Progressive Scapular-Focused Exercises for Neck Pain Related to Scapular Dysfunction

November 5, 2026 updated by: Nipaporn Wannaprom, University of Phayao

Effects of a Progressive Scapular-Focused Exercise Program in People With Neck Pain Related to Scapular Dysfunction

Neck pain is often associated with scapular dysfunction. However, this relationship is not present in all cases. Previous studies on scapular-focused exercises have reported inconsistent findings, possibly due to limitations in identifying individuals with scapular-related neck pain and in the specificity and progression of exercise programs. This trial aims to investigate the effects of a Progressive Scapular-Focused Exercise Program (PSEP), compared with routine physical therapy, on neck pain intensity, neck disability, scapular muscle strength, scapular position, cervical range of motion, upper limb disability, and global perceived benefit in individuals with neck pain related to scapular dysfunction.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 59 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • nonspecific neck pain for at least 3 months
  • an average neck pain intensity over the past week ≥ 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)
  • a score of neck pain and disability ≥ 10/ 100 on the Neck Disability Index-Thai version
  • scapular dysfunction on the more painful side of neck pain
  • scapular dysfunction related to neck pain, based on improvements in cervical rotation range of motion and/or neck pain intensity following scapular repositioning test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of head, neck and shoulder injury, trauma, fracture, or surgery
  • any neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that may affect upper extremity function or study outcomes
  • current shoulder or arm pain
  • receiving physiotherapy treatment for their neck conditions in the past 12 months
  • receiving specific exercises for the neck, shoulder, or scapular muscles in the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Progressive Scapular-Focused Exercise Program

Intervention group

The program includes axioscapular muscle stretching, axioscapular muscle control exercises, strengthening and endurance training of the axioscapular muscles, and postural correction during sitting, standing, walking, and upper-limb movements (approximately 45 minutes per session). Participants will attend 12 individual treatment sessions (2 visits per week for 6 weeks).

Active Comparator: Routine Physical Therapy Treatment

Control

The treatment includes routine physical therapy (e.g., modalities, range of motion and/or gentle stretching exercise) (approximately 45 minutes per session). The participants will attend 12 individual treatment sessions (2 visits per week for 6 weeks).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck pain intensity
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

The average intensity of neck pain will be assessed using a 0-10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.
Neck disability
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be used to assess the impact of neck pain on daily activities and self-reported disability. The questionnaire consists of 10 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater neck-related disability.

At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.
Scapular muscle strength
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

Scapular muscle strength (lower trapezius and serratus anterior) will be assessed using a handheld dynamometer.

At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.
Scapular position
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

Scapular position will be assessed using the Lateral Scapular Slide Test.

At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cervical range of motion
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

Cervical range of motion will be measured in degrees during flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion, and left and right rotation.

At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.
Upper limb disability
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

Upper limb disability will be assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 30 items assessing symptoms and functional limitations of the arm, shoulder, and hand. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.
Global perceived benefit of treatment
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

Global perceived benefit of treatment will be assessed using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).

At baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HREC-UP-HSST 1.2/157/69
  • 2394/2568 (Other Grant/Funding Number: University of Phayao and Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund (Fundamental Fund 2026))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.