Radiofrequency Therapy-Induced Endogenous Heat-Shock Proteins With or Without Radiofrequency Ablation or Cryotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage IV Melanoma

October 29, 2018 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Endogenous Heat-shock Vaccines for Melanoma A Feasibility Study

RATIONALE: Radiofrequency therapy and radiofrequency ablation use a high-frequency electric current to kill tumor cells. Radiofrequency therapy can also cause the body to produce heat-shock proteins which may help kill more tumor cells. Cryotherapy kills tumor cells by freezing them. It is not yet known whether heat-shock proteins caused by radiofrequency therapy given together with radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy is more effective in treating stage IV melanoma than radiofrequency therapy-induced heat-shock proteins alone.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying the side effects of radiofrequency therapy-induced endogenous heat-shock proteins when given alone or together with radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy in treating patients with stage IV melanoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Determine the safety and feasibility of endogenous heat-shock protein (hsp)70 synthesis at the site of the tumor using radiofrequency therapy (RFT) in patients with stage IV malignant melanoma.
  • Determine the safety and feasibility of hsp70 release into the circulation using RFT alone vs RFT followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryotherapy in these patients.
  • Determine the feasibility of inducing a primary antitumor immune response using RFT with or without additional local therapy (i.e., RFA or cryotherapy) in these patients.
  • Gain preliminary insight into the antitumor efficacy of an in vivo heat shock vaccine in these patients.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.

  • Arm I (closed to enrollment as of 12/7/06): Patients undergo percutaneous biopsy of the target lesion and placement of a localization marker. Patients then undergo radiofrequency therapy (RFT) to the target lesion to induce the production of endogenous heat-shock proteins. After the procedure is completed, patients undergo a second biopsy of the target lesion. Patients also receive an intratumoral injection of sargramostim (GM-CSF) to promote further ablation at the tumor site.
  • Arm II: Patients undergo percutaneous biopsies and RFT as in arm I followed by radiofrequency ablation of the target lesion. Patients also receive intratumoral GM-CSF as in arm I.
  • Arm III: Patients undergo percutaneous biopsies and RFT as in arm I followed by cryoablation of the target lesion. Patients also receive intratumoral GM-CSF as in arm I.

Tumor tissue samples are obtained by core biopsy immediately before and immediately after RFT for RNA and protein analysis. Tissue samples are assessed by immunohistochemistry for tumor phenotype (i.e., MART-1, tyrosinase, or gp100) and for quantification of infiltrating lymphocytes. Peripheral blood samples are also obtained before and after treatment and periodically during study for immunologic analyses. Peripheral blood-derived lymphocytes are tested with a panel of monoclonal antibodies to estimate the percentages of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as B cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells. In addition, assays are performed to estimate T-cell responses to polyclonal stimulus (i.e., PHA), recall antigens (i.e., tetanus toxoid), and HLA alloantigens. Estimates of peptide-specific CTLs are also obtained by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays after in vitro stimulation with peptide-sensitized stimulator cells. Antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) will also be evaluated. GM-CSF levels and Hsp70 is assessed in tumor cells and peripheral blood by flow cytometry or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for up to 3 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed malignant melanoma meeting the following criteria:

    • Stage IV disease
    • Needle/probe accessible lesions of metastatic melanoma evident in the liver (or soft tissue) measuring 2 to 5 cm in size
    • HLA-A2 positive
  • No known standard therapy that is potentially curative or proven capable of extending life expectancy

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
  • ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL
  • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • AST ≤ 3 times ULN
  • Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
  • Prothrombin time ≤ ULN
  • Activated partial thromboplastin time ≤ ULN
  • No uncontrolled or current infection
  • No symptomatic heart disease (i.e., New York Heart Association classification III or IV)
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No known immune deficiency

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • More than 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy and recovered
  • More than 4 weeks since prior immunotherapy, biologic therapy, or radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Toxicity
Heat-shock protein levels
Tumor-specific immune response
Extent of lymphocyte infiltration
Tumor response by RECIST criteria

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Svetomir N Markovic, MD, PhD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CDR0000579004
  • P30CA015083 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • MC0474 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic Cancer Center)
  • 1189-05 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic IRB)
  • NCI-2009-01304 (Registry Identifier: NCI CTRP)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melanoma (Skin)

Clinical Trials on laboratory biomarker analysis

Subscribe