Comparison of Occupational Therapy and Home Exercises for Adults With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures

June 1, 2012 updated by: David C. Ring, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Occupational Therapy vs Home Exercises After Volar Plate Fixation of a Fracture of the Distal Radius

The purpose of this study is to compare to ways of rehabilitating after surgery for distal radius fractures treated operatively with a volar plate.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Operative treatment of distal radius fractures has become commonplace over the last three decades as our understanding of the relationship between the alignment of the distal radius and the function of the wrist and forearm has improved. Over the last 15 years there has been a trend towards more invasive, internal plate fixation of fractures of the distal radius. One argument in favor of internal fixation for these fractures is that it would be beneficial to allow early movement of the wrist articulation in an attempt to maximize final outcome. There is a difference in opinion among physicians on the importance of supervision of exercises in the recovery process. Some physicians advocate formal occupational therapy while other physicians believe that appropriate instructions for home exercises are just as good. A common belief is that the motivation of the patient plays an important part in recovery. In addition, Psychological and personality factors, such as pain anxiety, catastrophizing, and depression are strongly related to upper extremity specific health status and may also influence recovery. The goal of this study is to determine which protocol for exercises leads to better outcome in patients treated for distal radius with a volar plate. As a secondary goal and to generate hypotheses for later studies we would like to evaluate the influence of psychosocial factors on both objective (motion, grip strength) and subjective (DASH questionnaire) measures of functional recovery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or greater.
  • Isolated distal radial fracture.
  • Fracture treated with volar plates, stable fixation.
  • Initial treatment within 4 weeks of trauma.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complex fractures that require additional or different material than volar plates.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Independent Home Exercises
Subjects who learn their therapy exercises from the surgeon and practice them independently at home.
Subjects provided with wrist splint and instructions for independent exercises to perform at home on their own. Subjects were advised to perform exercises as often as possible, but at least three to four times a day for a minimum of thirty minutes. There was no formal strengthening program.
Experimental: Formal Therapy
Subjects who follow the conventional protocol of seeing a therapist to learn and guide them in their exercises.
Subjects were prescribed formal occupational therapy with supervised exercises to regain digit, wrist, and forearm motion and to strengthen the hand. The content, frequency, and duration of the rehabilitation program were at the discretion of the treating hand therapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of Motion in Degrees of the Wrists
Time Frame: 6 months

Mean arc of wrist flexion and extension six months after surgery.

Normal/expected range of motion for arc of wrist flexion and extension is approximately 160 degrees.

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months

The DASH questionnaire measures arm-specific perceived disability. It contains 30 items and is scaled between zero and 100 with higher scores indicating worse upper-extremity function.

Mean and standard deviations are identical for both arms.

6 months
10-point Ordinal Pain Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
A ten point scale for pain at rest, with 0 as no pain and 10 as worst pain ever.
6 months
Pinch Strength
Time Frame: 6 months

Pinch strength measured with the B&L pinch gauge.

B&L Engineering is the official name of the company (nowhere is there an expansion of this acronym).

6 months
Gartland and Werley Score
Time Frame: 6 months
An objective evaluation of wrist function with 0 to 2 as excellent, 3-8 as good, 9-20 as fair, and 21 and above as poor range of motion.
6 months
Mayo Wrist Score
Time Frame: 6 months
A composite score based on pain intensity, range of motion, grip strength, and functional status. The scale is as follows: below 60 is poor, 60-80 is satisfactory, 80-90 is good, and 90-100 is excellent.
6 months
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured with use of a grip meter as the average of three attempts.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fractures

Clinical Trials on Independent Excercises

3
Subscribe