Clinical Study of the U-Plate Fracture Repair System to Treat Rib Fractures

Clinical Evaluation of the U-plate Fracture Repair System for the Fixation of Rib Fractures

The purpose of this study is to gather information about a device used to help fix broken ribs.

Hypothesis: Rib fracture repair with the U-plate system is clinically durable and safe for the indications of flail chest repair, acute pain control, chest wall defect repair, and rib fracture non-union.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Flail Chest; Rib Fracture
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: U-plate fracture repair system

Detailed Description

Rib fractures are a painful and disabling injury commonly found among trauma patients. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, approximately 300,000 people with rib fractures were treated in emergency and ambulatory care departments in the United States in the year 2004. Rib fracture patients are significantly more disabled at 30 days post-injury than patients with chronic medical illness and lose an average of 70 days of work or usual activity during their acute recovery.

The rationale for conducting this study is to demonstrate in a prospective study that the U-plate repair system is durable and safe. Although this clinical outcome data is not required by the FDA to market and implant this prosthesis, the investigators believe that in order for the U-plate to be widely accepted, prospectively collected outcome data are necessary.

With the goal of improving the durability of fixation of rib fractures over the techniques currently available and with the additional goal of developing a minimally invasive technique, a U-shaped plate was developed. The design of the U-plate theoretically overcomes the inherent softness of the human rib by grasping the rib over its superior margin and by securing the plate with anterior to posterior locking screws that do not rely on screw purchase in bone. Thus much of the strength and durability of the fixation is transferred from the relatively soft rib to the plate itself.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 10
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Oregon
    • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
      • Oregon Health & Science University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects must be at least 18 years of age

• Subjects must have one of the four clinical indications listed below:

  1. Flail chest with failure to wean from ventilator (> 5 days post-injury) and Paradoxical chest wall movement visualized; no significant pulmonary contusion and no significant brain injury
  2. Painful, displaced rib fractures (acute pain control) and failure of narcotics or epidural pain catheter to control pain; fracture movement exacerbates pain (after 7 - 10 days) and minimal associated injuries
  3. Chest wall defect/severely displaced fractures and non-repair defect may result in pulmonary hernia and severely displaced fractures are significantly impeding lung expansion in hemi-thorax
  4. Symptomatic rib fracture non-union and CT scan evidence of fracture non-union at least 2 months post-injury

Exclusion Criteria:

• Subjects who are enrolled in another investigational treatment trial
• Subjects who have received an investigational drug or device within 30 days of enrollment
• Subjects who are unable to complete the follow-up questionnaires
• Subjects with severe head injuries or other severe associated injuries
• Subjects who are not expected to survive the follow-up period
• Female subjects who are pregnant
• Non-English or English as Second Language speakers

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
• Allocation: NA
• Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Intervention / Treatment

OTHER: Treatment

Device: U-plate fracture repair system; All subjects meeting inclusion criteria will undergo surgery for the repair of their fractured rib/s using the U-plate device. Subjects will be monitored daily during the entire course of their hospitalization for adverse experiences. Subjects will be contacted by phone to complete the MPQ and SF-36 Health Survey. Subjects will be asked if and when they have returned to work or to their previous level of functioning. Subjects will be asked if they had any complications or problems associated with their surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Adverse Post-op Events Related to the Repair and Plating System	Clinical evaluations or chest radiographs at a minimum of 1 and 6 months	180 days
The Rand 36-Item Health Survey Results - Physical Functioning Scale	The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental health. Study subjects completed the questionnaire at 2 month intervals for 6 months to evaluate net change over time. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using a RAND scoring table. This health survey was developed at Rand Health as part of the Medical Outcomes Study.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The Rand 36-Item Health Survey Results - Role Limitations - Physical Scale	The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental health. Study subjects completed the questionnaire at 2 month intervals for 6 months to evaluate net change over time. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using a RAND scoring table. This health survey was developed at Rand Health as part of the Medical Outcomes Study.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The Rand 36-Item Health Survey Results - Role Limitations - Emotional Scale	The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental health. Study subjects completed the questionnaire at 2 month intervals for 6 months to evaluate net change over time. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using a RAND scoring table. This health survey was developed at Rand Health as part of the Medical Outcomes Study.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The Rand 36-Item Health Survey Results - Vitality Scale	The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental health. Study subjects completed the questionnaire at 2 month intervals for 6 months to evaluate net change over time. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using a RAND scoring table. This health survey was developed at Rand Health as part of the Medical Outcomes Study.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The Rand 36-Item Health Survey Results - Emotional Well-being Scale	The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental health. Study subjects completed the questionnaire at 2 month intervals for 6 months to evaluate net change over time. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using a RAND scoring table. This health survey was developed at Rand Health as part of the Medical Outcomes Study.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The Rand 36-Item Health Survey Results - Social Functioning Scale	The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental health. Study subjects completed the questionnaire at 2 month intervals for 6 months to evaluate net change over time. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using a RAND scoring table. This health survey was developed at Rand Health as part of the Medical Outcomes Study.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The Rand 36-Item Health Survey Results - Bodily Pain Scale	The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental health. Study subjects completed the questionnaire at 2 month intervals for 6 months to evaluate net change over time. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using a RAND scoring table. This health survey was developed at Rand Health as part of the Medical Outcomes Study.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The Rand 36-Item Health Survey Results - General Health Scale	The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental health. Study subjects completed the questionnaire at 2 month intervals for 6 months to evaluate net change over time. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using a RAND scoring table. This health survey was developed at Rand Health as part of the Medical Outcomes Study.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) - Present Pain Intensity (PPI)	The MPQ evaluates subjective pain using word descriptors (PPI, present pain intensity) and an intensity scale (PRI, pain rating index). The rank value for each word descriptor is based on its position in the word set. The sum of the rank values is the pain rating index (PPI). The maximum pain score using word descriptors is 78, with a higher score reflecting greater pain.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) - Pain Rating Index (PRI)	The MPQ evaluates subjective pain using word descriptors (PPI, present pain intensity) and an intensity scale (PRI, pain rating index). The rank value for each word descriptor is based on its position in the word set. The sum of the rank values is the pain rating index (PPI). The maximum pain score using word descriptors is 78, with a higher score reflecting greater pain.	results at 60, 120, and 180 days post-repair with results posted for 180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Oregon Health and Science University
• Collaborators: ACUTE Innovations, LLC
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: John C. Mayberry, MD, Oregon Health and Science University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Cacchione RN, Richardson JD, Seligson D. Painful nonunion of multiple rib fractures managed by operative stabilization. J Trauma. 2000 Feb;48(2):319-21. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200002000-00023. No abstract available.
• Beal SL, Oreskovich MR. Long-term disability associated with flail chest injury. Am J Surg. 1985 Sep;150(3):324-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90071-6.
• Tanaka H, Yukioka T, Yamaguti Y, Shimizu S, Goto H, Matsuda H, Shimazaki S. Surgical stabilization of internal pneumatic stabilization? A prospective randomized study of management of severe flail chest patients. J Trauma. 2002 Apr;52(4):727-32; discussion 732. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200204000-00020.
• Ng AB, Giannoudis PV, Bismil Q, Hinsche AF, Smith RM. Operative stabilisation of painful non-united multiple rib fractures. Injury. 2001 Oct;32(8):637-9. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00017-1. No abstract available.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: November 1, 2006
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): October 1, 2008
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 9, 2007
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 9, 2007
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): November 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE): July 1, 2011
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 7, 2011
• Last Verified: June 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Prosthesis; Implant; Rib Fracture; Flail Chest; Rib Fracture Repair; Rib Fracture ORIF; Chest wall deformity; Rib fracture non-union
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Wounds and Injuries; Thoracic Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Flail Chest; Rib Fractures
• Other Study ID Numbers: IRB 579; eIRB00000579