Nepafenac Opthalmic Suspension 0.1% Compared to Acular LS for Treatment of Inflammation After Cataract Surgery

July 7, 2009 updated by: Alcon Research

Preoperative and Postoperative Nevanac 0.1% Compared to Acular LS for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation Associated With Cataract Surgery

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.1% eye drops to Acular LS eye drops, used before and after cataract surgery, for treating inflammation in the eye.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

267

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Nacogdoches, Texas, United States, 76134
        • Lehmann Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • planned cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 10

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Percentage of patients who are a clinical success at Day 14 postoperative visit (where a "clinical success" is defined as aqueous cells < grade 1 and aqueous flare = grade 0 at the current visit and all subsequent visits).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Percentage of patients who are clinically cured, clinical successes, treatment failure, clinically significant inflammation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Andrew Maxwell, Study Director

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 2, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 8, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2009

Last Verified

July 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe