Pilot Study: Does Chiropractic Care Decrease Fall Risk in Older Adults

April 16, 2010 updated by: Cleveland Chiropractic College

Pilot Study: Does Chiropractic Care Decrease Fall Risk in Older Adults?

The purpose is to study the effect of chiropractic care on balance in older adults.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The specific aims of this pilot study are to: 1) build a recruitment pool of older adults within the local community; 2) establish a protocol for long-term surveillance of falls for older adult chiropractic patients; 3) explore dose-response patterns to chiropractic care by comparing Berg Balance Scale scores at 12 months from baseline in three groups of older adults with impaired balance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64131
        • Cleveland Chiropractic College Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 65 or older
  2. Able to stand steadily without assistance on one leg for an average of <5 seconds (determined by averaging the time for both legs)
  3. Able to attend all scheduled sessions (by self-report)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-ambulatory (wheelchair-bound); this precludes required balance testing; however, volunteers requiring assistive devices such as canes and walkers are not excluded
  2. received chiropractic care or other manual care within the past three months (by self-report)
  3. initiated exercise program for balance / lower body strength within the past month (by self-report)
  4. contraindications to SMT or mild-exertion exercise, as determined by the clinician through physical exam and x-rays (if indicated). Contraindications include but are not limited to: signs and symptoms associated with vertebrobasilar insufficiency (including facial numbness, diplopia, drop attacks, dysphagia, and ataxia which are not fatiguable or habituable with repeated provocative head positioning); unstable or severe medical condition; severe osteoporosis, fracture or other osseous abnormalities; "high cardiovascular risk", i.e. persons with known severe cardiovascular, pulmonary or metabolic disease, or one or more major signs/symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular and pulmonary disease
  5. absence of indications for SMT, as determined by the clinician through history, physical exam, orthopedic tests, and static and motion palpation. Indications for SMT include identification of decreased or increased spinal joint mobility usually accompanied by tenderness and muscle tension and spasm;
  6. unable to understand English adequately to complete study forms and questionnaires, because we do not have study personnel fluent in other languages;
  7. central causes of vertigo, including arteriovenous malformations, cerebral hemorrhage, brainstem vascular disease, tumors and demyelenating diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean change scores for the BBS from baseline to 8 weeks will be compared with a one-factor analysis of variance. Post-hoc comparisons of means and associated confidence intervals will be evaluated using the Tukey test.
Time Frame: Through December 2008
Through December 2008

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cheryl Hawk, D.C., Ph.D., Cleveland Chiropractic College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

July 9, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2010

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-07252006
  • FCER 06-10-02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Equilibrium

Clinical Trials on Chiropractic Manipulation

Subscribe