The Diabetes TeleCare Study (DTC)

Bridging Barriers to Diabetes Care With Telemedicine: The Diabetes TeleCare Study (DTC)

The American Diabetes Association clinical care guidelines stress the importance of metabolic control to prevent complications and improve quality of life for persons with diabetes. Unfortunately, these guidelines have not had widespread acceptance into clinical practice. Therefore, we propose translational research to evaluate telemedicine technology using interactive video conferencing (Diabetes TeleCare) as a novel means to increase the availability of health professionals in rural communities for the effective delivery of a diabetes self-management education program and as a means to provide retinal screenings in the primary care setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

According to recent 2002 estimates, the yearly cost of diabetes was approximately $132 billion. The burden of diabetes is considerable, particularly for ethnically diverse populations. Disease management programs that focus on self-management education have been effective in improving metabolic control. Accordingly, the American Diabetes Association clinical care guidelines stress the importance of metabolic control to prevent complications and improve quality of life for persons with this disease. Unfortunately, these advances have not resulted in widespread acceptance into clinical practice. Therefore, we propose translational research to evaluate telemedicine technology using interactive video conferencing (Diabetes TeleCare) as a novel means to increase the availability of health professionals in rural communities for the effective delivery of a diabetes self-management education program and as a means to provide retinal screenings in the primary care setting. Our aims are to 1) develop and implement a 12-month intervention, Diabetes TeleCare to improve adherence to diabetes clinical care guidelines and improve diabetes control in two community health centers located in ethnically diverse, rural and medically underserved communities, 2) conduct a one-year randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 200 patients to formally evaluate the effectiveness of Diabetes TeleCare compared to Usual Care in a sample with >60% African-Americans, and 3) determine the cost-effectiveness and satisfaction of Diabetes TeleCare compared to Usual Care. Participants are recruited from two community health centers in rural South Carolina and randomized according to a patient randomization schedule. Diabetes TeleCare (a structured curriculum) is delivered by a team consisting of a registered nurse/certified diabetes educator (RN-CDE) and an experienced registered dietitian, with support by other health professionals who are linked by interactive video conferencing to participants (single and group) in rural health centers at distant locations. The primary outcomes are measures of metabolic control (A1c, lipids), blood pressure, and use of the telemedicine-facilitated retinal screening capacity. Secondary outcomes include satisfaction, quality of life, health beliefs, and knowledge. The economic analysis will include an assessment of resource utilization, cost, and health utilities. In addition, incremental reductions in costs per A1c and the estimated lifetime cost-utility of Diabetes TeleCare compared to usual care will be determined. Telemedicine may be an effective alternative to traditional health care delivery systems resulting in improved diabetes education and control.

The intervention goal was to achieve an A1c <7%, with secondary goals of 10% weight loss and increasing exercise to at least 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week. Participants attend 13 sessions, 2 in the first month (1 group, 1 individual), monthly thereafter (9 group, 2 individual). Three group sessions were conducted in-person, all others were conducted via telemedicine. The self-management education team consisted of an RN/CDE and an RD. Sessions were conducted remotely, with a trained facilitator (LPN) at the clinic site. Participants were given a notebook and new material was added at each session. Completion of self-monitoring logs, including blood sugar, diet and physical activity, was assigned daily followed by less frequently based on progress towards intervention goals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

165

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Bennettsville, South Carolina, United States, 29512
        • CareSouth Bennettsville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All participants must have a confirmed physician diagnosis of type 2 diabetes supported by American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria for blood glucose levels or
  • Current use of oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin as confirmed by brief medical record review.
  • All adults (> 21 years of age) who have a A1c value > 7.0 will be eligible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria applies to individuals with limitations that could limit safe participation in the study,

    • such as metastatic cancer,
    • multiple or recent (within six months) myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke,
    • dialysis for end stage renal disease,
    • severe psychiatric disease or dementia, or
    • inability to walk without an assistive device.
  • We will also exclude women who are pregnant at the time of study recruitment (based on self report only) because of the unique needs related to diabetes self-management during pregnancy.
  • We will, however, retain women in the study should they become pregnant during the course of the project.
  • Individuals will be excluded if they plan to move out of the area.
  • Additional exclusions may include inability to complete baseline tasks to the satisfaction of the lead interventionist or other more subjective assessment suggesting inability or unwillingness to adhere reasonably to the intervention based on interventionist review.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
A 12-month diabetes self-management intervention delivered via telemedicine, with opportunity to receive telemedicine-based screening eye exam, was conducted.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Upon randomization, received one 15-minute diabetes self-management individual session, using American Diabetes Association materials. Continued care, as usual, from their primary care provider throughout duration of active 12 month intervention period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths
6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths
6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths
LDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: 6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths
6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths
Cost effectiveness and cost utility
Time Frame: 6 mths, 12 mths
6 mths, 12 mths
Retinal examination rates
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Weight
Time Frame: 6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths
6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths
Waist Circumference
Time Frame: 6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths
6 mths, 12 mths, 24 mths

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard M Davis, MD, University of South Carolina

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R18 67312 (completed)
  • R18DK067312 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

3
Subscribe