Effectiveness of Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises in Distal Radius Fracture

April 2, 2025 updated by: burak menek

The Effectiveness of Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises in Individuals With a Distal Radius Fracture

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of closed kinetic chain exercises during the physiotherapy and rehabilitation process following the healing of a distal radius fracture.

A total of 40 participants aged 40-60 years who were diagnosed with distal radius fractures were randomly assigned to two groups: the conventional physiotherapy (CP) group (n=20) and the closed kinetic chain exercise (CKCE) group (n=20). Participants in the CP group underwent a 6-week standard rehabilitation program consisting of conventional physiotherapy sessions conducted 5 days a week. This program included Ultrasound (US), Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), wrist joint range of motion exercises, stretching exercises, Digiflex, Powerweb, and dumbbell-based strengthening exercises. In the CKCE group, the same CP program was implemented with the addition of CKCE sessions conducted five days a week for 6 weeks.

Outcome measures included joint range of motion assessed using the Goniometer Pro mobile application, functionality evaluated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and joint position sense assessed through the Active Repositioning Test.

CKCE may positively affect joint range of motion, arm functionality, pain, and joint position sense by improving the proprioceptive mechanism in individuals with distal radius fractures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of closed kinetic chain exercises during the physiotherapy and rehabilitation process following the healing of a distal radius fracture.

Voluntary consent forms were signed by individuals willing to participate in the study, and their demographic information was recorded. A total of 40 participants were included in the study and divided into two groups:

Group 1: Conventional Physiotherapy Group (n=20) Group 2: Closed Kinetic Chain Exercise Group (n=20) Participants in the first group underwent conventional physiotherapy interventions for 6 weeks, 5 days per week. These interventions included Ultrasound (US), Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), wrist joint range of motion exercises, stretching exercises, and strengthening exercises using Digiflex, Powerweb, and dumbbells. The number of repetitions and sets of the exercises was adjusted based on the patients' conditions, following a progressive approach.

US was applied to the affected wrist for a total of 30 sessions, 5 days a week, once daily, for 6 minutes at an intensity of 1.5 W/cm², using an underwater application method. TENS was administered at a frequency of 100 Hertz for 20 minutes. All participants received manual stretching exercises for wrist flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, supination, and pronation. These stretches were performed by a physiotherapist, with 5 repetitions in each direction, holding the end position for 20 seconds.

Participants in the second group received a treatment protocol including closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) in addition to conventional physiotherapy interventions. As part of the CKCE program, the following exercises were performed with 15 repetitions each:

While the elbow was in extension and the shoulder was at 90° flexion, a ball was stabilized between the hand and the wall. The ball was rolled up and down as well as side-to-side.

While the elbow was in extension and the shoulder was at 90° abduction, a ball was stabilized between the hand and the wall. The ball was rolled up and down as well as side-to-side.

While the elbow was in extension and the shoulder was at 90° flexion, participants were asked to push against the wall by transferring body weight from the shoulder to the elbow and wrist. They held this position for 6 seconds.

Randomization:

The study included 40 participants aged between 40-60 years who were diagnosed with distal radius fractures. A computer-based randomization program was used to assign participants to groups. The randomization codes were sealed in envelopes, which were opened by the physiotherapist administering the exercises on the day of the intervention.

Outcome Measures:

Outcome measures included joint range of motion assessed using the Goniometer Pro mobile application, functionality evaluated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and joint position sense assessed through the Active Repositioning Test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beykoz
      • Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey, 34815
        • Burak Menek

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 40-60 years
  • Diagnosed with a distal radius fracture
  • Applied to Medipol hospitals after the injury and volunteered to participate in the study
  • Patients with good cooperation levels will be included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having bilateral distal radius fractures
  • Having ulna styloid fractures
  • Having other orthopedic, neurological, or rheumatological problems involving the ipsilateral upper extremity
  • A history of surgery involving the ipsilateral upper extremity
  • Associated injuries such as arterial, nerve, or tendon injuries
  • Patients without adequate cooperation will be excluded from the study

Withdrawal Criteria:

  • Missing at least one follow-up
  • Development of orthopedic or systemic problems unrelated to the trauma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional physiotherapy (CP) group
Participants in the first group underwent conventional physiotherapy interventions for 6 weeks, 5 days per week.

Participants in the first group underwent conventional physiotherapy interventions for 6 weeks, 5 days per week. These interventions included Ultrasound (US), Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), wrist joint range of motion exercises, stretching exercises, and strengthening exercises using Digiflex, Powerweb, and dumbbells. The number of repetitions and sets of the exercises was adjusted based on the patients' conditions, following a progressive approach.

US was applied to the affected wrist for a total of 30 sessions, 5 days a week, once daily, for 6 minutes at an intensity of 1.5 W/cm², using an underwater application method. TENS was administered at a frequency of 100 Hertz for 20 minutes. All participants received manual stretching exercises for wrist flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, supination, and pronation. These stretches were performed by a physiotherapist, with 5 repetitions in each direction, holding the end position for 20 seconds.

Experimental: closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) group
Participants in the second group received a treatment protocol including closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) in addition to conventional physiotherapy interventions.

Participants in the first group underwent conventional physiotherapy interventions for 6 weeks, 5 days per week. These interventions included Ultrasound (US), Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), wrist joint range of motion exercises, stretching exercises, and strengthening exercises using Digiflex, Powerweb, and dumbbells. The number of repetitions and sets of the exercises was adjusted based on the patients' conditions, following a progressive approach.

US was applied to the affected wrist for a total of 30 sessions, 5 days a week, once daily, for 6 minutes at an intensity of 1.5 W/cm², using an underwater application method. TENS was administered at a frequency of 100 Hertz for 20 minutes. All participants received manual stretching exercises for wrist flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, supination, and pronation. These stretches were performed by a physiotherapist, with 5 repetitions in each direction, holding the end position for 20 seconds.

Participants in the second group received a treatment protocol that included closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) in addition to conventional physiotherapy. CKCE exercises were performed with 15 repetitions each and involved stabilizing a ball between the hand and the wall in different arm positions, rolling it in multiple directions. Participants also performed weight-shifting exercises against a wall and on a table, holding positions for 6 seconds. Additionally, in a crawling position, they moved their unaffected arm diagonally on both a firm surface and a cushion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
JPS testing
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Joint position sense (JPS) testing was conducted using a standardized protocol with a goniometer for active wrist position measurement. Participants, seated with their elbow flexed on a table, had their wrist passively moved to 30º extension to memorize the position. With vision occluded, they moved their wrist to full flexion and attempted to reproduce the 30º extension. The reproduced wrist position was recorded, and the difference from the reference angle determined the JPS deficit. A zero value indicated perfect reproduction, while absolute differences reflected the deficit's magnitude. Two trials' mean values were used for analysis.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Goniometric Measurement
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
In this study, the affected shoulder's flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation angles will be measured using a goniometer-pro application. Reference values will include 0-180 degrees for flexion and abduction, 45 degrees for extension, and 0-90 degrees for internal and external rotation
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a commonly used tool in clinical settings for assessing pain intensity. Participants rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents unbearable pain. Pain intensity at rest and during activity will be evaluated using the VAS for participants before and after the treatment
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
The DASH questionnaire, introduced in collaboration with the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons and other organizations, evaluates physical limitations and functionality in upper extremity problems (10). The DASH consists of three subsections. The first section includes 30 questions: 21 assess difficulties in daily living activities, 5 evaluate symptoms, and 4 measure social function, work, sleep, and self-confidence. An optional module (Work Module (DASH-W)) with 4 additional questions assesses the impact on work life
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 9, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fractures

Clinical Trials on Conventional Physiotherapy

Subscribe