Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Comparative Study of Tigecycline vs Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole for the Treatment of Hospitalized Subjects With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection

This is a study of the safety and efficacy of tigecycline to ceftriaxone sodium plus metronidazole in hospitalized subjects with cIAI. Subjects will be followed for efficacy through the test-of-cure assessment. Safety evaluations will occur through the treatment and post-treatment periods and continue through resolution or stability of the adverse event(s).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

473

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairns, Australia, QLD 4870
      • Parkville, Australia, Vic 3050
    • Queensland
      • Nambour, Queensland, Australia, 4560
      • Shanghai, China, 200032
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
      • Lahti, Finland, 15850
      • Seinajoki, Finland, 60220
      • Tampere, Finland, 33101
      • Marseille, France, 13 009
      • Nimes, France, 30 029
      • Pierre Benite, France, 69495
      • Saint Denis, France, 93205
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04129
      • Luebeck, Germany, 23538
      • Muenster, Germany, 48149
      • Tuebingen, Germany, 72056
      • Athens, Greece, 11527
      • Athens, Greece, 12462
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54623
      • New Territories, Hong Kong
      • Pokfulam, Hong Kong
      • Bhopal, India, 462 038
      • Lucknow, India, 226 014
      • Mumbai, India, 400071
      • New Delhi, India, 110060
    • Andhra
      • Hyderabad, Andhra, India, 500 082
      • Brescia, Italy, 25123
      • Genova, Italy, 16132
      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
      • Rome, Italy, 00168
      • Udine, Italy, 33100
      • Vicenza, Italy, 36100
      • Manila, Philippines, 1000
      • Quezon City, Philippines, 1100
      • Quezon City, Philippines, 1105
      • Almada, Portugal, 2801-951
      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
      • Porto, Portugal, 4099-100
      • Porto, Portugal, 4200-319
      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
      • Bellville, South Africa, 7530
      • Kuilsriver, South Africa, 7580
      • Parow, South Africa, 7505
      • Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 3201
      • Pretoria, South Africa, 001
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
      • Bilbao, Spain, 48903
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
      • Madrid, Spain, 28905
      • Murcia, Spain, 30120
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1211
      • Lugano, Switzerland, 6900
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
      • Changhua, Taiwan, 500
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 404
      • Tainan, Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
      • Tao-yuan, Taiwan, 333
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34718
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
      • Wigan, United Kingdom, WN1 2NN
    • Cheshire
      • Stockport, Cheshire, United Kingdom, SK2 7JE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of complicated intra-abdominal infection that requires surgery within 24 hours.
  • Fever plus other symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer
  • Medicines that suppress the immune system
  • Dialysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A
every 12 hours IV (an initial dose of 100 mg followed by 50 mg every 12 hours)
Active Comparator: B
Ceftriaxone sodium 2 g once daily intravenously plus metronidazole 1 g to 2 g daily given in divided doses intravenously. Test article should be administered for a minimum of 4 days and up to 14 days at the discretion of the investigator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Clinically Evaluable (CE) Patients With Clinical Response of Cure at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
CE population were those who completed TOC assessment of cure or failure (but not indeterminate) or, in case of premature discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, had completed end of treatment assessment such that assessment of clinical response could be made. Clinical response was assigned by investigator per protocol-specified guidelines and defined as: test article and initial intervention (operative and/or radiologically controlled drainage procedure) resolved the intra-abdominal infection. TOC performed 10-28 days after last dose of study drug.
up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Patients With a Clinical Response of Cure at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
ME population were subjects who were clinically evaluable and had baseline culture with at least 1 identified isolate that was susceptible to study drug and comparator. The clinical response was assigned by the investigator according to the protocol-specified guidelines. A clinical response of cure was defined as: the test article and the initial intervention (operative and/or radiologically controlled drainage procedure) resolved the intra-abdominal infection.
up to 6 weeks
Number of Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Patients by Microbiological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
Microbiological response was assessed at patient level was the combined responses for all baseline isolates identified in intra-abdominal and blood cultures. Eradication=baseline isolate not recovered from primary infection site/blood; Presumed Eradication=No sample for culture, clinical response was cure; Persistence=baseline isolate recovered from primary infection site/blood; Presumed Persistence=No sample available for culture, clinical response was failure; Superinfection=culture from primary infection site with new isolate not identified at baseline, clinical response was failure.
up to 6 weeks
Number of Days of Inpatient Healthcare Resource Utilization on or Before Test-of-Cure
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
Healthcare resource utilization assessment included days of overall inpatient hospitalization, days of primary inpatient hospitalization, days of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) treatment and days of non-ICU inpatient hospitalization
up to 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Spain, infomed@wyeth.com
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Australia, China, Hong Kong, medinfo@wyeth.com
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Denmark, Finland, MedInfoNord@wyeth.com
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For South Africa, ZAFinfo@wyeth.com
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Italy, Greece, decresg@wyeth.com
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Switzerland, med@wyeth.com
  • Principal Investigator: Trial Manager, For Turkey, Erisc@wyeth.com

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 3, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on tigecycline

3
Subscribe