Depression-Diabetes Mechanisms: Urban African Americans

July 27, 2015 updated by: Dominique Musselman, Emory University
African-Americans suffer from increased prevalence of both type 2 diabetes and diabetes complications, reflecting a combination of psychobehavioral factors as well as metabolic dysfunction. In this process, depression may contribute to both the genesis of type 2 diabetes (through impact on neurohormonal activation, inflammatory mediators, and insulin resistance), and difficulties in management (through decreased adherence to diet plans, medication, and scheduled appointments). The preliminary data from the Grady Diabetes Clinic indicates that depression may be common in African-Americans with diabetes, that depression is a factor in non-adherence, and that non-adherence leads to poor glycemic control - a direct cause of diabetes complications. What is not known is: how treatment of depression could lead to both neurohormonal and psychobiological improvement, with improved patient adherence and glycemic control.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To determine the psychobehavioral and neurohormonal mechanisms of effective treatment, the investigator will conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with major depression, who will receive either: (i) computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program entitled "Beating the Blues" + placebo, or (ii) computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program entitled "Beating the Blues" + the SSRI antidepressant escitalopram. The investigator will assess (a) glycemic control (levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)), in relation to (b) adherence (keeping scheduled return appointments, diet, exercise, and glucose monitoring), (c) depressive symptoms (neurocognitive and neurobehavioral symptoms determined by self- and observer-rated scales), and (d) the four pathways of neurometabolic function.

Study visits will occur once a month for 6 months. Should patients report severe environmental stressors (such as marital conflict, loss of family member or job, being exposed to trauma), patients will be offered an intensification of their contact with study personnel, e.g. weekly contact by phone or "in-person" visits to see study personnel at the Grady Diabetes Clinic.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
        • Grady Hospital Diabetes Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be English-speaking
  • African American
  • Have type 2 diabetes per American Diabetes Association criteria
  • Patient's receiving care at Grady Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severely depressed (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) ≥ 34
  • Non - English speaking
  • Women who are pregnant, women who will be breastfeeding during the study, and women of childbearing potential who are not practicing a reliable method of birth control.
  • currently meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria for:

    1. Bipolar Disorder
    2. Schizophrenia or any Psychotic Disorder
    3. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
    4. Mental Retardation or any Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Cognitive Disorder.
    5. Personality Disorder of sufficient severity to interfere with their participation in the study
    6. Psychotic features or with history of Psychotic Disorder, as defined by DSM-IV
  • Suicide risk, or have made serious suicide attempt in the past year
  • Substance Abuse or Dependence (other than nicotine) during the six months preceding the first dose of double blind study medication
  • Any malignancy (other than excised basal cell carcinoma), or any clinically significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular (including any rhythm disorder), renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, or neurological disease. History of syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone secretion.
  • Diabetes due to: glucagonoma, pheochromocytoma or other endocrine neoplasm, drug induced diabetes, gestational diabetes, or those with established genetic defects of beta cell function.
  • Medical conditions that will interfere with the HbA1c assay or if hospitalization is likely within two months (sickle cell anemia, hypersplenism)
  • A history of diabetic ketoacidosis episode during the 6 months preceding the first dose of double-blind study medication.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes as judged by the investigator defined as blood glucose greater than 400 on last two visits or patients whom suffered from diabetic ketoacidosis in the last month or have had 2 episodes in the last year.
  • Autonomic or peripheral neuropathy that requires treatment
  • At the first follow-up visit - Patients with systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mm Hg or less than 90 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 105 mm Hg or less than 50 mm Hg
  • Treatment with a depot neuroleptic during the last 6 months
  • Patients who have been treated with any neuroleptic, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication
  • Participation in an investigational drug study within 1 month prior to study entry or who have received treatment with an investigational drug within 1 month or five half-lives, whichever is longer.
  • Previous investigational study of escitalopram or previously treated with escitalopram in a dose and duration sufficient for therapeutic trial.
  • History of hypersensitivity reaction to escitalopram or citalopram.
  • Electroconvulsive therapy during the past 3 months
  • Initiation or termination of behavior therapy or psychotherapy in the 3 months.
  • Positive urine screening for alcohol, illicit drugs, or any prohibited medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Beating the Blues CBT + Escitalopram
Subjects with type 2 diabetes will be randomized to Beating the Blues (computerized cognitive behavioral therapy) with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant, escitalopram (10 mg taken orally once or twice daily) for 6 months
Beating the Blues is a computerized cognitive behavioral therapy.
Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant. It's a 10 mg pill taken once or twice daily for 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Lexapro
Active Comparator: Beating the Blues CBT + Placebo
Subjects with type 2 diabetes will be randomized to Beating the Blues (computerized cognitive behavioral therapy) with placebo (taken orally one to two tablets daily) for 6 months
Beating the Blues is a computerized cognitive behavioral therapy.
A sugar pill taken as one to two tablets daily for 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response of Participants, Defined by Change in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24

The 21-item HDRS measures depression severity. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptoms not present) to a maximum of 2 to 4 (symptom extremely severe) for a total score range of 0 to 60, where higher scores indicate greater severity. The HDRS at week 24 was compared to the baseline HDRS and each participant's response was calculated using the below table:

No Response = < 25% change in Depression Rating Scale Score Partial Responder =< 50% to >25% change in Depression Rating Scale Score Responder = 50% or greater change in Depression Rating Scale Score

Baseline, week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dominique L Musselman, MD, MS, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Beating the Blues

3
Subscribe