Effectiveness of Public Health Model of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Control for High-Risk Adolescents

June 24, 2014 updated by: Melbourne Hovell, San Diego State University

Promoting Adherence to TB Regimens in High Risk Youth

This study will determine the differential cumulative mean number of isoniazid (INH) pills completed over 9 to 12 months for adolescents assigned to one of the following two groups: 1) peer adherence coaching, parent training, and self-esteem/life skills counseling; or 2) self-esteem/life skills counseling alone. The study will also estimate the costs and cost effectiveness of peer adherence coaching versus control procedures; this will be done from a provider and societal perspective.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

Tuberculosis (TB) was responsible for almost one billion deaths in the 20th century. It is epidemic in the developing world and immigrants introduce TB to developed nations. TB control requires treatment for latent TB infection (LTBI) and active disease, as well as adherence to medical regimens. This study will determine the effectiveness of a public health model of LTBI control among high-risk adolescents. The integration of behavioral science, medical services, parent instruction, and assistance from schools and clinics (coordinated by the county health department) is based on recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The effectiveness of this system is dependent, in part, on patient adherence.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The primary outcome of this study is adherence to an INH treatment regimen. For a given participant, adherence is assessed every 30 days, with the final outcome determined 12 months after treatment start date. Adherence is assessed using participant recall, urine testing for INH metabolites, pill counts, and medication event monitoring system (MEMS) caps.

The key secondary outcomes are parent knowledge and practice of intervention support procedures, parent knowledge of TB, self-esteem effects and life skills acquisition, cost and cost effectiveness of the intervention, and knowledge and practice of LTBI care by providers at participating community clinics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

263

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • San Diego State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PPD positive
  • San Diego County residents (without plans to relocate out of the county in the 12 months after study entry)
  • Able to respond to the interview questions in English or Spanish
  • Eligible for INH treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving treatment in Mexico (due to differing medications and length of treatment)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Peer medication adherence counseling
14 counseling sessions focusing on INH adherence conducted over 6 months, starting once per week and decreasing in frequency to once a month.
Active Comparator: 2
Peer life skills counseling
Peer counseling session covering life skills (e.g., communication skills, goal setting, self-esteem) training, 14 sessions over 6 months beginning once per week and decreasing in frequency over time to once per month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of INH pills taken
Time Frame: 12 months
30-day recall of INH consumption measured monthly for up to 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Melbourne Hovell, San Diego State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 5, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe