50-minute session comprises 5 minutes of baseline stabilization with diaphragmatic breathing, 20 minutes of alpha (8-12 Hz) training, a 5-minute rest, and 20 minutes of low-beta (12-15 Hz) training, with auditory and visual feedback when target activity is reached. Twenty sessions are delivered twice weekly.

Other Names:
  • NeuroBrain neurofeedback
No Intervention: Waitlist Control

Participants maintain usual daily activities during the study period and are offered the same neurofeedback training after study completion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean Reaction Time on the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Mean reaction time (milliseconds) on a 5-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Test implemented in PsychoPy (interstimulus interval 1-4 s). Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline. Baseline is the pre-test before the first training session; Week 13 is the post-test after completion of the 20-session intervention. Lower values indicate better sustained attention.
Baseline and Week 13

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PVT Lapse Rate
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Percentage of Psychomotor Vigilance Test responses slower than 500 ms. Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline. Lower values indicate fewer attentional lapses.
Baseline and Week 13
Change in Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) Total and Subscale Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Brief Symptom Inventory-18: 18 items rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely); somatization, depression, and anxiety subscales (6 items each; range 0-24) and total score (range 0-72). Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress (worse outcome). Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline.
Baseline and Week 13
Change in Korean Social Skills Rating System for College Students (K-SSRS) Total and Subscale Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Korean version of the Social Skills Rating System for college students: 27 items rated from 1 (never) to 7 (very often); empathy, cooperation, self-control, and assertion subscales; total score range 27-189. Higher scores indicate better social skills (better outcome). Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline.
Baseline and Week 13
Change in QEEG Relative Power (Theta, Alpha, Low-Beta)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

FFT relative power (percentage of total power) of theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), and low-beta (12-15 Hz) bands from 19-channel eyes-closed resting EEG, analyzed with NeuroGuide. Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline.
Baseline and Week 13
Change in QEEG Theta/Beta Ratio
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Ratio of theta (4-8 Hz) power to beta power (unitless ratio) from 19-channel eyes-closed resting EEG, analyzed with NeuroGuide. Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline.
Baseline and Week 13

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in QEEG Interhemispheric Amplitude Asymmetry (Exploratory)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Amplitude asymmetry (percentage) between homologous electrode pairs from 19-channel eyes-closed resting EEG, analyzed with NeuroGuide. Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline.
Baseline and Week 13
Correlations Among Change Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho, range -1 to 1) among change scores (Week 13 minus baseline) in BSI-18, K-SSRS, PVT, and QEEG variables, examining whether changes in emotional, behavioral, and cognitive self-regulation are related.
Baseline and Week 13
Social Validity Questionnaire Total Score
Time Frame: Week 13

Researcher-developed 5-item Social Validity Questionnaire covering goal importance (2 items), procedure acceptability (2 items), and perceived effect (1 item), each rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); total score range 5-25. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability (better outcome). Experimental group only, assessed at the Week 13 post-test.
Week 13
Participants' Perceptions of Training Experience and Daily-Life Changes
Time Frame: Week 13 to Week 15

Themes from an approximately 30-minute individual semi-structured interview conducted after the Week 13 post-test, analyzed by thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Experimental group participants who give separate consent.
Week 13 to Week 15
Change in QEEG Coherence (Exploratory)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Coherence (percentage, 0-100) between electrode pairs from 19-channel eyes-closed resting EEG, analyzed with NeuroGuide. Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline.
Baseline and Week 13
Change in QEEG Phase Lag (Exploratory)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13

Phase lag (degrees) between electrode pairs from 19-channel eyes-closed resting EEG, analyzed with NeuroGuide. Change is calculated as Week 13 minus baseline.
Baseline and Week 13

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul University of Buddhism

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Magok Cultural Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yerin Hong, Seoul University of Buddhism

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 8, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 7, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 21, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 27004121AN01-202606-HR-090-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared because participants include minors and adults with borderline intellectual functioning, and consent was not obtained for data sharing beyond the research team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings