Efficacy and Safety of Nilotinib (AMN107) Compared With Current Treatment Options in Patients With GIST Who Have Failed Both Imatinib and Sunitinib (ENEST)

June 5, 2012 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nilotinib Versus Best Supportive Care With or Without a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Investigator's Choice) in Adult Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Resistant to Both Imatinib and Sunitinib

The study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nilotinib versus current treatment in adults with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who have either progressed or who were intolerant to the first and second line treatments.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

248

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia, 4066
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Victoria
      • East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3002
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Vienna, Austria
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Toronto, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Praha 5, Czech Republic
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bordeaux, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lyon, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Marseille, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Duesseldorf, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Essen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Koln, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mannheim, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muenchen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tubingen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bologna, Italy
        • Novrtis Investigative Site
      • Milan, Italy
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leiden, Netherlands
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chur, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010-2965
        • Washington Hospital Center - Washington Cancer Institute
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Wayne State University/Wertz Clinical Cancer Center
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine - Siteman Cancer Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10011
        • St. Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157-1082
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111-2497
        • Fox Chase Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-4009
        • University of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria (Core Phase):

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Radiological confirmation of disease progression during imatinib and sunitinib therapy OR intolerance to imatinib and/or sunitinib
  • At least one measurable site of disease on CT/MRI scan
  • Physically fit even if not able to work
  • Normal organ, electrolyte, and bone marrow function

Inclusion criteria (Extension Phase):

  • Patients whose tumors had progressed on the control arm and had crossed over to the nilotinib arm.
  • The study was stopped due to meeting the primary efficacy endpoint of PFS at the interim analysis.
  • Patients who were still being treated at the close of the Core study on the control arm or nilotinib arm (whose tumors have not progressed at the time of the end of the Core study).
  • Patients must have had documented, confirmed stable, partial or complete response as defined by the RECIST criteria at the time of entry into the Extension study with the exception of patients who had progressed on the control arm.

Exclusion criteria (Core Phase):

  • Previous treatment with nilotinib or any other drug in this class or other targeted therapy
  • Treatment with any cytotoxic and/or investigational cytotoxic drug ≤ 4 weeks prior to study entry
  • Impaired cardiac function
  • Use of coumarin derivatives (i.e. warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon)
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating

Exclusion criteria (Extension Phase):

  • Use of other anticancer treatments or investigational drugs (with exception of the study drugs)
  • Patients with a history of noncompliance with study drug treatment in the Core study protocol.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria applied

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nilotinib
400mg twice daily in core and extension phases of the study.
Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (bid)
Other Names:
  • AMN107, Tasigna®
Active Comparator: Control/cross-over to Nilotinib

In core study phase, patients in this arm received Best Supportive Care (BSC) with or without imatinib or sunitinib at the last tolerated dose or at the investigator's choice until documented disease progression followed by cross-over to nilotinib arm.

Patients entering the extension study on this control arm were permitted to cross over to nilotinib arm only upon documented disease progression.

Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (bid)
Other Names:
  • AMN107, Tasigna®
Can include pain medication, localized radiotherapy, nutritional support, and/or oxygen therapy and blood transfusions. Imatinib or sunitinib can be administered at the last tolerated dose and regimen or at the Investigator's choice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)
Time Frame: Up to 16 months
Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a participant has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the time of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression is defined according to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST) criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Up to 16 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
PFS is defined as the time from the first date of cross-over to nilotinib therapy from the control arm to the date of the first observation of documented disease progression. Tumor assessment was based on the local investigator's measurement using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST) criteria. Progression is defined according to modified RECIST criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Up to 34 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off:June, 2008)
Time Frame: Up to 16 months
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a participant is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact.
Up to 16 months
Overall Survival During Core and Extension Phases of the Study
Time Frame: Up to 50 months (including core, extension and follow up period)
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a participant is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact. This analysis included both Core and Extension data as well as survival follow up data.
Up to 50 months (including core, extension and follow up period)
Overall Survival for Treatment Crossover Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
For patients who crossed-over to nilotinib from the control arm, the overall survival was the time from the first dose date of nilotinib after switching from control arm to the date of death due to any cause. If death was not observed, the OS was censored at the latest date the patient was known to be alive.
Up to 34 months
Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Central Radiology Review During Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)
Time Frame: Up to 16 months
The best overall response is the best response recorded from randomization until disease progression. The CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Using modified RECIST criteria, a Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all lesions, and a Partial Response is defined as either 1) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no new lesions or progression of non-target lesions or 2) disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s).
Up to 16 months
Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
The best overall response (CR/PR) must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Using modified RECIST criteria, a Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all lesions, and a Partial Response is defined as either 1) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no new lesions or progression of non-target lesions or 2) disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s).
Up to 34 months
Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)
Time Frame: Up to 16 months
The overall clinical benefit includes the best overall responses of CR, PR, or SD. The best overall responses of CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. The best overall response of SD must have at least one SD (or better) at least 6 weeks (or 6 months or 12 months as applicable) after randomization but before progression.
Up to 16 months
Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 34 months
The overall clinical benefit includes the best overall responses of CR, PR, or SD. The best overall responses of CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. The best overall response of SD must have at least one SD (or better) at least 6 weeks (or 6 months or 12 months as applicable) after randomization but before progression.
Up to 34 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Clinical Trials on Nilotinib

3
Subscribe