BEST (Burn Center Evaluation of Standard Therapies) Ventilator Mode Study-

September 8, 2015 updated by: Elsa Coates, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research

BEST (Burn Center Evaluation of Standard Therapies) Ventilator Mode Study: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare High Frequency Pressure Ventilation (HFPV) to conventional mechanical ventilation.

Hypothesis: Patients placed on HFPV will have significantly higher number of ventilator-free days compared to patients placed on a conventional volume mode.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing HFPV to conventional ventilator modes in the support of burn patients with respiratory failure. Burn patients who develop the need for mechanical ventilation present a variety of challenges that call for innovative therapeutic options. Even in the absence of smoke inhalation injury,decreased chest wall compliance from full thickness burns as well as massive fluid requirements are just a few variables that make it difficult to achieve gas exchange goals when attempting to apply conventional lung protective strategies recommended by the ARDS Net investigators.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States, 78234
        • United States Army Institute of Surgical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are deemed to require ventilatory support for more than 24 hours from the time of screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated extubation within 24 hours of screening
  • Patients who are pregnant Patients not expected to survive for more than 24 hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: High Frequency
Provide standard ventilatory support for burn patients utilizing high frequency percussive ventilation
Ventilatory support delivering high frequency percussive ventilation using the Volumetric Diffusive Respirator
Other Names:
  • High Frequency Percussive Ventilation
  • Volumetric Diffusive Respirator
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional
Standard ventilator support for non burned patients utilizing lung protective low tidal volume ventilation
Respiratory support with a conventional mode of ventilation using a conventional ventilator (Draeger Evita XL)
Other Names:
  • Lung Protective Ventilation
  • Low Tidal Volume Strategy
  • Conventional Mechanical Ventilation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ventilator-free Days During the First 28 Days
Time Frame: 28 days
The primary end point was ventilator-free days in the first 28 days, defined as the number of days after randomization from day 0 to day 28 alive without ventilator assistance for at least 48 consecutive hrs.
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days Free From Nonpulmonary Organ Failure
Time Frame: 28
days free from nonpulmonary organ failure as adapted from the ARDSnet study in the first 28 days.
28
Death
Time Frame: during hospitalization
In-hospital death.
during hospitalization
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Time Frame: 28 days
Those who develop both clinical and microscopic evidence of pulmonary infection while on the ventilator.
28 days
Need for Rescue Ventilator
Time Frame: 28 days
Subjects who did not meet predetermined oxygenation and ventilation goals on the study mode despite ventilator- specific optimization were switched to a rescue mode of ventilation.
28 days
Barotrauma
Time Frame: 28 days
Defined as a new pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, interstitial emphysema, or pneumatocele >2 cm in diameter not associated with a vascular procedure, lung biopsy, or thoracentesis.
28 days
Ventilator Associated Tracheobronchitis (VATB)
Time Frame: checked daily
Defined as carinal or mainstem airway friability and sloughing with associated bleeding. Only diagnosed after the patient had spent at least 7 days on the assigned ventilator mode and had not been diagnosed with inhalation injury on admission
checked daily

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin K Chung, MD, United States Army Insitute of Surgical Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 13, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 21, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-06-005

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Clinical Trials on Ventilation - High Frequency Percussive Ventilation

3
Subscribe