Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Traditional Labor Epidural

Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Traditional Labor Epidural: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Maternal and Fetal Effects

The purpose of this study to compare the use of spinal-epidural versus traditional labor epidural on maternal and fetal effects. The hope is to determine the safest and most effective epidural method of relieving pain during labor.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) was developed to allow excellent pain control for the pregnant woman who arrives in advanced labor and does not have much time for the anesthetic to have its effect. This has been extended recently to women in all stages of labor because of its rapid and excellent control of pain. Recent case series comparing CSE with traditional epidural have shown a slight difference in the rate of hypotension and fetal bradycardia, with the CSE technique having a higher rate of both of these side effects. This study will compare the two techniques in a prospective, randomized method.

The aim is to compare the maternal and fetal effects of two neuraxial block techniques for pain control during labor, to document blood pressure changes in upper and lower extremities pre- and post- block placement, and to document side effects (e.g. pruritus) and patient satisfaction with both techniques.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

127

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • New York-Presbyterian Hospital; Weill Medical College of Cornell

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is able to read, understand and voluntarily sign the approved informed consent form (ICF) prior to any study- specific procedure;
  • Must be between 18 to 50 years of age.
  • Must be carrying a singleton fetus at term.
  • Must have less than a body mass index of 40.
  • Must be in labor, or is having a medical induction of labor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has chronic renal disease, pre-existing hypertension, or pre-eclampsia.
  • Patient who is undergoing an elective cesarean delivery
  • Patient who has a presence of non-reassuring fetal status
  • Patient who has an abnormal or non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CSE
Subjects assigned to this group will receive "combined spinal-epidural" (CSE) to relieve pain during labor. For CSE, subjects receive a small amount of a local anesthetic and a small amount of a narcotic pain killer directly into the spinal canal (a smaller amount than is given for traditional epidural), followed by a small amount of both of these medications that is continuously infused into the epidural space through a catheter that is left in place. CSE is not experimental.
Bupivacaine 0.25% x 1 cc + Fentanyl 20 mcg, followed by infusion of Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL at 12 cc/hr
Other Names:
  • labor analgesia
  • combined spinal-epidural
Active Comparator: Traditional Epidural
Subjects assigned to this group will receive "traditional epidural" to relieve pain during labor. For the traditional epidural, subjects receive a small amount of a local anesthetic and a small amount of a narcotic pain killer into the epidural space, followed by a small amount of both of these medications that is continuously infused into the epidural space through a catheter that is left in place. The traditional epidural is not experimental.
Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL x 15 cc, followed by infusion of Bupivacaine 0.0625% with Fentanyl 2 mcg/mL at 12 cc/hr
Other Names:
  • labor analgesia
  • traditional epidural

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse fetal effects: fetal bradycardia and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns
Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Average change in systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
Average change in mean blood pressure
Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
Blood pressure differences between the upper and lower extremities
Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
Efficacy of analgesia as rated by the visual analog pain scale
Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after analgesic placement
during the 60 minutes after analgesic placement
Pruritus
Time Frame: through the first day following placement of analgesia
through the first day following placement of analgesia
Incidence of hypotension
Time Frame: during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
during the 60 minutes after placement of analgesia
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: first day following placement of analgesia
first day following placement of analgesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel W. Skupski, M.D., Obstetrics & Gynecology; Weill Medical College of Cornell - New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Klaus Kjaer-Pedersen, M.D., Anesthesiology; Weill Medical College of Cornell - New York Presbyterian Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2008

Last Verified

March 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labour Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine and Fentanyl (for CSE)

3
Subscribe